This article is from the source 'rtcom' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.rt.com/news/530023-australia-covid-activewear-fine/
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| ‘Predatory & dangerous behavior’: Australian brand fined nearly $4 million over misleading advertising of ‘anti-viral’ activewear | ‘Predatory & dangerous behavior’: Australian brand fined nearly $4 million over misleading advertising of ‘anti-viral’ activewear |
| (about 1 month later) | |
| The brand was fined AU$5 million (some $3.7 million) by the Federal Court of Australia on Friday. In addition to the fine, the company was ordered to publish corrective notices for its ill-fated ad campaign. | The brand was fined AU$5 million (some $3.7 million) by the Federal Court of Australia on Friday. In addition to the fine, the company was ordered to publish corrective notices for its ill-fated ad campaign. |
| Australian label Lorna Jane has been slapped with a huge fine over an advertising campaign that promoted clothes said to protect wearers from viruses such as Covid-19, having allegedly been treated with some miraculous compound. | Australian label Lorna Jane has been slapped with a huge fine over an advertising campaign that promoted clothes said to protect wearers from viruses such as Covid-19, having allegedly been treated with some miraculous compound. |
| The case against Lorna Jane stemmed from an advertising campaign, conducted back in July 2020, promoting a line of activewear that would allegedly protect wearers from bacteria and viruses, including Covid-19. The brand claimed the clothing had been treated with a mysterious, “water-based, non-toxic” solution, dubbed ‘LJ Shield’ that was somehow able to kill the germs. | The case against Lorna Jane stemmed from an advertising campaign, conducted back in July 2020, promoting a line of activewear that would allegedly protect wearers from bacteria and viruses, including Covid-19. The brand claimed the clothing had been treated with a mysterious, “water-based, non-toxic” solution, dubbed ‘LJ Shield’ that was somehow able to kill the germs. |
| Announcing the ruling, Judge Darryl Rangiah said the company had preyed on the uncertainty that prevailed during the coronavirus pandemic. It had misled its customers and sought “to profit from the fear,” pretending “it had a reasonable scientific or technological basis” for the claims, although it had none. | Announcing the ruling, Judge Darryl Rangiah said the company had preyed on the uncertainty that prevailed during the coronavirus pandemic. It had misled its customers and sought “to profit from the fear,” pretending “it had a reasonable scientific or technological basis” for the claims, although it had none. |
| “Lorna Jane sought to exploit that fear and concern of the public through the use of misleading, deceptive, and untrue representations about the properties of LJ Shield activewear,” the judge said. | “Lorna Jane sought to exploit that fear and concern of the public through the use of misleading, deceptive, and untrue representations about the properties of LJ Shield activewear,” the judge said. |
| Lorna Jane had already been fined AU$40,000 (nearly $28,000) for its stunt last year, but that did not spare the company from a lawsuit launched by the nation’s consumer watchdog, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC). | Lorna Jane had already been fined AU$40,000 (nearly $28,000) for its stunt last year, but that did not spare the company from a lawsuit launched by the nation’s consumer watchdog, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC). |
| “This was dreadful conduct, as it involved making serious claims regarding public health when there was no basis for them,” ACCC Chair Rod Sims said in a statement. | “This was dreadful conduct, as it involved making serious claims regarding public health when there was no basis for them,” ACCC Chair Rod Sims said in a statement. |
| The company has accepted the court ruling, acknowledging it had misled its customers. Nonetheless, Lorna Jane CEO Bill Clarkson insists it was an honest mistake on the company’s part, rather than a case of deliberate false advertising. He shifted the blame for the LJ Shield fiasco on an undisclosed “trusted supplier” that had allegedly duped the company into thinking the technology was legitimate. | The company has accepted the court ruling, acknowledging it had misled its customers. Nonetheless, Lorna Jane CEO Bill Clarkson insists it was an honest mistake on the company’s part, rather than a case of deliberate false advertising. He shifted the blame for the LJ Shield fiasco on an undisclosed “trusted supplier” that had allegedly duped the company into thinking the technology was legitimate. |
| “A trusted supplier sold us a product that did not perform as promised,” Clarkson said in a statement. “They led us to believe the technology behind LJ Shield was being sold elsewhere in Australia, the USA, China, and Taiwan and that it was both antibacterial and antiviral. We believed we were passing on a benefit to our customers.” | “A trusted supplier sold us a product that did not perform as promised,” Clarkson said in a statement. “They led us to believe the technology behind LJ Shield was being sold elsewhere in Australia, the USA, China, and Taiwan and that it was both antibacterial and antiviral. We believed we were passing on a benefit to our customers.” |
| Think your friends would be interested? Share this story! | Think your friends would be interested? Share this story! |
| Dear readers and commenters, | |
| We have implemented a new engine for our comment section. We hope the transition goes smoothly for all of you. Unfortunately, the comments made before the change have been lost due to a technical problem. We are working on restoring them, and hoping to see you fill up the comment section with new ones. You should still be able to log in to comment using your social-media profiles, but if you signed up under an RT profile before, you are invited to create a new profile with the new commenting system. | |
| Sorry for the inconvenience, and looking forward to your future comments, | |
| RT Team. |