This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/live/2021/nov/29/australia-news-live-updates-omicron-variant-detected-nsw-states-tighten-border-restrictions-covid-scott-morrison-vaccine-daniel-andrews-victoria-sydney

The article has changed 23 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 15 Version 16
Australia politics live update: new Covid variant Omicron detected in Sydney and NT; parliament to sit for just 10 days in first half of 2022 Australia politics live update: new Covid variant Omicron detected in Sydney and NT; parliament to sit for just 10 days in first half of 2022
(32 minutes later)
Follow all the news liveFollow all the news live
And the big issues
Over in the senate, a condolence motion is being held for Alex Gallacher
Here is how Mike Bowers saw QT:
Just for those playing guess-the-election-date game (which is fruitless, you have be warned) there can still be an election before May, despite what the sitting calendar proposes.Just for those playing guess-the-election-date game (which is fruitless, you have be warned) there can still be an election before May, despite what the sitting calendar proposes.
There can be an election any time Scott Morrison wants one (before 22 May).There can be an election any time Scott Morrison wants one (before 22 May).
Sittings just get cancelled.Sittings just get cancelled.
Labor is assuming that the election, based on those sittings, would be held in May, which would delay parliament’s return until August (because of the break between elections and new sittings).Labor is assuming that the election, based on those sittings, would be held in May, which would delay parliament’s return until August (because of the break between elections and new sittings).
Just so you can see what that looks like – here is the sitting calendar the government has proposed.Just so you can see what that looks like – here is the sitting calendar the government has proposed.
The sitting calendar has been released.The sitting calendar has been released.
Tony Burke says he can’t remember a sitting calendar where there were less sitting days in the first half of the year.Tony Burke says he can’t remember a sitting calendar where there were less sitting days in the first half of the year.
None in January – that is normal.None in January – that is normal.
Seven in February – that is not normal.Seven in February – that is not normal.
THREE in March – that is definitely not normal. The three days in March are set for the budget.THREE in March – that is definitely not normal. The three days in March are set for the budget.
The parliament then doesn’t sit again until August.The parliament then doesn’t sit again until August.
So that makes 10 sittings days from Friday until 9 August.So that makes 10 sittings days from Friday until 9 August.
Kristy McBain to Scott Morrison:Kristy McBain to Scott Morrison:
The prime minister proclaimed his emergency response fund would fund immediately response activities [to the tune of] $200 million every year. Why then did the prime minister spend nothing for two years and has only recently spent the first $17 million. With people in my electorate still living in caravans and parts of NSW now flooded, why didn’t the prime minister use the money for immediate response activities like he said he would?The prime minister proclaimed his emergency response fund would fund immediately response activities [to the tune of] $200 million every year. Why then did the prime minister spend nothing for two years and has only recently spent the first $17 million. With people in my electorate still living in caravans and parts of NSW now flooded, why didn’t the prime minister use the money for immediate response activities like he said he would?
Morrison:Morrison:
*That is a shout out to Andrew Constance, who Morrison wants to run in the Labor seat of Gilmore. Constance and Morrison were on the outs during the bushfires, but have since made amends. The branch has not agreed to preselect Constance, so there is a bit of a fight brewing – Morrison is reportedly looking at using special powers to install who he wants, which risks a war with the branches more widely.*That is a shout out to Andrew Constance, who Morrison wants to run in the Labor seat of Gilmore. Constance and Morrison were on the outs during the bushfires, but have since made amends. The branch has not agreed to preselect Constance, so there is a bit of a fight brewing – Morrison is reportedly looking at using special powers to install who he wants, which risks a war with the branches more widely.
Scott Morrison is going on about “technology not taxes” again, as well as non-existent mandates in regards to Labor’s (still-to-be-announced) climate policy (there was never an electric vehicle mandate).Scott Morrison is going on about “technology not taxes” again, as well as non-existent mandates in regards to Labor’s (still-to-be-announced) climate policy (there was never an electric vehicle mandate).
Putting aside that the government’s ‘plan’ relies on yet to be developed technologies, there are those who have looked at the modelling released by the government on its net zero by 2050 plan and found the government has embedded ... a carbon price.Putting aside that the government’s ‘plan’ relies on yet to be developed technologies, there are those who have looked at the modelling released by the government on its net zero by 2050 plan and found the government has embedded ... a carbon price.
Don’t believe me? Here is the AFR on that exact point earlier this month:Don’t believe me? Here is the AFR on that exact point earlier this month:
Anthony Albanese will be the interview guest on ABC 7.30 tonight.Anthony Albanese will be the interview guest on ABC 7.30 tonight.
Tanya Plibersek to Scott Morrison:Tanya Plibersek to Scott Morrison:
What impact will the government’s proposed controls on social media have on the reported activities of the Member for Bowman?What impact will the government’s proposed controls on social media have on the reported activities of the Member for Bowman?
Morrison:Morrison:
There is now an argument about whether or not the prime minister’s answer is relevant or whether the question is asking for a legal opinion.There is now an argument about whether or not the prime minister’s answer is relevant or whether the question is asking for a legal opinion.
