This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk_politics/8143696.stm

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Expenses row MP survives meeting Expenses row MP survives meeting
(about 1 hour later)
Tory MP Jonathan Djanogly claims to have got the backing of his Huntingdon constituency party at a meeting to discuss concerns about his expenses.Tory MP Jonathan Djanogly claims to have got the backing of his Huntingdon constituency party at a meeting to discuss concerns about his expenses.
Mr Djanogly says he told the meeting claims he spent about £13,000 a year on an au pair were exaggerated. Mr Djanogly said he told the meeting claims he spent about £13,000 a year on an au pair were exaggerated.
Party sources reportedly said they may have sought to deselect the MP if he did not provide satisfactory answers. Constituency association chairman Martin Stephenson said the meeting had been called to "clear the air" and there was no question of deselection.
The shadow solicitor general has agreed to repay £25,000 in expenses claims made since 2004. The MP has agreed to repay £25,000 in expenses claims made since 2004.
But he told the 90-minute meeting in his Cambridgeshire constituency: "I stayed within the law and broke no rules when I made the claims for expenses." Mr Djanogly, shadow solicitor general, told the 90-minute meeting attended by about 200 people in his Cambridgeshire constituency: "I stayed within the law and broke no rules when I made the claims for expenses."
'Unified''Unified'
Speaking afterwards to the Cambridge Evening News, he said: "I was extremely pleased with the overwhelming support that the association has shown this evening. Mr Stephenson said the constituency executive committee had called the meeting to allow Mr Djanogly to explain his expenses and the reports in the press.
"It was a very open two-way conversation and I think it was a very unified meeting. "Written questions were submitted and many were very searching, as members needed answers.
"I think we all feel willing, strong, and more determined than ever to take the fight to this government." "But they were not all on expenses - some were on issues that the next Conservative government would take up.
"It was necessary to clear the air and for us to get on with the job of electing a new government, but most of the questions were on the allowances issue," Mr Stephenson admitted.
Mr Djanogly's predecessor as Huntingdon MP, former Prime Minister Sir John Major, is reported by The Daily Mail to have privately condemned Mr Djanogly's actions as "greedy" and "inappropriate".Mr Djanogly's predecessor as Huntingdon MP, former Prime Minister Sir John Major, is reported by The Daily Mail to have privately condemned Mr Djanogly's actions as "greedy" and "inappropriate".
Sir John's former election agent, Sir Peter Brown, quit as Mr Djanogly's agent last week, but insisted it was on health grounds and not linked to the expenses scandal. Mr Stephenson said he believed the rumours of this had been spread by one person and he had personally never heard Sir John make a personal attack on Mr Djanogly.
Mr Djanogly says his decision to repay £25,000 - one of the largest sums of any Tory MPs - was taken voluntarily, prior to the Daily Telegraph's first expenses allegations in May. "The meeting ended with a standing ovation and about 95% of the audience of about 200 people were on their feet.
He said he had made the move in acknowledgement of public anger over the expenses furore. "There is no reason to think that we will not be going into the next election with Jonathan Djanogly as our MP," he said.
'Valid claims''Valid claims'
The Daily Telegraph also alleged, over a four year period, he claimed up to £640 a month to pay a number of students to clean his second home in his constituency. The Daily Telegraph also alleged, over a four year period, Mr Djanogly claimed up to £640 a month to pay a number of students to clean his second home in his constituency.
The paper said one of those students had advertised herself as an au pair and that she lived in his main London home for most of the week.The paper said one of those students had advertised herself as an au pair and that she lived in his main London home for most of the week.
It said this raised questions whether public money was being used to subsidise child care costs.It said this raised questions whether public money was being used to subsidise child care costs.
But Mr Djanogly, who has two children, said the woman in question only worked as a cleaner.But Mr Djanogly, who has two children, said the woman in question only worked as a cleaner.
He said she lived rent free in his London home from Monday to Thursday, doing no work, and in his constituency home from Friday to Sunday while working there.He said she lived rent free in his London home from Monday to Thursday, doing no work, and in his constituency home from Friday to Sunday while working there.
He said she had replied to a job advert placed by his wife on a cleaners' website and he was not aware she had subsequently placed an ad on an au pairing site after she had started working for him in October 2007.He said she had replied to a job advert placed by his wife on a cleaners' website and he was not aware she had subsequently placed an ad on an au pairing site after she had started working for him in October 2007.
The MP said he had not claimed for the student's board and lodging from his parliamentary allowance.The MP said he had not claimed for the student's board and lodging from his parliamentary allowance.
"However, I did claim an average of £65 per week in respect of the cleaning work that the cleaner undertook in my constituency home," he said."However, I did claim an average of £65 per week in respect of the cleaning work that the cleaner undertook in my constituency home," he said.
"This was entirely commensurate with the cleaning work that they undertook and a valid claim.""This was entirely commensurate with the cleaning work that they undertook and a valid claim."