This article is from the source 'rtcom' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.rt.com/usa/532500-washington-post-taliban-trump/
The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| Washington Post accused of providing PR to Taliban after arguing group incites less violence than Trump on Twitter | Washington Post accused of providing PR to Taliban after arguing group incites less violence than Trump on Twitter |
| (7 days later) | |
| The Washington Post has come under fire after publishing an article insinuating that the Taliban hasn’t been banned from Twitter like former President Donald Trump because it incites less violence in its carefully worded posts. | The Washington Post has come under fire after publishing an article insinuating that the Taliban hasn’t been banned from Twitter like former President Donald Trump because it incites less violence in its carefully worded posts. |
| The headline hails the Taliban’s “sophisticated social media practices that rarely violate the rules.” In the article, reporters Craig Timberg and Cristiano Lima wrote that the Taliban has “used strikingly sophisticated social media tactics to build political momentum” and “make a public case that they’re ready to lead a modern nation state after nearly 20 years of war.” | The headline hails the Taliban’s “sophisticated social media practices that rarely violate the rules.” In the article, reporters Craig Timberg and Cristiano Lima wrote that the Taliban has “used strikingly sophisticated social media tactics to build political momentum” and “make a public case that they’re ready to lead a modern nation state after nearly 20 years of war.” |
| The reporters also argue that the Taliban – who they described as “a group that espouses ancient” and “traditional moral codes” – has been using messaging on social networks such as Facebook and Twitter that “challenges the West’s dominant image of the group as intolerant, vicious and bent on revenge, while staying within the evolving boundaries of taste” – a tone that some found oddly sympathetic to the terrorist group. | The reporters also argue that the Taliban – who they described as “a group that espouses ancient” and “traditional moral codes” – has been using messaging on social networks such as Facebook and Twitter that “challenges the West’s dominant image of the group as intolerant, vicious and bent on revenge, while staying within the evolving boundaries of taste” – a tone that some found oddly sympathetic to the terrorist group. |
| “The tactics overall show such a high degree of skill that analysts believe at least one public relations firm is advising the Taliban,” the Post continued, prompting some to accuse the newspaper of aiding those PR efforts. | “The tactics overall show such a high degree of skill that analysts believe at least one public relations firm is advising the Taliban,” the Post continued, prompting some to accuse the newspaper of aiding those PR efforts. |
| Evoking most outrage was the part where the paper suggests, citing experts, that the reason why former President Donald Trump is banned from Twitter and the Taliban is not is because Trump broke the site’s rules “against hate speech and inciting violence” whereas, technically, the “Taliban, by and large, does not.” | Evoking most outrage was the part where the paper suggests, citing experts, that the reason why former President Donald Trump is banned from Twitter and the Taliban is not is because Trump broke the site’s rules “against hate speech and inciting violence” whereas, technically, the “Taliban, by and large, does not.” |
| Online extremism expert Rita Katz told the newspaper that the Taliban is “threading the needle regarding social media content policies” but “is not yet crossing the very distinct policy-violating lines that Trump crossed.” | Online extremism expert Rita Katz told the newspaper that the Taliban is “threading the needle regarding social media content policies” but “is not yet crossing the very distinct policy-violating lines that Trump crossed.” |
| And after the article was published, Washington Post technology policy editor Mark Seibel tweeted it with the caption: “Why Trump’s banned and the Taliban aren’t: they play by the rules.” | And after the article was published, Washington Post technology policy editor Mark Seibel tweeted it with the caption: “Why Trump’s banned and the Taliban aren’t: they play by the rules.” |
| Seibel was quickly hammered by responses accusing him and the Post of providing public relations to the Taliban through its characterization of the group and insinuation that they incite less violence than the former president of the United States. | Seibel was quickly hammered by responses accusing him and the Post of providing public relations to the Taliban through its characterization of the group and insinuation that they incite less violence than the former president of the United States. |
| “Did the Taliban write this?” questioned conservative columnist Rita Panahi, while writer Michael Quinn Sullivan wrote, “More accurate: Twitter created rules to punish Trump and cater to terrorists.” | “Did the Taliban write this?” questioned conservative columnist Rita Panahi, while writer Michael Quinn Sullivan wrote, “More accurate: Twitter created rules to punish Trump and cater to terrorists.” |
| “They might be bloodthirsty slavers & rapists, but at least they're not rude,” another person responded. | “They might be bloodthirsty slavers & rapists, but at least they're not rude,” another person responded. |
| North Carolina Congressman Dan Bishop – a Republican – reacted by referencing the Washington Post’s tagline, ‘Democracy Dies in Darkness’. | North Carolina Congressman Dan Bishop – a Republican – reacted by referencing the Washington Post’s tagline, ‘Democracy Dies in Darkness’. |
| Think your friends would be interested? Share this story! | Think your friends would be interested? Share this story! |
| Dear readers and commenters, | |
| We have implemented a new engine for our comment section. We hope the transition goes smoothly for all of you. Unfortunately, the comments made before the change have been lost due to a technical problem. We are working on restoring them, and hoping to see you fill up the comment section with new ones. You should still be able to log in to comment using your social-media profiles, but if you signed up under an RT profile before, you are invited to create a new profile with the new commenting system. | |
| Sorry for the inconvenience, and looking forward to your future comments, | |
| RT Team. |