This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/mar/29/tory-row-brewing-rishi-sunak-pledge-end-small-boat-crossings

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Tory row brewing over Sunak pledge to end small boat crossings Tory row brewing over Sunak pledge to end small boat crossings
(about 3 hours later)
Tory MPs at odds with No 10 over commitment to end crossings, with PM’s office saying he set no deadlineTory MPs at odds with No 10 over commitment to end crossings, with PM’s office saying he set no deadline
A row is brewing within the Conservative party over Rishi Sunak’s promise to end small boat crossings in the Channel, as backbench MPs warn the prime minister not to wriggle out of a pledge he made earlier this year. The government has pledged to move asylum seekers into disused military bases with the minimum living conditions allowed under international law, but has come under pressure from ministers whose constituencies would host the camps.
Sunak announced in January he would bring an end to the small boat crossings, which have escalated rapidly over the past four years, with more than 45,000 people having made the crossing last year. Rebel Conservative backbenchers warned that they expected Rishi Sunak’s pledge to stop small boat crossings to be fulfilled by the end of the year, a timetable rejected by Downing Street and one that could potentially lead to an internal split.
But Tory MPs are at odds with Downing Street over when that pledge is due to be realised, with the row threatening to undermine talks between ministers and a group of rebel backbenchers who want the government to toughen up its illegal migration bill. Announcing the plan to stop housing asylum seekers in hotels while their claims are processed, Robert Jenrick, the immigration minister, said the UK could stop incentives to cross the Channel only by being as ruthless as the people smugglers.
A spokesperson for the rebels said: “We understood the speech [in January] was crystal clear that we are going to stop the boats by the end of the year. Stop the boats, halve inflation, grow the economy – these were all promises to be fulfilled by the end of the year.” “They are some of the most evil, most pernicious people in society. You have to match them – you cannot behave in a way that is weak and naive,” he told MPs.
Downing Street said on Wednesday this was not the case. The prime minister’s spokesperson said: “We haven’t set a deadline for it. We recognise that it’s a complex problem, and obviously some of the elements that we believe will solve it are subject to judicial challenge.” The asylum seeker camps would meet international legal requirements to ensure that those who arrived were not made destitute, Jenrick said, with shelter in “repurposed barrack blocks and Portakabins” and basic medical care, but nothing that could act as “a magnet” for displaced people.
The increase in small boat crossings has created a big headache for the government. Sunak dwelt on the issue at length in his January speech, but the ambiguity of his promise has caused problems for Downing Street since. “Accommodation for migrants should meet their essential living needs and nothing more,” Jenrick said. “We must not elevate the wellbeing of illegal migrants above those of the British people.”
The prime minister said at the time: “We will halve inflation, grow the economy, reduce debt, cut waiting lists and stop the boats. Those are the people’s priorities, they are your government’s priorities, and we will either have achieved them or not.” The plan, involving the use at least three former bases, prompted immediate condemnation from campaign groups, with the Refugee Council saying they were unworkable and “not who we are as a country”.
Since then ministers have unveiled a new immigration bill that would order the detention of anyone entering the UK across the Channel. On Wednesday, Robert Jenrick, the immigration minister, announced additional plans to house asylum seekers in army bases and potentially on barges and ferries. It also remains to be seen how effective the policy will be, with the planned accommodation on disused bases, totalling 4,900 spots, amounting to less than a tenth of the 51,000 people currently housed in hotels.
The government’s plans are under threat on two fronts: first, from critics who say they are illegal and have promised to challenge them in the courts and, second, from Conservative MPs who want them to be even tougher. Another complication is that two of the three planned bases are in the constituencies of government ministers, both of whom have expressed displeasure at the plans, while the third faces a legal challenge from the council, supported by the local Conservative MP.
One group of Tory rebels, led by the Devizes MP Danny Kruger, had intended to propose an amendment to the illegal migration bill when it was debated in the Commons this week, which would have banned judges from issuing last-minute injunctions to stop deportations. Under the plans, up to 1,700 people would be eventually housed at a disused defence site at Wethersfield in Essex; 2,000 more at a former RAF base at Scampton in Lincolnshire; and 1,200 at an RAF site turned prison in Bexhill, East Sussex.
James Cleverly has previously spoken out against the use of the Wethersfield site, in his Braintree constituency. In a statement on Wednesday the foreign secretary said he had been given assurances about local safety but said the decision “isn’t the result my constituents and I wanted”.
Huw Merriman, the rail minister, also expressed concern about the choice of the Northeye site at Bexhill, in his constituency, saying this would be “of great concern to local residents”.
Edward Leigh, the Tory MP whose Gainsborough constituency contains RAF Scampton, which was the base for the Dambusters bomber squadron in the second world war, said the council would seek an injunction to stop it being used.
In a separate internal row, Tory rebels who threatened earlier this week to push through amendments to the illegal migration bill, which pledges to deport and permanently bar from the UK anyone who arrives unofficially, reiterated their push for rapid action.A spokesperson for the rebels, who dropped their amendments after ministers assured them they would remove more legal safeguards for asylum seekers, said they understood Sunak’s pledge to stop small boats, in a speech in January setting out five policy pledges, to mean this would happen during 2023.
Sign up to First EditionSign up to First Edition
Archie Bland and Nimo Omer take you through the top stories and what they mean, free every weekday morningArchie Bland and Nimo Omer take you through the top stories and what they mean, free every weekday morning
after newsletter promotionafter newsletter promotion
They were persuaded to back down after ministers and Downing Street officials assured them their concerns would be reflected in later versions of the bill. The rebel MPs are due to hold talks with the government over the Easter recess, which begins on Thursday. “We understood the speech was crystal clear that we are going to stop the boats by the end of the year,” the spokesperson said. “Stop the boats, halve inflation, grow the economy – these were all promises to be fulfilled by the end of the year.”
However, those close to the talks say the positive atmosphere that ministers have generated so far risks being undermined by the row over the prime minister’s pledge and when it applies. However, Downing Street said on Wednesday this was not the case. The prime minister’s spokesperson said: “We haven’t set a deadline for it. We recognise that it’s a complex problem, and obviously some of the elements that we believe will solve it are subject to judicial challenge.”
Sunak dwelt on the issue at length in his January speech, but the ambiguity of his promise has caused problems for Downing Street since.
The prime minister said at the time: “We will halve inflation, grow the economy, reduce debt, cut waiting lists and stop the boats. Those are the people’s priorities, they are your government’s priorities, and we will either have achieved them or not.”The impasse threatens a renewal of hostilities with Tory rebels, reported to number up to 60, who were persuaded to back down after ministers and Downing Street officials assured them their concerns would be reflected in later versions of the migration bill.
The rebel MPs, led by the Devizes MP Danny Kruger, were due to hold talks with the government over the Easter recess, which begins on Thursday.
Even as it stands, the illegal migration bill has been roundly condemned by rights groups and refugee charities. On Wednesday, the Council of Europe’s group of experts on action against trafficking in human beings (Greta) took the highly unusual step of expressing concern about the bill and its lack of compliance with core elements of the council’s convention on action against trafficking in human beings.
The planned law, which would not usually allow asylum seekers to avoid deportation even if they were trafficked or slaves, is a “significant step backwards” in the fight against human trafficking and modern slavery, the group said.