This article is from the source 'rtcom' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.rt.com/usa/533733-private-deployment-national-guards/

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
House bans privately funded National Guard missions, like one ordered by South Dakota governor in Texas House bans privately funded National Guard missions, like one ordered by South Dakota governor in Texas
(about 2 months later)
This summer, Governor Kristi Noem caused a furore by sending the National Guard from her state to secure the Texas border with Mexico, with a private donor picking up the tab. The House is set to ban any further deployments.This summer, Governor Kristi Noem caused a furore by sending the National Guard from her state to secure the Texas border with Mexico, with a private donor picking up the tab. The House is set to ban any further deployments.
Noem, the Republican governor of South Dakota, sent 50 troops "to secure our southern border," in a move that her Texas counterpart, Greg Abbott, enthusiastically welcomed. The mission was framed as a response to a security crisis that, as Noem put it, President Joe Biden's administration "has created." Unconventionally, it was funded by a private donation from the family foundation of the Tennessee vehicle-salvage magnate, Willis Johnson.Noem, the Republican governor of South Dakota, sent 50 troops "to secure our southern border," in a move that her Texas counterpart, Greg Abbott, enthusiastically welcomed. The mission was framed as a response to a security crisis that, as Noem put it, President Joe Biden's administration "has created." Unconventionally, it was funded by a private donation from the family foundation of the Tennessee vehicle-salvage magnate, Willis Johnson.
The deployment generated shockwaves, with critics in the Democratic Party wondering if it was even legal to turn the Guards into a 'private militia' that billionaires can 'hire' to perform a 'partisan political stunt.' The answer to that turned out to be 'yes, it's legal.' But, in the future, similar deployments, if they do happen, would depend on the good will of the federal government.The deployment generated shockwaves, with critics in the Democratic Party wondering if it was even legal to turn the Guards into a 'private militia' that billionaires can 'hire' to perform a 'partisan political stunt.' The answer to that turned out to be 'yes, it's legal.' But, in the future, similar deployments, if they do happen, would depend on the good will of the federal government.
The restriction was approved in an amendment to the must-pass annual National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which went through a markup session by the House Armed Services Committee on Wednesday. The provision bans governors from ordering privately-funded cross-border missions, unless they are part of a federal response to a disaster.The restriction was approved in an amendment to the must-pass annual National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which went through a markup session by the House Armed Services Committee on Wednesday. The provision bans governors from ordering privately-funded cross-border missions, unless they are part of a federal response to a disaster.
"I don't believe that our National Guard should be up for auction or up for sale," said Texas Democrat Rep. Veronica Escobar as she introduced the amendment. She offered a transparency rationale for the proposal, saying there was no way to tell if a "foreign government" hostile to the US could be the ultimate source of private funding."I don't believe that our National Guard should be up for auction or up for sale," said Texas Democrat Rep. Veronica Escobar as she introduced the amendment. She offered a transparency rationale for the proposal, saying there was no way to tell if a "foreign government" hostile to the US could be the ultimate source of private funding.
Rep. Austin Scott from Georgia pushed back, stating that it was "an absolutely ridiculous accusation that National Guards are up for sale." The Republican pointed out that all cross-border deployments, regardless of how they are funded, require the approval and cooperation of elected officials – the governors of relevant states. Nevertheless, the proposal was approved by the committee.Rep. Austin Scott from Georgia pushed back, stating that it was "an absolutely ridiculous accusation that National Guards are up for sale." The Republican pointed out that all cross-border deployments, regardless of how they are funded, require the approval and cooperation of elected officials – the governors of relevant states. Nevertheless, the proposal was approved by the committee.
US states send their National Guard personnel across their borders on a regular basis, providing additional boots on the ground and resources to respond to emergencies like hurricanes or big wildfires. The host state usually foots the bill.US states send their National Guard personnel across their borders on a regular basis, providing additional boots on the ground and resources to respond to emergencies like hurricanes or big wildfires. The host state usually foots the bill.
Noem's office said South Dakota law regulating emergency management gave the governor the authority to cover the expenses for the deployment to Texas with private money. Escobar's amendment preserves an exemption for privately-funded disaster relief, but only during a major emergency or disaster announced by the US President.Noem's office said South Dakota law regulating emergency management gave the governor the authority to cover the expenses for the deployment to Texas with private money. Escobar's amendment preserves an exemption for privately-funded disaster relief, but only during a major emergency or disaster announced by the US President.
If you like this story, share it with a friend!If you like this story, share it with a friend!
Dear readers and commenters,
We have implemented a new engine for our comment section. We hope the transition goes smoothly for all of you. Unfortunately, the comments made before the change have been lost due to a technical problem. We are working on restoring them, and hoping to see you fill up the comment section with new ones. You should still be able to log in to comment using your social-media profiles, but if you signed up under an RT profile before, you are invited to create a new profile with the new commenting system.
Sorry for the inconvenience, and looking forward to your future comments,
RT Team.