This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/explainers-61782866

The article has changed 66 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 35 Version 36
What is the UK's plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda? What is the UK's plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda?
(about 4 hours later)
The UK government wants to send some asylum seekers to Rwanda.The UK government wants to send some asylum seekers to Rwanda.
It is proposing new laws to overcome legal obstacles after the Supreme Court said its plan was unlawful.It is proposing new laws to overcome legal obstacles after the Supreme Court said its plan was unlawful.
What is the Rwanda asylum plan?What is the Rwanda asylum plan?
Some asylum seekers arriving in the UK would be sent to Rwanda, to have their claims processed there, during a five-year trial.Some asylum seekers arriving in the UK would be sent to Rwanda, to have their claims processed there, during a five-year trial.
If successful, they could be granted refugee status and allowed to stay. If not, they could apply to settle in Rwanda on other grounds, or seek asylum in another "safe third country".If successful, they could be granted refugee status and allowed to stay. If not, they could apply to settle in Rwanda on other grounds, or seek asylum in another "safe third country".
Anyone "entering the UK illegally" after 1 January 2022 could be sent there, the government said, with no limit on numbers.Anyone "entering the UK illegally" after 1 January 2022 could be sent there, the government said, with no limit on numbers.
Ministers argue the Rwanda plan would deter people from arriving in the UK on small boats across the English Channel.Ministers argue the Rwanda plan would deter people from arriving in the UK on small boats across the English Channel.
However, when the scheme was first announced, the most senior civil servant in the Home Office said there was little evidence the plan would have a deterrent effect "significant enough to make the policy value for money".However, when the scheme was first announced, the most senior civil servant in the Home Office said there was little evidence the plan would have a deterrent effect "significant enough to make the policy value for money".
No asylum seeker has yet been sent to Rwanda, a small landlocked country in east-central Africa, 4,000 miles (6,500km) from the UK.No asylum seeker has yet been sent to Rwanda, a small landlocked country in east-central Africa, 4,000 miles (6,500km) from the UK.
The first flight was scheduled to go in June 2022, but was cancelled after legal challenges.The first flight was scheduled to go in June 2022, but was cancelled after legal challenges.
How many people cross the Channel in small boats?How many people cross the Channel in small boats?
What was the Supreme Court ruling and is Rwanda safe?What was the Supreme Court ruling and is Rwanda safe?
In November 2023, the UK Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the Rwanda scheme was unlawful.In November 2023, the UK Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the Rwanda scheme was unlawful.
It said genuine refugees sent there would be at risk of being returned to their home countries, where they could face harm.It said genuine refugees sent there would be at risk of being returned to their home countries, where they could face harm.
This breaches the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which prohibits torture and inhuman treatment. The UK is a signatory to the ECHR.This breaches the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which prohibits torture and inhuman treatment. The UK is a signatory to the ECHR.
The ruling also cited concerns about Rwanda's poor human rights record, and its past treatment of refugees.The ruling also cited concerns about Rwanda's poor human rights record, and its past treatment of refugees.
The Supreme Court said that in 2021, the UK government had itself criticised Rwanda for its "extrajudicial killings, deaths in custody, enforced disappearances and torture".The Supreme Court said that in 2021, the UK government had itself criticised Rwanda for its "extrajudicial killings, deaths in custody, enforced disappearances and torture".
It also highlighted an incident in 2018, when Rwandan police opened fire on protesting refugees.It also highlighted an incident in 2018, when Rwandan police opened fire on protesting refugees.
How the UK's asylum deal is viewed in RwandaHow the UK's asylum deal is viewed in Rwanda
Land of safety - or fear? Why Rwanda divides opinionLand of safety - or fear? Why Rwanda divides opinion
What is in the new Rwanda bill?What is in the new Rwanda bill?
After the Supreme Court ruling, the government introduced a new bill to make clear in UK law that Rwanda is a safe country.After the Supreme Court ruling, the government introduced a new bill to make clear in UK law that Rwanda is a safe country.
The legislation - which must be approved by both Houses of Parliament - orders the courts to ignore key sections of the Human Rights Act, in an attempt to sidestep the Supreme Court's judgement.The legislation - which must be approved by both Houses of Parliament - orders the courts to ignore key sections of the Human Rights Act, in an attempt to sidestep the Supreme Court's judgement.
