This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk/8168448.stm
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
New rules 'threat to High Street' | New rules 'threat to High Street' |
(about 3 hours later) | |
Traditional high streets could be put at risk from out-of-town shopping areas unless proposed changes to planning rules are scrapped, MPs have said. | Traditional high streets could be put at risk from out-of-town shopping areas unless proposed changes to planning rules are scrapped, MPs have said. |
Ministers want to replace the "need test", which aims to prevent excessive retail park or supermarket development, with broader "impact assessments". | Ministers want to replace the "need test", which aims to prevent excessive retail park or supermarket development, with broader "impact assessments". |
However, the communities select committee wants it retained to prevent town centres being damaged. | However, the communities select committee wants it retained to prevent town centres being damaged. |
The Association of Convenience Stores has welcomed the MPs' report. | The Association of Convenience Stores has welcomed the MPs' report. |
The need test was created in response to complaints that smaller shops were being damaged by chains developing larger stores. | The need test was created in response to complaints that smaller shops were being damaged by chains developing larger stores. |
It forced planning committees to address whether the local community needed the proposed superstore. | It forced planning committees to address whether the local community needed the proposed superstore. |
'Undesirable effects' | 'Undesirable effects' |
However, a 2005 review of planning regulations found the test was having "undesirable effects", such as restricting competition and consumer choice. | However, a 2005 review of planning regulations found the test was having "undesirable effects", such as restricting competition and consumer choice. |
The government announced plans to scrap it two years later. | The government announced plans to scrap it two years later. |
In its report, the cross-party Commons committee said it was not convinced the test was having adverse effects. | In its report, the cross-party Commons committee said it was not convinced the test was having adverse effects. |
"On the contrary, we have heard from representatives of developers, of local planning groups, that it is serving a useful - some say essential - function," it said. | "On the contrary, we have heard from representatives of developers, of local planning groups, that it is serving a useful - some say essential - function," it said. |
The MPs said the timing of the change could worsen its effects. | The MPs said the timing of the change could worsen its effects. |
"In the current economic climate, the removal of the need test would present unnecessary risks to town centres," it concluded. | "In the current economic climate, the removal of the need test would present unnecessary risks to town centres," it concluded. |
Should development be contained to save High Streets? Is your town centre under threat? You can send us your comments using the form below: | |
A selection of your comments may be published, displaying your name and location unless you state otherwise in the box below. | |
The BBC may edit your comments and not all emails will be published. Your comments may be published on any BBC media worldwide. Terms & Conditions |