This article is from the source 'rtcom' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.rt.com/usa/533312-afghanistan-strike-isis-retaliation/
The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
US military says it carried out drone strike targeting ISIS-K member in eastern Afghanistan | US military says it carried out drone strike targeting ISIS-K member in eastern Afghanistan |
(32 minutes later) | |
The Pentagon said it launched a drone strike to take out an Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS) member, believed to be involved in organizing attacks against the US in Kabul. It comes after a blast killed 13 American servicemen. | |
The retaliatory strike was carried out early Saturday morning, and was reported a success, resulting in no civilian casualties. | |
"Initial indications are that we killed the target. We know of no civilian casualties," US Central Command (CENTCOM) said in a statement. | |
The target was described as “an ISIS-K planner” by CENTCOM spokesman Capt. Bill Urban, but was not identified in the report. | |
The strike was launched from outside of Afghanistan at the orders of Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, after President Joe Biden authorized the operation, the AP reported, citing an anonymous defense official. | |
Urban did not elaborate if the alleged “planner” was specifically involved in plotting a major attack on the Kabul airport on Thursday that killed 13 US servicemen, two British nationals and some 90 Afghans, including 28 Taliban members. | |
The strike was conducted in Afghanistan’s Nangarhar province in the country's east, thought to be a stronghold for the ISIS affiliate. Nangarhar is located to the east of Kabul province, along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border. | |
DETAILS TO FOLLOW | DETAILS TO FOLLOW |
Dear readers and commenters, | Dear readers and commenters, |
We have implemented a new engine for our comment section. We hope the transition goes smoothly for all of you. Unfortunately, the comments made before the change have been lost due to a technical problem. We are working on restoring them, and hoping to see you fill up the comment section with new ones. You should still be able to log in to comment using your social-media profiles, but if you signed up under an RT profile before, you are invited to create a new profile with the new commenting system. | We have implemented a new engine for our comment section. We hope the transition goes smoothly for all of you. Unfortunately, the comments made before the change have been lost due to a technical problem. We are working on restoring them, and hoping to see you fill up the comment section with new ones. You should still be able to log in to comment using your social-media profiles, but if you signed up under an RT profile before, you are invited to create a new profile with the new commenting system. |
Sorry for the inconvenience, and looking forward to your future comments, | Sorry for the inconvenience, and looking forward to your future comments, |
RT Team. | RT Team. |