This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk_politics/8115870.stm

The article has changed 12 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 9 Version 10
Ministers win Iraq inquiry vote Government wins Iraq inquiry vote
(29 minutes later)
A Tory attempt to have the Iraq inquiry heard "whenever possible" in public has been defeated in the Commons.A Tory attempt to have the Iraq inquiry heard "whenever possible" in public has been defeated in the Commons.
But the government's majority was cut to 39 votes as MPs rejected the motion by 299 to 260 votes.But the government's majority was cut to 39 votes as MPs rejected the motion by 299 to 260 votes.
Gordon Brown initially said the inquiry would be private but has since said some sessions could be public.Gordon Brown initially said the inquiry would be private but has since said some sessions could be public.
But Tory, Lib Dem and some Labour MPs raised concerns about how much would be public, the inquiry's remit and whether evidence would be under oath. But Tory, Lib Dem and some Labour MPs raised concerns about how much would be public, the inquiry's remit and whether evidence would be taken under oath.
A government amendment, welcoming its announcement of the "wide ranging and independent" inquiry, was passed by 305 votes to 251.A government amendment, welcoming its announcement of the "wide ranging and independent" inquiry, was passed by 305 votes to 251.
Terms of reference
The Conservatives called the Commons debate after Mr Brown told MPs last week the inquiry would be in private.The Conservatives called the Commons debate after Mr Brown told MPs last week the inquiry would be in private.
Amid much criticism, he later said it was up to the inquiry's chairman, Sir John Chilcot, to hold some sessions in public if he chose to.Amid much criticism, he later said it was up to the inquiry's chairman, Sir John Chilcot, to hold some sessions in public if he chose to.
But opposition parties and some Labour MPs wanted further assurances about how much would be heard in public. BBC political correspondent Carole Walker said the vote's result was not surprising, after Gordon Brown had made some concessions by allowing much of the inquiry to be held in public.
Many MPs also said leaving the terms of reference - and issue of whether witnesses should give evidence under oath - to Sir John to decide was "unfair". It needs to be comprehensive, independent, not a trial or an impeachment but an effort to learn for the future David MilibandForeign Secretary class="" href="/2/hi/uk_news/politics/8114992.stm">Brown denies Iraq inquiry U-turn class="" href="/2/hi/uk_news/politics/8113634.stm">Chairman urges public Iraq probe
They wanted MPs to scrutinise the remit, debate and vote upon it. But during the debate several MPs said they were still not clear, from what the government said, about how much would be private.
Many MPs also said leaving the terms of reference - and issue of whether witnesses should give evidence under oath - to Sir John to decide was "unfair". They wanted MPs to scrutinise the remit, debate and vote upon it.
And there have been calls for people with military and ministerial experience to serve on the inquiry's panel.
'Made a mess'
Speaking after the vote former Conservative leader Iain Duncan Smith said late vague concessions from the government were "no good".
He told the BBC: "The House of Commons should decide this, the House of Commons should vote on it, we should not just leave it to someone who was never elected to decide where the committee goes."
During the debate shadow foreign secretary William Hague said Mr Brown had made a "mess" of announcing the inquiry by producing proposals for a "secretive, behind-closed-doors inquiry".
He added the membership was too restricted while the timing of the inquiry - which is due to report back after the next election - was "utterly cynical and politically motivated".
It suits the government to have us believe that the inquiry will be mostly in public, but I have my doubts David HeathLiberal Democrats
Since then he said the government had "engaged in a series of climbdowns - a U-turn executed in stages" and had relied on Sir John to announce changes, rather than having a minister return to the Commons "and admit that the government were in the wrong".
The government has pointed out the Conservatives had been asking for a Franks-style inquiry - a reference to the committee that reviewed the Falklands War - which was partly held in private.
But Mr Hague said several important elements of the Franks inquiry were "completely missing" while the one government had retained - holding it in private - was widely regarded as "no longer appropriate".
Under oath
He said it was "unfair" to Sir John to leave him to clarify all the terms and rules and said they should be put to MPs for scrutiny.
Senior Tory Michael Ancram warned that the inquiry's remit could end up being so "open and vague" that Sir John was being asked to "do the impossible".
Foreign Secretary David Miliband said all parties agreed there was a need for an inquiry adding: "It needs to be comprehensive, independent, not a trial or an impeachment but an effort to learn for the future."
David Miliband: "It can praise or blame whoever it likes"
He confirmed it would have access to all cabinet papers, papers from foreign governments and appeared to confirm it would have access to the original legal advice to cabinet on the legality of the war.
But he said it was "right and proper to leave the discretion" on whether evidence should be given under oath, to Sir John.
However Clare Short, the former cabinet minister who resigned as a Labour MP over the war, and former Lib Dem leader Sir Menzies Campbell said the issue should be decided by MPs.
But, in what opposition parties say is a further concession from the government, the foreign secretary also said the inquiry would be free to "praise or blame whoever it likes".
The prime minster had told MPs last week the inquiry would "not set out to apportion blame".
Labour backbencher Gordon Prentice said he was still unclear about how much of the inquiry would be in public.
He said a briefing note circulated to Labour MPs had said the inquiry would "sit in private with scope for public events and hearings" - he believed it should have been the other way around.
Mr Miliband said Sir John had already said "as much as possible" should be public.
But for the Liberal Democrats, David Heath demanded to know the criteria for closed sessions.
He added: "It suits the government to have us believe that the inquiry will be mostly in public, but I have my doubts."
Labour MPs Bob Marshall-Andrews and Paul Flynn both said the key question for the inquiry was whether Britain was "deceived" into going to war in Iraq.
Tory leader David Cameron says Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and Alastair Campbell [Tony Blair's former press secretary] must give evidence in public.
Earlier the prime minister's spokesman said Mr Brown would have "no difficulty in giving evidence in public", if national security considerations were met.