This article is from the source 'rtcom' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.rt.com/pop-culture/566743-paining-eyes-verdict-overturned/

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Sentence of gallery guard who ‘fixed’ art overturned – media Sentence of museum guard who ‘fixed’ art overturned
(31 minutes later)
Adding eyes to figures on a pricey painting was not criminality, court decided Drawing eyes on figures on a valuable painting does not constitute a felony, a court has decided
An appellate judge in Russia has overturned the guilty verdict of a museum security guard who used a pen to ‘fix’ a painting by a student of avant-garde master Kazimir Malevich.An appellate judge in Russia has overturned the guilty verdict of a museum security guard who used a pen to ‘fix’ a painting by a student of avant-garde master Kazimir Malevich.
The actions of Aleksandr Vasilyev, who altered a work that was on display at the gallery he was guarding, did not constitute a felony, a judge in Yekaterinburg ruled, according to a TASS report from the courthouse on Friday. The actions of Aleksandr Vasilyev, who altered a work that was on display at the gallery he was guarding, do not constitute a felony, a judge in Ekaterinburg ruled, according to a TASS report from the courthouse on Friday.
The ruling struck down the punishment of 180 hours of community service and a court-mandated treatment at psych ward, which were part of Vasilyev’s initial sentence passed in late August by a magistrate judge at the same court. The ruling struck down the punishment of 180 hours of community service and court-mandated psychiatric treatment, which were part of Vasilyev’s initial sentence handed down in late August by a magistrate judge at the same court.
The new ruling said that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant had an intention to vandalize the piece of art. It also agreed with an expert witness, who argued that the act of adding eyes to faceless figures in the painting didn’t constitute its disfigurement and thus didn’t qualify as vandalism. The new ruling says that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant had the intention of vandalizing the work of art. It also agreed with an expert witness who argued that the act of adding eyes to the faceless figures in the painting does not constitute disfigurement and thus does not qualify as vandalism.
The incident happened in late 2021 at the Yeltsin Center museum in Yekaterinburg, which offered Vasilyev, who is in his 60s, the job of a security guard. It had on display the 1930s painting ‘Three Figures’ by Anna Leporskaya, which it had borrowed from the Tretyakov gallery in Moscow.  The incident happened in late 2021 at the Yeltsin Center Museum in Ekaterinburg, which employed Vasilyev, who is in his 60s, as a security guard. It had on display the 1930s painting ‘Three Figures’ by Anna Leporskaya, on loan from the Tretyakov Gallery in Moscow. 
During the initial trial, Vasilyev claimed that he thought the piece was a child’s work of little value when he took a ballpen to it. The owner put a 75-million-ruble ($1.24m) price tag on it and said restoring it cost 250,000 rubles ($4,130), which were paid by an insurance company. During the initial trial, Vasilyev claimed that he thought the piece was the work of a child and of little value when he took his pen to it. The owner estimated the value of the painting at 75 million rubles ($1.24 million) and said restoration cost 250,000 rubles ($4,138), which was paid by an insurance company.