This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/technology/8177285.stm

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
File-sharer admits swapping songs File-sharer 'violated copyright'
(about 5 hours later)
A US student who faces millions of dollars in fines for illegally swapping music files has admitted that he shared and downloaded hundreds of songs. A US student could face $4.5m (£2.8m) in fines following a federal court ruling that he violated copyright law for sharing music files online.
Joel Tenenbaum is accused of copyright infringement by four recording labels for sharing tracks by artists such as Nirvana and Green Day. The jury must now decide on the amount of damages it will award to the four recording labels that are suing him.
It is only the second music-downloading case to go to trial in the US. Joel Tenenbaum admitted on the witness stand on Thursday that he had used file-sharing sites both to download and upload hundreds of songs.
In the first, single mother Jammie Thomas Rassett of Minnesota was ordered to pay $1.92m for sharing 24 songs. It is only the second music-downloading suit to go to trial in the US.
Mr Tenenbaum is accused of using a computer at his parents' home and at his college to download and distribute digital files. Last month saw the end of the first such suit, in which single mother Jammie Thomas-Rassett of Minnesota was ordered to pay $1.92m for sharing 24 songs.
Mr Tenenbaum used a computer at his parents' home and at his college to download and distribute digital files.
Prosecutors working on behalf of the record labels have focused on 30 shared songs.Prosecutors working on behalf of the record labels have focused on 30 shared songs.
Under US law, the recording companies are entitled to $750 to $30,000 per infringement. However, the jury can raise the amount to $150,000 per track if it finds the infringements were wilful. Under US law, the recording companies are entitled to $750 to $30,000 (£450-18,000) per infringement.
However, the jury can raise the amount to $150,000 (£91,000) per track if it finds the infringements were wilful - a matter that they will debate now that the judge has ruled Mr Tenenbaum violated copyright laws.
It was like this giant library in front of you Joel Tenenbaum
In the Minnesota case, the jury awarded $80,000 per song.In the Minnesota case, the jury awarded $80,000 per song.
On the stand, Mr Tenenbaum admitted that he had downloaded more than 800 songs since 1999 and that he had lied in pretrial proceedings when he suggested that other family members of friends may have been responsible for downloading songs to his computer. On the stand, Mr Tenenbaum admitted that he had downloaded more than 800 songs since 1999 and that he had lied in pre-trial proceedings when he suggested that other family members of friends may have been responsible for downloading songs to his computer.
"I used the computer. I uploaded, I downloaded music," he told the court under questioning from his own lawyer, "I used the computer. I uploaded, I downloaded music," he told the court under questioning from his own lawyer, Charles Nesson.
He said he had used Napster and then Kazaa to download the files.He said he had used Napster and then Kazaa to download the files.
"It was like this giant library in front of you," he said."It was like this giant library in front of you," he said.
In opening remarks on Tuesday Tenenbaum's lawyer said he "was a kid who did what kids do and loved technology and loved music".In opening remarks on Tuesday Tenenbaum's lawyer said he "was a kid who did what kids do and loved technology and loved music".
Recording companies had been slow to adapt to the internet, he added.Recording companies had been slow to adapt to the internet, he added.
But prosecutors argued that file-sharers take a significant toll on the revenues for artists and others involved in musicBut prosecutors argued that file-sharers take a significant toll on the revenues for artists and others involved in music
The recording industry has recently changed its tactics in file sharing cases, preferring to settle quickly for much smaller amounts.The recording industry has recently changed its tactics in file sharing cases, preferring to settle quickly for much smaller amounts.
However, cases such as those against Mr Tenenbaum, which were already filed, are proceeding to trial.However, cases such as those against Mr Tenenbaum, which were already filed, are proceeding to trial.
The four recording labels involved in the case are subsidiaries of Universal Music, Warner Music and Sony.The four recording labels involved in the case are subsidiaries of Universal Music, Warner Music and Sony.
The case continues at the US District Court in Boston.