This article is from the source 'rtcom' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.rt.com/uk/535424-birds-britain-judge-women/
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| Judge rules banker was ‘plainly sexist’ to refer to women as ‘birds’ in discrimination case | Judge rules banker was ‘plainly sexist’ to refer to women as ‘birds’ in discrimination case |
| (30 days later) | |
| A British judge has ruled that the term “bird” is a “plainly sexist” slur towards women, after a Barclays investment banker claimed that she was mistreated by her boss who continually used the word when speaking to her. | A British judge has ruled that the term “bird” is a “plainly sexist” slur towards women, after a Barclays investment banker claimed that she was mistreated by her boss who continually used the word when speaking to her. |
| Judge John Crosfill ruled that Romanian investment banker Anca Lacatus should be compensated for the treatment she received while working at Barclays. | Judge John Crosfill ruled that Romanian investment banker Anca Lacatus should be compensated for the treatment she received while working at Barclays. |
| The tribunal in East London heard that Lacatus’ boss, James Kinghorn, had repeatedly referred to her as a “bird” and that she was afraid to go to HR about it, though she had repeatedly and openly criticized him for using the term, British media reported. | The tribunal in East London heard that Lacatus’ boss, James Kinghorn, had repeatedly referred to her as a “bird” and that she was afraid to go to HR about it, though she had repeatedly and openly criticized him for using the term, British media reported. |
| The judge decided that calling women “birds” is “plainly sexist” and said that Kinghorn was “foolish” to assume that anyone would find it funny. Crosfill claimed using the phrase ironically in an attempt at humour while at work is “misplaced.” | The judge decided that calling women “birds” is “plainly sexist” and said that Kinghorn was “foolish” to assume that anyone would find it funny. Crosfill claimed using the phrase ironically in an attempt at humour while at work is “misplaced.” |
| The judge heard that Lacatus was worried that going to HR with her complaint would damage her position in the company and endanger her £46,000 a year analyst role. | The judge heard that Lacatus was worried that going to HR with her complaint would damage her position in the company and endanger her £46,000 a year analyst role. |
| The tribunal also backed Lacatus’ claim that the firm should have allowed her to change her working hours as she suffered from endometriosis (a condition affecting female reproductive organs) and anxiety. | The tribunal also backed Lacatus’ claim that the firm should have allowed her to change her working hours as she suffered from endometriosis (a condition affecting female reproductive organs) and anxiety. |
| However, news of the judge’s ruling on Kinghorn’s language didn’t go down well with many Brits on social media, many of whom saw the edict on commonly used slang as a stretch too far. “The worlds gone mad,” one man wrote. | However, news of the judge’s ruling on Kinghorn’s language didn’t go down well with many Brits on social media, many of whom saw the edict on commonly used slang as a stretch too far. “The worlds gone mad,” one man wrote. |
| Others agreed, arguing that people were too easily offended these days. “What’s wrong with people? Can’t say anything to anyone these days without them crying into their milk,” one person wrote. | Others agreed, arguing that people were too easily offended these days. “What’s wrong with people? Can’t say anything to anyone these days without them crying into their milk,” one person wrote. |
| Some women chipped in, suggesting they liked being called “birds” and didn’t understand what all the fuss was about. “They take offence at everything - wouldn’t bother me if my husband said I was his bird (better than some of the names he calls me),” one said. Another countered, however, that there was a difference between a husband and a boss using the word. | Some women chipped in, suggesting they liked being called “birds” and didn’t understand what all the fuss was about. “They take offence at everything - wouldn’t bother me if my husband said I was his bird (better than some of the names he calls me),” one said. Another countered, however, that there was a difference between a husband and a boss using the word. |
| Another woman said she found such “pet names” adorable rather than sexist, and questioned why others felt they needed to define what is sexist for other women. | Another woman said she found such “pet names” adorable rather than sexist, and questioned why others felt they needed to define what is sexist for other women. |
| Others made light of the situation. One asked if women were still happy to have “hen parties,” while another questioned whether ‘Birds of a Feather’ – a popular sitcom originally broadcast in the late 80s – would be cancelled. | Others made light of the situation. One asked if women were still happy to have “hen parties,” while another questioned whether ‘Birds of a Feather’ – a popular sitcom originally broadcast in the late 80s – would be cancelled. |
| Even former ‘Good Morning Britain’ host Piers Morgan chimed in with some sarcasm. “This ruling is so offensive to birds. Why are they being stigmatised in this way,” he wrote. | Even former ‘Good Morning Britain’ host Piers Morgan chimed in with some sarcasm. “This ruling is so offensive to birds. Why are they being stigmatised in this way,” he wrote. |
| Others weren’t so troubled by the ruling, saying they didn’t even know the term was still used. | Others weren’t so troubled by the ruling, saying they didn’t even know the term was still used. |
| “Didn't realise the expression was still in use. Very 1970s,” one said, jokingly blaming ITV for re-running episodes of ‘On the Buses’, a sitcom that ran from 1969 with an undercurrent of sexist humour. | “Didn't realise the expression was still in use. Very 1970s,” one said, jokingly blaming ITV for re-running episodes of ‘On the Buses’, a sitcom that ran from 1969 with an undercurrent of sexist humour. |
| Another said they hated “wokism” but agreed that the term ‘bird’ was certainly no longer appropriate. | Another said they hated “wokism” but agreed that the term ‘bird’ was certainly no longer appropriate. |
| Some online sources suggest, as noted by many on social media, the current use of the word ‘bird’ for women may come from the Old English word ‘burde’, which meant young lady. Others deny this, suggesting it developed more recently and independently of ‘burde’. | Some online sources suggest, as noted by many on social media, the current use of the word ‘bird’ for women may come from the Old English word ‘burde’, which meant young lady. Others deny this, suggesting it developed more recently and independently of ‘burde’. |
| While its usage is certainly less common than it has been, bird is still very much in circulation in the UK. | While its usage is certainly less common than it has been, bird is still very much in circulation in the UK. |
| If you like this story, share it with a friend! | If you like this story, share it with a friend! |
Previous version
1
Next version