This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/technology/8219652.stm

The article has changed 22 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 8 Version 9
UK file-sharers to be 'cut off' Anger at UK file-sharing policy
(about 2 hours later)
The government has published new measures that could see people who illegally download films and music cut off from the net. Internet service providers (ISPs) have reacted with anger to new proposals on how to tackle internet piracy.
The amendment to the Digital Britain report would see regulator Ofcom given greater powers to tackle pirates. The government is proposing a tougher stance which would include cutting off repeat offenders from the net.
The technical measures are likely to include suspending the net accounts of "hardcore copyright pirates". UK ISP Talk Talk said the recommendations were likely to "breach fundamental rights" and would not work.
It is believed that Business Secretary Lord Mandelson has intervened personally to beef up the policy. Virgin said that "persuasion not coercion" was key in the fight to crack down on the estimated six million file-sharers in the UK.
The Digital Britain report, published in June, gave Ofcom until 2012 to consider whether technical measures to catch pirates were necessary. TalkTalk's director of regulation Andrew Heaney told the BBC News the ISP was as keen as anyone to clamp down on illegal file-sharers.
"This is best done by making sure there are legal alternatives and educating people, writing letters to alleged file-sharers and, if necessary, taking them to court.
But introducing measures to simply cut people off will not work, he said.
"Disconnecting alleged offenders will be futile given that it is relatively easy for determined file-sharers to mask their identity or their activity to avoid detection," he added.
There are also concerns that the method of identifying offenders using the IP address of a specific machine may punish those who share a web connection.
A spokeswoman for Virgin Media was concerned that a "heavy-handed, punitive regime will simply alienate consumers".
It was also concerned about the costs of implementing such a system.
Listening carefully
Originally the Digital Britain report, published in June, gave Ofcom until 2012 to consider whether technical measures to catch pirates were necessary.
However, according to a statement from the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills released on Tuesday, that timeframe is now considered "too long to wait".However, according to a statement from the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills released on Tuesday, that timeframe is now considered "too long to wait".
Rupert Goodwins, technology expert and editor of ZD Net in the BBC studioRupert Goodwins, technology expert and editor of ZD Net in the BBC studio
Stephen Timms, minister for Digital Britain, explained the change of heart.Stephen Timms, minister for Digital Britain, explained the change of heart.
"We've been listening carefully to responses to the consultation this far, and it's become clear there are widespread concerns that the plans as they stand could delay action, impacting unfairly upon rights holders," he said."We've been listening carefully to responses to the consultation this far, and it's become clear there are widespread concerns that the plans as they stand could delay action, impacting unfairly upon rights holders," he said.
It proposes that internet service providers (ISPs) are obliged to take action against repeat infringers and suggests that the cost of tracking down persistent pirates be shared 50:50 between ISPs and rights holders.It proposes that internet service providers (ISPs) are obliged to take action against repeat infringers and suggests that the cost of tracking down persistent pirates be shared 50:50 between ISPs and rights holders.
The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills denied that it had changed its position since the publication of Digital Britain and said that the recommendations were open to consultation.The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills denied that it had changed its position since the publication of Digital Britain and said that the recommendations were open to consultation.
"We are simply adding new ideas to the table that could potentially make the whole system more flexible and provide a quicker way to bring in technical measures," it said in a statement."We are simply adding new ideas to the table that could potentially make the whole system more flexible and provide a quicker way to bring in technical measures," it said in a statement.
'Disproportionate''Disproportionate'
ISPs have repeatedly argued that it is not their job to police the web.ISPs have repeatedly argued that it is not their job to police the web.
The Internet Service Providers' Association (ISPA) said it was "disappointed by the proposal to force ISPs to suspend users' accounts".The Internet Service Providers' Association (ISPA) said it was "disappointed by the proposal to force ISPs to suspend users' accounts".
"ISPA and consumer groups consider disconnection of users to be a disproportionate response, a view that was recently supported by the European Parliament," it said in a statement."ISPA and consumer groups consider disconnection of users to be a disproportionate response, a view that was recently supported by the European Parliament," it said in a statement.
