This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk_politics/8161912.stm

The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Expenses bill due to become law Expenses clean-up bill is passed
(about 1 hour later)
A bill aimed at cleaning up Parliament after the MPs' expenses scandal is due to get Royal Assent on Tuesday. A bill aimed at cleaning up Parliament after the MPs' expenses scandal has become law after getting Royal Assent.
Just weeks after the Parliamentary Standards Bill was introduced, it is due to be become law after a series of concessions by the government. Just weeks after the Parliamentary Standards Bill was introduced, it is now on the statute book after a series of concessions by the government.
The bill has been criticised by many MPs and peers for being rushed through and not properly thought out. The bill, which sets up an independent body to authorise MPs' expenses, was criticised by many MPs and peers for being rushed through.
But ministers say it is imperative the bill, which sets up an independent body to run MPs' expenses, is law by summer. Ministers said it was vital the bill became law before the summer recess.
When the bill was introduced as emergency legislation it included provisions for three new criminal offences for MPs, a wide-ranging legally binding code of conduct for MPs and was expected to apply eventually to peers as well as MPs. They said this was imperative for rebuilding public confidence in how Parliament works.
When the bill was introduced it included provisions for three new criminal offences for MPs, a wide-ranging legally binding code of conduct for MPs and was expected to apply eventually to peers as well as MPs.
Bill 'emasculated'Bill 'emasculated'
But as it returns to the Commons on Tuesday - two of the proposed offences have been dropped, as has the code of conduct while peers have been assured "categorically" it would not apply to them. But as it returned to the Commons on Tuesday - two of the proposed offences have been dropped, as has the code of conduct while peers have been assured "categorically" it would not apply to them.
And a move to allow MPs' words in the Commons - now protected by Parliamentary privilege - to be used against them in court was rejected after a surprise Commons defeat for the government.And a move to allow MPs' words in the Commons - now protected by Parliamentary privilege - to be used against them in court was rejected after a surprise Commons defeat for the government.
It was obvious that ministers had been required at very short notice to create a bill that had to match the prime minister's press release Alan DuncanShadow Commons leader The new rules for MPs explained Thankfully the expenses scandals will be a thing of the past Justice Secretary Jack Straw The new rules for MPs explained
Opening Tuesday's debate on amendments made in the House of Lords Justice Secretary Jack Straw faced accusations the bill had been rushed through for "public relations purposes" and had since been "emasculated". In Tuesday's debate on amendments made in the House of Lords Justice Secretary Jack Straw faced accusations the bill had been rushed through for "public relations purposes" and had since been "emasculated".
Mr Straw said "improvements" had been made to the bill and the three main parties had backed plans for a new Parliamentary Standards Authority but they had to work "from a standing start".Mr Straw said "improvements" had been made to the bill and the three main parties had backed plans for a new Parliamentary Standards Authority but they had to work "from a standing start".
He said it had been a difficult process and he would have been condemned if he had resisted making changes.He said it had been a difficult process and he would have been condemned if he had resisted making changes.
"I think we have achieved a very much better measure as a result," he said."I think we have achieved a very much better measure as a result," he said.
In a later interview, Mr Straw said the new authorisation process for expenses, combined with full transparency in the disclosure of claims, would mean past abuses could not happen again.
"Thankfully the expenses scandals will be a thing of the past," he told the BBC.
It was obvious that ministers had been required at very short notice to create a bill that had to match the prime minister's press release Alan DuncanShadow Commons leader
Shadow Commons leader Alan Duncan said the bill had arrived "in a state of some confusion" and he was pleased "significant" concessions had been made.Shadow Commons leader Alan Duncan said the bill had arrived "in a state of some confusion" and he was pleased "significant" concessions had been made.
"It was obvious that ministers had been required at very short notice to create a bill that had to match the prime minister's press release, initially at least, no matter what the consequences.""It was obvious that ministers had been required at very short notice to create a bill that had to match the prime minister's press release, initially at least, no matter what the consequences."
For the Lib Dems, David Heath said the passage of the bill had been muddled.
Although it had been improved by scrutiny, MPs should be allowed to revisit the legislation in future.
"We then went from having the Parliamentary Standards Act to a sort of amazing vanishing act as things disappeared in the face of very strong arguments."
The Lords amendments were passed without a vote, paving the way for the bill to become law.