This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/england/gloucestershire/8100126.stm

The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 5 Version 6
Council loses £1m sickness case Council loses £1m sickness case
(29 minutes later)
A council has lost its High Court case against a former managing director after claiming she withheld a history of depressive illness.A council has lost its High Court case against a former managing director after claiming she withheld a history of depressive illness.
Cheltenham Borough Council was suing Christine Laird, 52, for £1m.Cheltenham Borough Council was suing Christine Laird, 52, for £1m.
Mrs Laird was appointed in 2002, but left in 2005 on an ill-health pension after taking sick leave on full pay.Mrs Laird was appointed in 2002, but left in 2005 on an ill-health pension after taking sick leave on full pay.
The council had claimed it suffered financial losses amounting to more than £1m including interest as a result of Mrs Laird's "deceit".The council had claimed it suffered financial losses amounting to more than £1m including interest as a result of Mrs Laird's "deceit".
'Disastrous time'
Andrew North, Chief Executive of Cheltenham Borough Council, said the authority was disappointed with the judgement.Andrew North, Chief Executive of Cheltenham Borough Council, said the authority was disappointed with the judgement.
"While the outcome is not what we had hoped for, we felt we had a duty to take action to recover losses for what we felt was a disastrous time for the council."While the outcome is not what we had hoped for, we felt we had a duty to take action to recover losses for what we felt was a disastrous time for the council.
Christine's mental health has been cruelly broken. The personal cost of all this for us is not financial - the price was so nearly her life. Hugh Laird - Husband class="" href="/2/hi/uk_news/8100429.stm">What must you tell your boss? Hugh Laird said the case nearly cost his wife her life
"Had the council known Mrs Laird's medical history it would most probably not have employed her and incurred the costs it has."Had the council known Mrs Laird's medical history it would most probably not have employed her and incurred the costs it has.
"Undoubtedly the council went through a very difficult time between 2002 and 2005 and we are now a very different organisation to the council which Mrs Laird was appointed to lead.""Undoubtedly the council went through a very difficult time between 2002 and 2005 and we are now a very different organisation to the council which Mrs Laird was appointed to lead."
Mrs Laird's husband Hugh Laird, speaking outside the High Court in London, said: "Christine's mental health has been cruelly broken.Mrs Laird's husband Hugh Laird, speaking outside the High Court in London, said: "Christine's mental health has been cruelly broken.
"The personal cost of all this for us is not financial - the price was so nearly her life."The personal cost of all this for us is not financial - the price was so nearly her life.
Chief Executive, Mind: "This is an important message to employers and employees"
"Christine fought and won this court case. Now she will start the long fight to win back her health with the love and prayers of her friends and family."Christine fought and won this court case. Now she will start the long fight to win back her health with the love and prayers of her friends and family.
"All of us are determined that she will make a full recovery.""All of us are determined that she will make a full recovery."
'Bitter dispute'
Mrs Laird, 52, told the High Court in March that she believed the appointment was "unconditional" and there had been no requirement for a medical report.Mrs Laird, 52, told the High Court in March that she believed the appointment was "unconditional" and there had been no requirement for a medical report.
She said she had given accurate information about her past.She said she had given accurate information about her past.
Mr Justice Hamblen dismissed the council's action, but also rejected a counterclaim by Mrs Laird for damages.Mr Justice Hamblen dismissed the council's action, but also rejected a counterclaim by Mrs Laird for damages.
Chief Executive, Mind: "This is an important message to employers and employees"
The judge said: "It is over eight years since Mrs Laird joined the council and much of the intervening period has been spent in bitter dispute before various tribunals, at much personal and financial cost."The judge said: "It is over eight years since Mrs Laird joined the council and much of the intervening period has been spent in bitter dispute before various tribunals, at much personal and financial cost."
'Forced out'
He added: "I very much hope that a line can now finally be drawn, allowing Mrs Laird to get on with her life and the council to get on with the business of governing Cheltenham."He added: "I very much hope that a line can now finally be drawn, allowing Mrs Laird to get on with her life and the council to get on with the business of governing Cheltenham."
Mrs Laird said at the hearing in March that the work she did for the council was worth at least £1.5m in efficiency savings because of her financial and local housing expertise.Mrs Laird said at the hearing in March that the work she did for the council was worth at least £1.5m in efficiency savings because of her financial and local housing expertise.
She claimed this resulted in a £30m benefit for the council.She claimed this resulted in a £30m benefit for the council.
In court Mrs Laird said she had been forced out of office by a poor working atmosphere on the local authority and council members who opposed her implementation of restructuring departments.In court Mrs Laird said she had been forced out of office by a poor working atmosphere on the local authority and council members who opposed her implementation of restructuring departments.
The legal costs for the action are expected to run into hundreds of thousands of pounds.The legal costs for the action are expected to run into hundreds of thousands of pounds.