This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/england/tyne/6255003.stm

The article has changed 10 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Man cleared of 'revenge killing' Man cleared of 'revenge killing'
(20 minutes later)
A Tyneside man who has spent more than 14 years in prison for a revenge murder has had his conviction quashed.A Tyneside man who has spent more than 14 years in prison for a revenge murder has had his conviction quashed.
Andrew Adams, now 36, was convicted in 1993 of shooting former science teacher Jack Royal in Gateshead in 1990.Andrew Adams, now 36, was convicted in 1993 of shooting former science teacher Jack Royal in Gateshead in 1990.
His case was referred to the Appeal Court and judges ruled there was enough evidence to render it unsafe.His case was referred to the Appeal Court and judges ruled there was enough evidence to render it unsafe.
The Court of Appeal heard in December that a member of the jury which convicted him remarked to fellow jurors that he and his co-accused were guilty.The Court of Appeal heard in December that a member of the jury which convicted him remarked to fellow jurors that he and his co-accused were guilty.
Judges were told a woman juror had remarked on several occasions outside the jury room during the trial that she knew "these lads are guilty".Judges were told a woman juror had remarked on several occasions outside the jury room during the trial that she knew "these lads are guilty".
'Criticisms and failures'
Evidence of the woman's remarks was given by a fellow juror - referred to only as "Juror 9" - who told the appeal judges last month that the "passing comment" was repeated by the woman "numerous times".Evidence of the woman's remarks was given by a fellow juror - referred to only as "Juror 9" - who told the appeal judges last month that the "passing comment" was repeated by the woman "numerous times".
'Criticisms and failures'
Other jurors said "this can't be right", but the comments were not reported to the jury foreman or to the trial judge.Other jurors said "this can't be right", but the comments were not reported to the jury foreman or to the trial judge.
The Appeal Court found various "criticisms and failures" had the cumulative effect of being "sufficient to render the verdict unsafe".The Appeal Court found various "criticisms and failures" had the cumulative effect of being "sufficient to render the verdict unsafe".
Mr Royal's shooting was said to have been a revenge killing for the fatal stabbing by Mr Royal of a man during a street fight in 1987.Mr Royal's shooting was said to have been a revenge killing for the fatal stabbing by Mr Royal of a man during a street fight in 1987.
Mr Royal had been cleared after two trials heard he had acted in self-defence against David Thompson, his son's 29-year-old former business partner.Mr Royal had been cleared after two trials heard he had acted in self-defence against David Thompson, his son's 29-year-old former business partner.
Mr Adams, from Chapel Park, Newcastle, had claimed at the time that the guilty verdict at Newcastle Crown Court was "biased". Newcastle Crown Court found Mr Adams, then 23 and of Chapel Park, Newcastle, guilty of Mr Royal's killing in 1993. His co-accused, John Hands, was acquitted.
Mr Adams said at the time that the verdict was "biased".
It is a sad day because Mr Royal's murderers are still at large Andrew Adams' solicitor
He had his case referred to the Court of Appeal by the Criminal Cases Review Commission, the independent body which investigates possible miscarriages of justice.He had his case referred to the Court of Appeal by the Criminal Cases Review Commission, the independent body which investigates possible miscarriages of justice.
'Rebuild my life'
Speaking after hearing of the findings, Mr Adams, who was aged 23 at the time of the trial, said: "I am overwhelmed with all that has happened.Speaking after hearing of the findings, Mr Adams, who was aged 23 at the time of the trial, said: "I am overwhelmed with all that has happened.
"A few minutes ago I was a prisoner serving a life sentence for a crime I did not commit. I am now a free man.""A few minutes ago I was a prisoner serving a life sentence for a crime I did not commit. I am now a free man."
"I will now return to Newcastle and begin to rebuild the life I once had.""I will now return to Newcastle and begin to rebuild the life I once had."
Ben Rose, his solicitor, said: "It is a great day because, after being in prison for 14 years for a crime he did not commit, Mr Adams's conviction has finally been quashed.Ben Rose, his solicitor, said: "It is a great day because, after being in prison for 14 years for a crime he did not commit, Mr Adams's conviction has finally been quashed.
"It is a shameful day because the material which has led the Court of Appeal to quash Mr Adams conviction was there for his original lawyers to examine - something they failed to do."It is a shameful day because the material which has led the Court of Appeal to quash Mr Adams conviction was there for his original lawyers to examine - something they failed to do.
"Finally, it is a sad day because Mr Royal's murderers are still at large.""Finally, it is a sad day because Mr Royal's murderers are still at large."