This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/world/europe/8033635.stm

The article has changed 10 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
Vukovar sentence ruled inadequate Hague increases Vukovar sentence
(20 minutes later)
A UN war crimes appeals chamber has ruled that a jail term passed on an ex-Yugoslav army officer for crimes at Vukovar in 1991 was inadequate. A UN war crimes appeals court has ruled that an ex-Yugoslav army officer jailed for crimes at Vukovar in 1991 should serve 17, not five years.
Veselin Sljivancanin was jailed for five years for the crime of torture and was released in December 2007 after four years in custody. It found the original sentence against Veselin Sljivancanin for torture was inadequate and jailed him for aiding and abetting the murder of prisoners.
He had returned to The Hague on Monday to hear the court ruling. Sljivancanin was released in December 2007 after four years in custody.
The chamber upheld a sentence of 20 years for murder and torture against Sljivancanin's superior, Mile Mrksic. He had returned to The Hague for the ruling which also upheld a sentence against his superior, Mile Mrksic.
Mrksic is serving 20 years for aiding and abetting the murder and torture of prisoners, as well as allowing inhumane conditions of detention.
Judges found the army had allowed Serb paramilitaries to kill prisoners of war sheltering at a hospital in Vukovar.Judges found the army had allowed Serb paramilitaries to kill prisoners of war sheltering at a hospital in Vukovar.
The original verdict provoked outrage from Croatia, which said the sentences were too light and that charges of crimes against humanity were wrongly dismissed on the basis that the dead had not been civilians. The original verdicts provoked outrage from Croatia, which said the sentences were too light and that charges of crimes against humanity were wrongly dismissed on the basis that the dead had not been civilians.
It also disputed the acquittal of a third defendant, Miroslav Radic.It also disputed the acquittal of a third defendant, Miroslav Radic.
Mass gravesMass graves
At the original trial, prosecutors said the Yugoslav People's Army (JNA) had besieged Vukovar from August to November 1991, during which time some 1,000 of the city's residents were killed and another 5,000 taken prisoner.At the original trial, prosecutors said the Yugoslav People's Army (JNA) had besieged Vukovar from August to November 1991, during which time some 1,000 of the city's residents were killed and another 5,000 taken prisoner.
Both Mrksic (left) and Sljivancanin deny they are guilty of any war crimesBoth Mrksic (left) and Sljivancanin deny they are guilty of any war crimes
In the last days of the siege, several hundred people sought refuge at the city's hospital, hoping to be evacuated in the presence of international observers.In the last days of the siege, several hundred people sought refuge at the city's hospital, hoping to be evacuated in the presence of international observers.
But on 20 November 1991, JNA soldiers stopped guarding the prisoners, allowing Serb Territorial Defence and paramilitary forces to load about 400 on to buses and take them to a farm in nearby Ovcara where at least 194 were beaten and later killed.But on 20 November 1991, JNA soldiers stopped guarding the prisoners, allowing Serb Territorial Defence and paramilitary forces to load about 400 on to buses and take them to a farm in nearby Ovcara where at least 194 were beaten and later killed.
After the killings, the bodies of the victims were buried by bulldozer in a mass grave at the same location.After the killings, the bodies of the victims were buried by bulldozer in a mass grave at the same location.
Mrksic was found guilty of aiding and abetting the murders as he had ordered the withdrawal of the JNA soldiers guarding the prisoners.Mrksic was found guilty of aiding and abetting the murders as he had ordered the withdrawal of the JNA soldiers guarding the prisoners.
The JNA forces had earlier established inhumane conditions of detention and Mrksic had also failed to act effectively to ensure that the prisoners were properly protected or treated, the court found.The JNA forces had earlier established inhumane conditions of detention and Mrksic had also failed to act effectively to ensure that the prisoners were properly protected or treated, the court found.
Sljivancanin was found guilty of aiding and abetting torture because he had failed to secure adequate JNA guards at Ovcara and ensure that soldiers under his command acted to prevent the Serb forces from beating the prisoners, the ICTY judges said.Sljivancanin was found guilty of aiding and abetting torture because he had failed to secure adequate JNA guards at Ovcara and ensure that soldiers under his command acted to prevent the Serb forces from beating the prisoners, the ICTY judges said.