We don’t really resolve that, but Morrison is brought back to the question.We don’t really resolve that, but Morrison is brought back to the question.
Morrison:Morrison:
Just wondering how many young people and women have the resources to begin defamation actions?Just wondering how many young people and women have the resources to begin defamation actions?
There is no bill – it is meant to be coming very soon, but right now, no one knows what is in it, beyond what the government says is in it. Social media platforms are already counted as publishers. State laws cover a lot of what the government says this bill will be able to do. It does not ban ‘anonymous’ accounts, and it does not make it any easier to unmask an anonymous account. We don’t know what will happen if the account in question has an international IP address. Plus, the laws will give you, best case scenario, an email address. That’s about it.There is no bill – it is meant to be coming very soon, but right now, no one knows what is in it, beyond what the government says is in it. Social media platforms are already counted as publishers. State laws cover a lot of what the government says this bill will be able to do. It does not ban ‘anonymous’ accounts, and it does not make it any easier to unmask an anonymous account. We don’t know what will happen if the account in question has an international IP address. Plus, the laws will give you, best case scenario, an email address. That’s about it.
Catherine King to Scott Morrison:Catherine King to Scott Morrison:
Does the prime minister’s model of a national anti-corruption commission have the power to investigate the purchase of land in the Leppington Triangle for 10 times its actual value?Does the prime minister’s model of a national anti-corruption commission have the power to investigate the purchase of land in the Leppington Triangle for 10 times its actual value?
Morrison sends this one to Paul Fletcher:Morrison sends this one to Paul Fletcher:
So apparently, the government can’t bring on its bill, in the chamber where it has a majority, because the opposition won’t support it.So apparently, the government can’t bring on its bill, in the chamber where it has a majority, because the opposition won’t support it.
The opposition does not support the voter ID legislation (among countless others) and that has been introduced, so it doesn’t really seem to make sense.The opposition does not support the voter ID legislation (among countless others) and that has been introduced, so it doesn’t really seem to make sense.
Peter Dutton finishes with this (which is becoming one of the pseudo election slogans):
Peter Dutton is doing his now daily “How safe are you, defence edition” dixer.
Richard Marles to Scott Morrison:
Does the prime minister’s model of an anti-corruption commission have the power to investigate the energy minister meeting the environment department about an investigation into illegal poisoning of endangered grasslands on land on which he had a financial interest?
Morrison:
“Mr Frivolous,” yells someone from the government benches, which many on the government side find HILARIOUS.
The minister representing the attorney general does not take the question.
Anthony Albanese to Scott Morrison:
I note it has now been more than 1,000 days since the prime minister announced a national anti-corruption commission. It is the last week of parliament for the year. Isn’t the prime minister delaying the legislation to make sure a national anti-corruption commission won’t be established this term?
Morrison:
Again, there is no bill from the government – there is an exposure draft.
So Albanese asks Morrison to table the legislation. Peter Dutton denies leave.
(So the government just refused leave to table its own ‘legislation’ that the prime minister was just talking about – because it is not actually legislation, it is an exposure draft.)
In case you missed this in the Senate.
Jim Chalmers to Josh Frydenberg:
If he doesn’t know how many funds in his budget are allocated at the discretion of the minister and the total value, we provide this answer at the end of today’s Question Time. Shouldn’t the Treasurer know how much of his trillion dollars in debt he has borrowed to spray around marginal seats?
Frydenberg (who now has a document to read from)
Frydenberg decides he has said enough and sits down.
Chalmers asks him to table the document.
Andrew Wallace asks Frydenberg if it is a confidential document, and Frydenberg says no, it’s publicly available. Tony Burke enters the fray and says in that case, he needs to table it, because Wallace didn’t ask if it was publicly available, he asked if it was confidential. Wallace seems lost. Peter Dutton gives him an out.
We move on.
Jim Chalmers to Josh Frydenberg:
How many funds in his budget are allocated at the discretion of the minister and what is the total value?
That’s related to this story from Murph:
Frydenberg (who does not seem at all prepared for this question)
Greg Hunt is using his statesman voice again for dixers.
That’s how you know the government is back in your life.
He keeps pointing out Australia’s low fatality rate from Covid – which is true, thanks to the border closure. But where did most of the fatalities occur? Aged care homes. Which are a federal government responsibility.
Andrew Wallace is still struggling in the Speaker’s chair.
He is now saying he is “not in a position to determine whether the treasurer should allocate a certain percentage of his answer” to a particular topic. That’s after Josh Frydenberg spent almost his entire answer speaking about “alternative approaches” of the opposition – which is just an excuse to sledge Labor on the floor of the parliament.
Tony Burke points out that determining how much of an answer can be dedicated to something is kinda the Speaker’s job:
Wallace says the treasurer is relevant.
All is going really well with the new Speaker. He is totally nailing the bipartisan thing (upside down head emoji).
Scott Morrison ends his answer to Bob Katter with this attack on Labor – which takes Peter Dutton’s commentary and steps it up: