This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/05/opinion/trump-arraignment-speech-maralago.html

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Trump, the Incredible Shrinking Defendant Trump, the Incredible Shrinking Defendant
(32 minutes later)
Donald Trump captured one thing correctly on Tuesday: It was “SURREAL.”Donald Trump captured one thing correctly on Tuesday: It was “SURREAL.”
His arraignment on felony charges was an anticlimactic spectacle, much of it conjured by ratings-starved television news, and the rest created by Trump himself.His arraignment on felony charges was an anticlimactic spectacle, much of it conjured by ratings-starved television news, and the rest created by Trump himself.
The wall-to-wall coverage of his movements — from motorcade to tarmac to a Manhattan courthouse and back again — complete with aerial shots and breathless narration, were supposed to underscore the day’s events as an “I remember where I was when” moment in American history. Over and over, this was described as a sad day for the country.The wall-to-wall coverage of his movements — from motorcade to tarmac to a Manhattan courthouse and back again — complete with aerial shots and breathless narration, were supposed to underscore the day’s events as an “I remember where I was when” moment in American history. Over and over, this was described as a sad day for the country.
It didn’t feel that way to me. It felt like the arrival of justice long delayed — like someone in the criminal justice system finally gathering courage and sidestepping all the thumb-sucking about the political implications of bringing charges.It didn’t feel that way to me. It felt like the arrival of justice long delayed — like someone in the criminal justice system finally gathering courage and sidestepping all the thumb-sucking about the political implications of bringing charges.
It was finally evidence of the justice system doing its best to operate as normal, to treat a former president as it would any other defendant, trying to firmly establish something resembling fairness and honesty ‌in this country.It was finally evidence of the justice system doing its best to operate as normal, to treat a former president as it would any other defendant, trying to firmly establish something resembling fairness and honesty ‌in this country.
At the time the indictment was unsealed, the consternation commenced about the validity and efficacy of the charges: Were they grave enough to charge a former president with? To what degree would they be seen as politically motivated? To what degree would they help Trump rather than hurt him as he embarks on another presidential campaign?At the time the indictment was unsealed, the consternation commenced about the validity and efficacy of the charges: Were they grave enough to charge a former president with? To what degree would they be seen as politically motivated? To what degree would they help Trump rather than hurt him as he embarks on another presidential campaign?
The chatter wasn’t so much about whether he had actually done what a grand jury and District Attorney Alvin Bragg charged him with, but whether the charges had the heft to merit the national moment and the strength to survive a vigorous defense.The chatter wasn’t so much about whether he had actually done what a grand jury and District Attorney Alvin Bragg charged him with, but whether the charges had the heft to merit the national moment and the strength to survive a vigorous defense.
Senator Mitt Romney said charging Trump in this case “fit a political agenda.” Senator Marco Rubio called it “poison” that crossed a line America might not come back from. But the reality is that Trump is the line-crosser — he’s the aberration from the norm and the stain on our politics from which the country must recover. Some Republicans are trying to straitjacket those seeking to hold Trump accountable when they argue that prosecutors are somehow breaking convention when they charge that Trump has broken the law.Senator Mitt Romney said charging Trump in this case “fit a political agenda.” Senator Marco Rubio called it “poison” that crossed a line America might not come back from. But the reality is that Trump is the line-crosser — he’s the aberration from the norm and the stain on our politics from which the country must recover. Some Republicans are trying to straitjacket those seeking to hold Trump accountable when they argue that prosecutors are somehow breaking convention when they charge that Trump has broken the law.
That, to me, is the saddest part.That, to me, is the saddest part.
But if the political is to be given the same weight as the legal and the moral, then we also need to consider how completely Trump fumbled that side of things. Instead of enlarging himself before American voters, he shrank himself, becoming a tiny, egocentric ax grinder.But if the political is to be given the same weight as the legal and the moral, then we also need to consider how completely Trump fumbled that side of things. Instead of enlarging himself before American voters, he shrank himself, becoming a tiny, egocentric ax grinder.
As the day ended Tuesday, Trump made his way back to Mar-a-Lago to address a throng of supporters, with much of the country watching on TV.As the day ended Tuesday, Trump made his way back to Mar-a-Lago to address a throng of supporters, with much of the country watching on TV.
A smart political use of that opportunity would have been to project an image of dignified defiance, of someone resolute amid a storm of persecution, of someone like any other citizen in a position where no one wants to be.A smart political use of that opportunity would have been to project an image of dignified defiance, of someone resolute amid a storm of persecution, of someone like any other citizen in a position where no one wants to be.
Instead, his speech was a boring recital of his long list of grievances, full of lies and replete with personal attacks directed at the prosecutors in various cases being brought against him.Instead, his speech was a boring recital of his long list of grievances, full of lies and replete with personal attacks directed at the prosecutors in various cases being brought against him.
Even those were predictable: Bragg, who brought the hush-money-related charges; District Attorney Fani Willis of Fulton County, Ga., who might charge Trump with interfering in her state’s 2020 election; and New York Attorney General Letitia James, who is suing the Trump Organization, are all Black. Even those were predictable: Bragg, who brought the hush-money-related charges; District Attorney Fani Willis of Fulton County, Ga., who might charge Trump with interfering in her state’s 2020 election; and Attorney General Letitia James of New York, who is suing the Trump Organization, are all Black.
Trump has labeled them as racists, and he repeated the claim in his Mar-a-Lago speech.Trump has labeled them as racists, and he repeated the claim in his Mar-a-Lago speech.
It’s not the first time he’s called Black people who challenge him racists, but he now seems to be leaning all the way into that smear, and it’s all of a piece: Last week on Truth Social (Trump’s poor man’s Twitter) he called me a “sick degenerate” — a reference, I assume, to the fact that I’m queer — claiming that I wrote that he should be prosecuted because he’s white.It’s not the first time he’s called Black people who challenge him racists, but he now seems to be leaning all the way into that smear, and it’s all of a piece: Last week on Truth Social (Trump’s poor man’s Twitter) he called me a “sick degenerate” — a reference, I assume, to the fact that I’m queer — claiming that I wrote that he should be prosecuted because he’s white.
I never wrote that, of course. It’s classic Trump projection: taking the thing for which he is guilty — racism in this instance — and accusing others of it. I never wrote that, of course. It’s classic Trump projection: taking the thing for which he is guilty — racism, in this instance — and accusing others of it.
Trump has nurtured in his base the idea of white victimization, and identifying purported Black racists further incubates that view.Trump has nurtured in his base the idea of white victimization, and identifying purported Black racists further incubates that view.
The whole exhibition reinforced just how stale Trump has become and how much of a one-trick pony he always was.The whole exhibition reinforced just how stale Trump has become and how much of a one-trick pony he always was.
You could say Trump’s indictment so strengthens him among his base that it might guarantee him the 2024 Republican nomination — and if so, that this could be the best-case scenario for Democrats.You could say Trump’s indictment so strengthens him among his base that it might guarantee him the 2024 Republican nomination — and if so, that this could be the best-case scenario for Democrats.
But he’s wounded and limping, regardless of how much his supporters gather to defend him. Trump isn’t what he used to be, and neither, it seems, is the country.But he’s wounded and limping, regardless of how much his supporters gather to defend him. Trump isn’t what he used to be, and neither, it seems, is the country.
The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here’s our email: letters@nytimes.com.The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here’s our email: letters@nytimes.com.
Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook and Twitter (@NYTopinion), and Instagram.Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook and Twitter (@NYTopinion), and Instagram.