ILLEGAL FILE-SHARING File-sharing is not illegal. It only becomes illegal when users are sharing content, such as music, that is protected by copyrightsThe crackdown will be aimed at people who regularly use technologies, such as BitTorrent, and websites, such as The Pirate Bay, to find and download filesThere are plenty of legitimate file-sharing services such as the BBC's iPlayerILLEGAL FILE-SHARING File-sharing is not illegal. It only becomes illegal when users are sharing content, such as music, that is protected by copyrightsThe crackdown will be aimed at people who regularly use technologies, such as BitTorrent, and websites, such as The Pirate Bay, to find and download filesThere are plenty of legitimate file-sharing services such as the BBC's iPlayer
European politicians recently ruled that cutting off someone's internet connection could be a breach of their human rights. The challenge came in response to France's tough policy on file-sharers.European politicians recently ruled that cutting off someone's internet connection could be a breach of their human rights. The challenge came in response to France's tough policy on file-sharers.
ISPA also said that the changes had been proposed "without consultation with the internet industry".ISPA also said that the changes had been proposed "without consultation with the internet industry".
Andrew Ferguson, editor of broadband website ThinkBroadband, thinks the U-turn makes a mockery of the original Digital Britain report.
"One wonders why Stephen Carter bothered to write the Digital Britain report, we are seeing sections of it being dropped or rewritten, and this even before the 18 implementation projects have got off the ground," he said.
He is also concerned that suspending accounts could hit soft targets such as teenagers.
"Cutting off an internet connection could lead to serious ramifications for people, for example home workers where their teenagers use it in the evening," he said.
Campaign body the Open Rights Group (ORG) said the proposals raised a lot of issues.
"Removing peoples' ability to get online curtails their freedom of speech. There are issues about whether innocent people will be affected and those who share internet connections.
"It seems crazy that as the music and film industry are starting to make money online and file-sharing is reducing that the government goes for such a harsh clamp-down," said Jim Killock, executive director of ORG.
Global issueGlobal issue
However, the move has not been criticised by all. However, the u-turn has been welcomed by some.
The BPI, which represents the recorded music industry in Britain, welcomed the government's decision. BPI, which represents the recorded music industry in Britain, welcomed the government's decision.
"'Digital piracy is a serious problem and a real threat to the UK's creative industries," it said in a statement."'Digital piracy is a serious problem and a real threat to the UK's creative industries," it said in a statement.
"The solution to the piracy problem must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.""The solution to the piracy problem must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive."
HAVE YOUR SAYBy all means fine those who download illegally, but to cut them off from the internet would be taking away the right to free speech and communicationJanet Shaw, Romford, UK Send us your commentsHAVE YOUR SAYBy all means fine those who download illegally, but to cut them off from the internet would be taking away the right to free speech and communicationJanet Shaw, Romford, UK Send us your comments
Countries around the world are grappling with how to control internet piracy. In the US, student Joel Tenebaum was last month ordered to pay $675,000 (£412,000) to various record labels after admitting downloading 800 songs.Countries around the world are grappling with how to control internet piracy. In the US, student Joel Tenebaum was last month ordered to pay $675,000 (£412,000) to various record labels after admitting downloading 800 songs.
In May, the French parliament passed legislation which would see a new state-agency sending warning letters to file sharers. If they are caught three times, they will be cut off.In May, the French parliament passed legislation which would see a new state-agency sending warning letters to file sharers. If they are caught three times, they will be cut off.
There have been protests against similar proposed legislation in Australia and New Zealand.There have been protests against similar proposed legislation in Australia and New Zealand.
It is estimated that around seven million people in the UK are involved in illegal downloads with half of all the traffic on the net in the UK being content that is shared illegally. It is estimated that half of all the traffic on the net in the UK being content that is shared illegally.
The UK government has set a target of reducing the problem by at least 70% in the next few years.The UK government has set a target of reducing the problem by at least 70% in the next few years.
There has been speculation in the British press that Lord Mandelson intervened personally on the issue after meeting record label founder David Geffen. The games industry has already begun a clampdown of those illegally sharing videogames and the methods it uses would broadly be similar to those the music and film industry would rely on.
A spokesman for the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills denied the link. It uses a third body anti-piracy firm to identify alleged file-sharers and a court order is sent to the relevant internet service provider, forcing it to reveal the identity of the person behind the IP address.
"Lord Mandelson does not believe Digital Britain is even on David Geffen's radar. There was no discussion on this with Geffen," he said. Some 6,000 letters have been sent out by law firm ACS Law on behalf of firms such as Reality Pump and Topware Interactive who own video games Two Worlds and Dream Pinball respectively.
Rob Bratby, a partner with law firm Olswang thinks the pendulum could yet swing in favour of ISPs. Some 20 users have come forward to say they have been wrongly accused. All face fines of up to £665 or threat of court action.
"The rights holders have been successful in putting their views to government but expect some heavy lobbying from ISPs now," he said.