It also orders the courts to ignore other British laws or international rules - such as the international Refugee Convention - that stand in the way of deportations to Rwanda.It also orders the courts to ignore other British laws or international rules - such as the international Refugee Convention - that stand in the way of deportations to Rwanda.
Some MPs have criticised the legislation because they believe it breaks international law.Some MPs have criticised the legislation because they believe it breaks international law.
Why are some Tory MPs unhappy about the Rwanda bill?Why are some Tory MPs unhappy about the Rwanda bill?
Despite opposition from some Conservative MPs who wanted the legislation to go further, the bill was passed in the House of Commons on 17 January.Despite opposition from some Conservative MPs who wanted the legislation to go further, the bill was passed in the House of Commons on 17 January.
In the end, only 11 Conservative MPs voted against it, including former home secretary Suella Braverman.In the end, only 11 Conservative MPs voted against it, including former home secretary Suella Braverman.
It now goes to the House of Lords, where it is expected to face significant challenge. The bill now goes to the House of Lords, where it is expected to face significant challenge.
The Lords are unlikely to vote it down completely but they can propose changes which would delay its progress.
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said the Lords should "do the right thing", and that he wanted flights carrying asylum seekers to take off to Rwanda "as quickly as possible".
Rwanda rebellion is an assault on Sunak's authorityRwanda rebellion is an assault on Sunak's authority
What does the new treaty with Rwanda say?What does the new treaty with Rwanda say?
As well as introducing the Safety of Rwanda Bill, the UK government also signed a new migration treaty with Rwanda.As well as introducing the Safety of Rwanda Bill, the UK government also signed a new migration treaty with Rwanda.
Home Secretary James Cleverley says it guarantees that any people sent to Rwanda to claim asylum would not be at risk of being returned to their home countries.Home Secretary James Cleverley says it guarantees that any people sent to Rwanda to claim asylum would not be at risk of being returned to their home countries.
It also includes a new independent monitoring committee to ensure Rwanda complies with its obligations, and that British judges are included in a new appeals process.It also includes a new independent monitoring committee to ensure Rwanda complies with its obligations, and that British judges are included in a new appeals process.
What will the Rwanda plan cost?What will the Rwanda plan cost?
The UK government says it has paid £240m to Rwanda so far. A further payment of £50m is expected in the 2024-25 financial year.The UK government says it has paid £240m to Rwanda so far. A further payment of £50m is expected in the 2024-25 financial year.
The Labour Party estimates the government will pay about £400m to Rwanda under the scheme, but the government has not confirmed the total cost.The Labour Party estimates the government will pay about £400m to Rwanda under the scheme, but the government has not confirmed the total cost.
However, official figures suggest that removing each individual to a third country, such as Rwanda, costs £63,000 more than keeping them in the UK.However, official figures suggest that removing each individual to a third country, such as Rwanda, costs £63,000 more than keeping them in the UK.
Legal challenges meant the first Rwanda flight was cancelled shortly before take-off in June 2022Legal challenges meant the first Rwanda flight was cancelled shortly before take-off in June 2022
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak claimed that the Rwanda plan will "literally save us billions in the long run" but did not explain how.Prime Minister Rishi Sunak claimed that the Rwanda plan will "literally save us billions in the long run" but did not explain how.
The Home Office said there would be no cost if the policy prevents individuals from entering the UK.The Home Office said there would be no cost if the policy prevents individuals from entering the UK.
The UK's asylum system costs nearly £4bn a year, including about £8m a day on hotel accommodation.The UK's asylum system costs nearly £4bn a year, including about £8m a day on hotel accommodation.
Failure to process asylum claims efficiently "has led to unacceptable costs to the taxpayer", a report by MPs said in October 2023.Failure to process asylum claims efficiently "has led to unacceptable costs to the taxpayer", a report by MPs said in October 2023.
Rwandan Paul President Kagame offered to return money given to his country by the UK if no asylum seekers end up being sent there.Rwandan Paul President Kagame offered to return money given to his country by the UK if no asylum seekers end up being sent there.
A Rwandan government spokesperson later said the country had "no obligation" to repay the money, but may consider a refund if requested.A Rwandan government spokesperson later said the country had "no obligation" to repay the money, but may consider a refund if requested.
Related TopicsRelated Topics
Calais migrant crisisCalais migrant crisis
Refugees and asylum seekersRefugees and asylum seekers
UK Supreme CourtUK Supreme Court
Rishi SunakRishi Sunak
RwandaRwanda
MigrationMigration