This article is from the source 'rtcom' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.rt.com/usa/527309-rich-get-richer-charity-fail/
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| Money from home: Richest US families keep wealth to themselves instead of generating more, study reveals | Money from home: Richest US families keep wealth to themselves instead of generating more, study reveals |
| (2 months later) | |
| A majority of the richest American families have opted to hold their assets rather than create new wealth, according to a survey from the Institute for Policy Studies, which tried to discern how rich families keep their riches. | A majority of the richest American families have opted to hold their assets rather than create new wealth, according to a survey from the Institute for Policy Studies, which tried to discern how rich families keep their riches. |
| Titled “Silver Spoon Oligarchs,” the new study showed how the top 0.01% richest Americans retained their wealth in spite of what are supposed to be high taxes levied on the ultra-wealthy. Spoiler alert: they aren’t producing useful goods, running factories, creating jobs, or any of that nonsense – they’re hoarding what they have and cashing in on the capital gains from their parents’ or other ancestral estates. | Titled “Silver Spoon Oligarchs,” the new study showed how the top 0.01% richest Americans retained their wealth in spite of what are supposed to be high taxes levied on the ultra-wealthy. Spoiler alert: they aren’t producing useful goods, running factories, creating jobs, or any of that nonsense – they’re hoarding what they have and cashing in on the capital gains from their parents’ or other ancestral estates. |
| Thanks to the US tax structure, which heavily favors the beneficiaries of inherited wealth, the scions of rich families have had no trouble cultivating their hoards in full view of the tax man. The tax structure of the US has mutated over the last three decades to favor the rich even more than it did previously, putting the lie to the myth of a “trickle down” economy. Money in the US doesn’t just trickle up – it gushes upward with the force of a geyser. | Thanks to the US tax structure, which heavily favors the beneficiaries of inherited wealth, the scions of rich families have had no trouble cultivating their hoards in full view of the tax man. The tax structure of the US has mutated over the last three decades to favor the rich even more than it did previously, putting the lie to the myth of a “trickle down” economy. Money in the US doesn’t just trickle up – it gushes upward with the force of a geyser. |
| “America’s dynastic families, both old and new, are deploying a range of wealth preservation strategies to further concentrate wealth and power – power that is deployed to influence democratic institutions, depress civic imagination, and rig the rules to further entrench inequality," the report declared, warning that “this tax avoidance means less support for the infrastructure we all rely on to preserve our health, safety, and quality of life." | “America’s dynastic families, both old and new, are deploying a range of wealth preservation strategies to further concentrate wealth and power – power that is deployed to influence democratic institutions, depress civic imagination, and rig the rules to further entrench inequality," the report declared, warning that “this tax avoidance means less support for the infrastructure we all rely on to preserve our health, safety, and quality of life." |
| Given that the vast majority of political donors sit amongst the top 0.01%, it’s hard to imagine politicians becoming genuinely concerned about the detrimental effect of the obscene wealth transfer on the American people. Not only did the US tax code gradually evolve to better suit the wealthy over the last half-century, but of the top 50 wealthiest families listed in Forbes last year, 27 had also been on the magazine’s list of 400 wealthiest families since at least 1983. Groups like Oxfam have been sounding the alarm about this issue for years – only to be largely ignored. Who wants to spoil the party, after all? | Given that the vast majority of political donors sit amongst the top 0.01%, it’s hard to imagine politicians becoming genuinely concerned about the detrimental effect of the obscene wealth transfer on the American people. Not only did the US tax code gradually evolve to better suit the wealthy over the last half-century, but of the top 50 wealthiest families listed in Forbes last year, 27 had also been on the magazine’s list of 400 wealthiest families since at least 1983. Groups like Oxfam have been sounding the alarm about this issue for years – only to be largely ignored. Who wants to spoil the party, after all? |
| The 27 “dynastic families” in question have seen their wealth mushroom at ten times the rate of regular families over the past 37 years, exploding a whopping 1,007% from $80.2 billion to $903.2 billion, adjusted for inflation. Meanwhile, the taxes paid by the wealthiest 0.01% of American billionaires dropped – factoring in inflation – a whopping 79% as a percentage of those oligarchs’ wealth. | The 27 “dynastic families” in question have seen their wealth mushroom at ten times the rate of regular families over the past 37 years, exploding a whopping 1,007% from $80.2 billion to $903.2 billion, adjusted for inflation. Meanwhile, the taxes paid by the wealthiest 0.01% of American billionaires dropped – factoring in inflation – a whopping 79% as a percentage of those oligarchs’ wealth. |
| Think your friends would be interested? Share this story! | Think your friends would be interested? Share this story! |
| Dear readers and commenters, | |
| We have implemented a new engine for our comment section. We hope the transition goes smoothly for all of you. Unfortunately, the comments made before the change have been lost due to a technical problem. We are working on restoring them, and hoping to see you fill up the comment section with new ones. You should still be able to log in to comment using your social-media profiles, but if you signed up under an RT profile before, you are invited to create a new profile with the new commenting system. | |
| Sorry for the inconvenience, and looking forward to your future comments, | |
| RT Team. |