This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk/6263901.stm

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Diana inquest to sit with no jury Diana inquest to sit without jury
(about 1 hour later)
The inquest into the death of Diana, Princess of Wales in 1997 will not be heard by a jury, the coroner has said.The inquest into the death of Diana, Princess of Wales in 1997 will not be heard by a jury, the coroner has said.
Lady Elizabeth Butler-Sloss had been considering sitting with a jury of the public, after already rejecting a jury of members of the royal household. Lady Elizabeth Butler-Sloss had been considering sitting with a jury made up of members of the public.
But she decided to hear the case alone after scrutinising legal arguments delivered at the High Court last week.But she decided to hear the case alone after scrutinising legal arguments delivered at the High Court last week.
The inquest, expected to take place in May, will examine the deaths in Paris of the princess and Dodi Al Fayed. Mohamed Al Fayed, whose son Dodi died with the princess in Paris, said it was a "shocking but predictable" decision not to have a jury at their inquest.
Lawyers for Mohamed Al Fayed had argued in favour of a public jury. The inquest is expected to be held in May.
Conspiracy theoriesConspiracy theories
Lady Butler-Sloss appealed for any attempts to challenge her decision to be made promptly. Lady Butler-Sloss's decision follows an earlier announcement in which she rejected having a jury made up of members of the royal household.
In a 34-page document, she considered the arguments in favour of sitting with a jury. In a 34-page document, she considered the arguments in favour of sitting with a public jury.
She pointed to the assertion she would be perceived as biased because she gave her backing to Lord Stevens's report into the deaths - which dismissed many of the conspiracy theories surrounding the crash.She pointed to the assertion she would be perceived as biased because she gave her backing to Lord Stevens's report into the deaths - which dismissed many of the conspiracy theories surrounding the crash.
But she denied any allegations of bias.But she denied any allegations of bias.
Lady Butler-Sloss says a "fully reasoned decision" is neededLady Butler-Sloss says a "fully reasoned decision" is needed
She accepted that the "intense public interest" in the deaths had to be taken into account - but said it could be used in arguments for or against having a jury.She accepted that the "intense public interest" in the deaths had to be taken into account - but said it could be used in arguments for or against having a jury.
"The disadvantage of a jury is the need in these inquests to have a careful and fully reasoned decision reviewing all the relevant evidence and providing a clear conclusion as to by what means and in what circumstances the princess and Dodi Al Fayed died," she said."The disadvantage of a jury is the need in these inquests to have a careful and fully reasoned decision reviewing all the relevant evidence and providing a clear conclusion as to by what means and in what circumstances the princess and Dodi Al Fayed died," she said.
"Such a reasoned decision can only be given by the coroner and cannot be given by a jury.""Such a reasoned decision can only be given by the coroner and cannot be given by a jury."
But Mr Al Fayed said: "The public, and in particular, a jury of ordinary people must hear all the evidence, in front of an independent and fair-minded coroner."
He said he has instructed lawyers to take "all possible steps" towards achieving a public jury.
The Stevens report concluded that the crash, in the Pont de l'Alma tunnel in Paris on 31 August 1997, was a tragic accident, and that driver Henri Paul was drunk and driving too fast.The Stevens report concluded that the crash, in the Pont de l'Alma tunnel in Paris on 31 August 1997, was a tragic accident, and that driver Henri Paul was drunk and driving too fast.
Mohamed Al Fayed maintains the couple were murdered and claims their deaths were part of a secret plot by the British establishment. Mr Al Fayed maintains the couple were murdered and claims their deaths were part of a secret plot by the British establishment.
At least 40 witnesses will give evidence at the full inquest.At least 40 witnesses will give evidence at the full inquest.