This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk/8114523.stm

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Public funds for Charles top £3m Public funds for Charles top £3m
(40 minutes later)
Taxpayers funded the Prince of Wales to the tune of £3m last year - an annual rise of almost a quarter, according to the latest Clarence House accounts. Taxpayers funded the work of the Prince of Wales to the tune of £3m last year - an annual rise of almost a quarter, according to Clarence House accounts.
The main cost was a 48% rise in official travel by air and rail, which increased to £1,71m. The main cost was a 48% rise in official travel by air and rail, which increased to £1.71m.
He travelled more than 50,000 miles to attend 658 official engagements during his 60th birthday year.
Charles's private income increased by just 1% to £16.4m during the last financial year.Charles's private income increased by just 1% to £16.4m during the last financial year.
He also paid less tax, with his bill falling almost 10% from more than £3.4m to just under £3.1m.He also paid less tax, with his bill falling almost 10% from more than £3.4m to just under £3.1m.
Taxpayers pay for the prince's work through government grant-in-aid payments, which fund independently-operated organisations. The prince's non-official expenditure fell by 23% to £1.7m, with the drop being attributed in part to his decision to holiday in the UK last year.
Campaign group Republic - which is pressing for an elected head of state - has called on the government to stop funding his work.
We're asking the government why they continue to subsidise this profit-making enterprise to the tune of over £2m a year Graham Smith, Republic
But the prince's senior aide, Sir Michael Peat, said Charles had been mindful of the economic downturn.
"It's a recession and we have to say that we've looked at all costs very carefully," he said.
"We are by no means immune to it. We are always reviewing all costs the whole time."
The annual review suggests the prince helped to raise £130m in support of his 20 core charities.
A keen environmental campaigner, Prince Charles also presided over a 7% cut in carbon emissions at Clarence House during the year to April.
Fossil fuel use was reduced by 15%, the report said.
In the year to April, the surplus generated by the Duchy of Cornwall - the landed estate given to the heir to the throne - increased by only £185,000.
This private income had risen by 7% during the previous year.
Clarence House said Charles spent "well over half" of this £16.4m after-tax income in support of official and charitable activities.
'No burden'
However, taxpayers supplement this work through government grant-in-aid payments, which fund independently-operated organisations.
The last financial year saw these payments jump 23.5% from £2.45m to £3.03m, while Charles's official expenditure rose by nearly a fifth from to £10.45m to £12.5m.The last financial year saw these payments jump 23.5% from £2.45m to £3.03m, while Charles's official expenditure rose by nearly a fifth from to £10.45m to £12.5m.
In the year to April 2008, the prince's private income had risen by 7%. Author Ingrid Seward, who has written extensively about the Royal Family, told the BBC that Charles offered "value for money" and was "no burden" on the taxpayer.
However, the following 12 months saw the surplus generated by the Duchy of Cornwall - the landed estate given to the heir to the throne - increase by only £185,000 to nearly £16.5m. "When Prince Charles goes on foreign trips it's not [simply] because he wants to, it's because he's invited by foreign countries and it must be paid for because he's a great ambassador," she said.
However, Republic spokesman Graham Smith said: "In the depths of a recession, Prince Charles is obviously quite capable of making a multi-million pound profit from the Duchy.
"We're asking the government why they continue to subsidise this profit-making enterprise to the tune of over £2m a year."