This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/entertainment/8056208.stm

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Allen wins $5m court settlement Woody Allen wins $5m settlement
(41 minutes later)
Woody Allen has won a $5m (£3.3m) out-of-court settlement from American Apparel after the US company used his image on adverts without consent.Woody Allen has won a $5m (£3.3m) out-of-court settlement from American Apparel after the US company used his image on adverts without consent.
He sued the clothing firm for using an image of him from his 1977 film Annie Hall without permission on billboards.He sued the clothing firm for using an image of him from his 1977 film Annie Hall without permission on billboards.
The firm had initially planned to bring up his personal life in its defence.The firm had initially planned to bring up his personal life in its defence.
American Apparel had argued Allen was not worth the $10m he was originally seeking because of the controversy surrounding his family life.American Apparel had argued Allen was not worth the $10m he was originally seeking because of the controversy surrounding his family life.
Speaking outside court in New York, Allen said he thought it was "the largest reported amount ever paid under the New York right to privacy law". I sued American Apparel because they calculatingly took my name, likeness and image and used them publicly to promote their business Woody Allen
Reading from a statement outside Manhattan federal court, where the case had been due to take place, Allen said he hoped the outcome "would discourage American Apparel or anyone else from ever trying such a thing again". Speaking outside Manhattan federal court in New York - where the case had been due to take place - Allen said $5m was "enough to discourage American Apparel or anyone else from ever trying such a thing again".
He said: "I sued American Apparel because they calculatingly took my name, likeness and image and used them publicly to promote their business.
"Testimony revealed that American Apparel believed that fear of publicity would keep me from ever taking action."
He said a scheme "to call a long list of witnesses who had obviously nothing to do with this case" had been rejected by the court.
"I suspect this dose of legal reality led to their 11th-hour settlement," he said.
Meanwhile, American Apparel founder Dov Charney, who had the idea for the adverts - which also appeared on a website - told reporters the case was about "the dignity of ideas".Meanwhile, American Apparel founder Dov Charney, who had the idea for the adverts - which also appeared on a website - told reporters the case was about "the dignity of ideas".
"I am not sorry for expressing myself," he said."I am not sorry for expressing myself," he said.
'Free speech''Free speech'
Allen, 73, who does not endorse products in the US, had said he had not authorised the use of the image, which depicted him dressed as an Hasidic Jew.Allen, 73, who does not endorse products in the US, had said he had not authorised the use of the image, which depicted him dressed as an Hasidic Jew.
Woody Allen and Soon-Yi Previn's relationship sparked headlinesWoody Allen and Soon-Yi Previn's relationship sparked headlines
Last week, the company's legal teams dismissed reports that it would bring up Allen's relationships with wife Soon-Yi Previn and ex-partner Mia Farrow as part of its defence.Last week, the company's legal teams dismissed reports that it would bring up Allen's relationships with wife Soon-Yi Previn and ex-partner Mia Farrow as part of its defence.
In 1992, Allen's then-girlfriend Farrow discovered he was having an affair with her adopted daughter Soon-Yi, then 22.In 1992, Allen's then-girlfriend Farrow discovered he was having an affair with her adopted daughter Soon-Yi, then 22.
American Apparel had earlier alleged that the relationship breakdown led to headlines around the world which had made the image worth less than the $10m (£6.5m) Allen was initially suing for.American Apparel had earlier alleged that the relationship breakdown led to headlines around the world which had made the image worth less than the $10m (£6.5m) Allen was initially suing for.
But last week, the company's lawyer Stuart Slotnick said the trial would, instead, focus on the right to free speech.But last week, the company's lawyer Stuart Slotnick said the trial would, instead, focus on the right to free speech.
"At trial we will explain how the use of the image from the Annie Hall film was used to make a social statement and address social issues that were already subject to public discourse," he said."At trial we will explain how the use of the image from the Annie Hall film was used to make a social statement and address social issues that were already subject to public discourse," he said.
American Apparel had apologised for using Allen's image in the billboards, which were taken down within a week of going up.American Apparel had apologised for using Allen's image in the billboards, which were taken down within a week of going up.