This article is from the source 'rtcom' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.rt.com/usa/534662-missile-pentagon-north-korea/

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Pentagon denounces North Korea’s reported long-range missile launch, vows to protect regional allies Pentagon denounces North Korea’s reported long-range missile launch, vows to protect regional allies
(about 4 hours later)
The US military said it “monitors” the situation after North Korea claimed it had tested a new type of long-range cruise missile. The Pentagon argued that the test proves that Pyongyang poses a threat to its allies in the region. The US has said it is continuing to “monitor the situation” after North Korea reported testing a new type of long-range cruise missile. The Pentagon argued the test proves that Pyongyang poses a threat to its allies in the region.
North Korea’s state media reported on Monday that Pyongyang successfully tested a new long-range cruise missile, which allegedly travelled some 1,500 km (930 miles) before obliterating its target and splashing into North Korea’s territorial waters. North Korea’s state media reported on Monday that Pyongyang successfully tested a new long-range cruise missile, which allegedly traveled some 1,500km (930 miles) before obliterating its target and splashing into North Korea’s territorial waters.
Several hours after North Korea announced the tests, which were reportedly conducted over the weekend, the Pentagon said that it was “aware of reports of DRPK cruise missile launches.” The US military, however, fell short of confirming or denying the fact of the launch, nor did it comment on the type of weapon that Pyongyang claimed to have fired into the sea. Several hours after North Korea announced the tests, which were reportedly conducted over the weekend, the Pentagon said it was “aware of reports of DRPK cruise missile launches.” However, it fell short of confirming or denying the fact of the launch, nor did it comment on the type of weapon Pyongyang claimed to have fired into the sea.
“We will continue to monitor the situation and are consulting closely with our allies and partners,” the statement issued by the Pentagon’s Indo-Pacific Command (INDOPACOM) read.“We will continue to monitor the situation and are consulting closely with our allies and partners,” the statement issued by the Pentagon’s Indo-Pacific Command (INDOPACOM) read.
At the same time, the US military said that the reported launch of the cruise missiles, which are, however, not expressly banned under UN Security Council (UNSC) resolutions on North Korea, “highlights” Pyongyang’s “continuing focus on developing its military program and the threats that [it] poses to its neighbors and the international community.” The Defense Department went on to say that the reported launch of the cruise missiles, which are not expressly banned under UN Security Council (UNSC) resolutions on North Korea, “highlights” Pyongyang’s “continuing focus on developing its military program and the threats that [it] poses to its neighbors and the international community.”
Japan has also said that it was “concerned” over the reports of the launch. Japan also said it was “concerned” over the reports of the launch.
The Pentagon went on to note that its pledge to protect South Korea and Japan - both countries rely on the US military to defend them in case a major conflict breaks out -  remains “ironclad.” Washington retains operational control over the South Korean military since 1954, and is set to hand over the reins to Seoul next year as part of a transition plan. About 28,500 troops have been based in South Korea, while some 55,000 have been stationed in Japan. According to a March report by the US Government Accountability Office, the US has funneled more than $34 billion into its continuing military presence in the two North Korea’s neighbouring countries between 2016 and 2019 alone. The Pentagon noted that its pledge to protect South Korea and Japan – both countries rely on the US military to defend them in case a major conflict breaks out – remains “ironclad.” 
While Washington claims that its presence in the region and shows of power in the form of joint war games with Seoul are needed to deter Pyongyang, North Korea has been accusing the US of taking a “hostile” approach, refusing to revive stalled denuclearization talks. Washington has retained operational control over the South Korean military since 1954 and is set to hand over the reins to Seoul next year as part of a transition plan. About US 28,500 troops are based in South Korea, while some 55,000 are stationed in Japan. According to a March report by the US Government Accountability Office, the US has funneled more than $34 billion into its continuing military presence in the two countries neighboring North Korea between 2016 and 2019 alone.
In its report on the launch, North Korea’s state agency KCNA said that the missile was designed to serve as “effective deterrence means”  able to “contain military maneuvers of hostile forces.” While Washington claims its presence in the region and displays of power in the form of joint war games with Seoul are needed to deter Pyongyang, North Korea accuses the US of taking a “hostile” approach, refusing to revive stalled denuclearization talks.
In its report on the launch, North Korean state agency KCNA said the missile was designed to serve as “effective deterrence means” able to “contain military maneuvers of hostile forces.”
Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!
Dear readers and commenters,Dear readers and commenters,
We have implemented a new engine for our comment section. We hope the transition goes smoothly for all of you. Unfortunately, the comments made before the change have been lost due to a technical problem. We are working on restoring them, and hoping to see you fill up the comment section with new ones. You should still be able to log in to comment using your social-media profiles, but if you signed up under an RT profile before, you are invited to create a new profile with the new commenting system.We have implemented a new engine for our comment section. We hope the transition goes smoothly for all of you. Unfortunately, the comments made before the change have been lost due to a technical problem. We are working on restoring them, and hoping to see you fill up the comment section with new ones. You should still be able to log in to comment using your social-media profiles, but if you signed up under an RT profile before, you are invited to create a new profile with the new commenting system.
Sorry for the inconvenience, and looking forward to your future comments,Sorry for the inconvenience, and looking forward to your future comments,
RT Team.RT Team.