This article is from the source 'rtcom' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.rt.com/usa/526426-austin-shooting-suspect-arrested/

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
Police nab one of two Austin mass shooting suspects as newspaper panned for hiding description to avoid ‘perpetuating stereotypes’ Police nab one of two Austin mass shooting suspects as newspaper panned for hiding description to avoid ‘perpetuating stereotypes’
(about 1 month later)
One of two suspects in a mass shooting that injured 14 people in Austin, Texas, has been apprehended, but the local newspaper is continuing to withhold the alleged shooter's description to avoid “perpetuating stereotypes.”One of two suspects in a mass shooting that injured 14 people in Austin, Texas, has been apprehended, but the local newspaper is continuing to withhold the alleged shooter's description to avoid “perpetuating stereotypes.”
Austin police offered no details of the arrest, other than to say that it was done with the help of a US Marshals task force. Mention of the arrest was tacked on to an earlier statement regarding the Saturday morning shooting, which described the alleged shooter. It's not clear whether that description applies to the man who was arrested or to the suspect who remained at large as of Saturday evening.Austin police offered no details of the arrest, other than to say that it was done with the help of a US Marshals task force. Mention of the arrest was tacked on to an earlier statement regarding the Saturday morning shooting, which described the alleged shooter. It's not clear whether that description applies to the man who was arrested or to the suspect who remained at large as of Saturday evening.
The Austin American-Statesman said in an editor's note beneath its coverage of the shooting that it declined to publish the description provided by police, saying it was “too vague at this time to be useful in identifying the shooter, and such publication could be harmful in perpetuating stereotypes.” The Austin American-Statesman said in an editor's note beneath its coverage of the shooting that it declined to publish the description provided by police, saying it was “too vague at this time to be useful in identifying the shooter, and such publication could be harmful in perpetuating stereotypes.” 
But the description included several details that set the suspect's appearance apart from the vast majority of Austin's population – potentially a safety benefit for local residents. Police clearly considered it worth telling the public, saying one of the suspects was a “black male with dreadlocks, wearing a black shirt and a skinny build.”But the description included several details that set the suspect's appearance apart from the vast majority of Austin's population – potentially a safety benefit for local residents. Police clearly considered it worth telling the public, saying one of the suspects was a “black male with dreadlocks, wearing a black shirt and a skinny build.”
Many social media users said the media outlet was putting its political agenda ahead of public safety. “They are literally putting people's lives at risk just to be politically correct,” one commenter said. “I bet if their children were in that area, they would tell them to stay away from anyone matching the description.”Many social media users said the media outlet was putting its political agenda ahead of public safety. “They are literally putting people's lives at risk just to be politically correct,” one commenter said. “I bet if their children were in that area, they would tell them to stay away from anyone matching the description.”
The Republic of Texas biker rally was being held in Austin this weekend, drawing thousands of bikers to the city's bar district, where the shooting occurred. The newspaper chose to emphasize that fact, potentially planting misleading seeds about rowdy bikers in the minds of some readers – even though the police said there was no immediate information suggesting that the biker gathering played any role in the shooting.The Republic of Texas biker rally was being held in Austin this weekend, drawing thousands of bikers to the city's bar district, where the shooting occurred. The newspaper chose to emphasize that fact, potentially planting misleading seeds about rowdy bikers in the minds of some readers – even though the police said there was no immediate information suggesting that the biker gathering played any role in the shooting.
“This does appear to be an isolated incident between two parties,” Austin Police Department Interim Chief Joseph Chacon said. “Most of the victims were innocent bystanders.”“This does appear to be an isolated incident between two parties,” Austin Police Department Interim Chief Joseph Chacon said. “Most of the victims were innocent bystanders.”
Even without a police description, the editor's note allowed Twitter users to narrow down the suspect's appearance. “When you know the shooter is definitely not white,” podcast host Scott Greer quipped.Even without a police description, the editor's note allowed Twitter users to narrow down the suspect's appearance. “When you know the shooter is definitely not white,” podcast host Scott Greer quipped.
Other media outlets, such as CNN, also excluded the shooter's description from their coverage, but unlike the American-Statesman, they didn't explain the omission to their audiences. Other media outlets, such as CNN, also excluded the shooter's description from their coverage, but unlike the American-Statesman, they didn't explain the omission to their audiences. 
Texas state Representative Jared Patterson, a Republican, said the American-Statesman editor who decided to hide the shooter's description should be “fired on the spot.” He added, “Police have released a description. Get it out to the public.”Texas state Representative Jared Patterson, a Republican, said the American-Statesman editor who decided to hide the shooter's description should be “fired on the spot.” He added, “Police have released a description. Get it out to the public.”
Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!
Dear readers and commenters,
We have implemented a new engine for our comment section. We hope the transition goes smoothly for all of you. Unfortunately, the comments made before the change have been lost due to a technical problem. We are working on restoring them, and hoping to see you fill up the comment section with new ones. You should still be able to log in to comment using your social-media profiles, but if you signed up under an RT profile before, you are invited to create a new profile with the new commenting system.
Sorry for the inconvenience, and looking forward to your future comments,
RT Team.