This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/apr/06/rishi-sunak-says-no-further-action-against-mark-spencer-over-nusrat-ghani-sacking

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Rishi Sunak says no further action against Spencer over Ghani sacking Rishi Sunak says no further action against Spencer over Ghani sacking
(about 2 hours later)
Prime minister makes announcement after official inquiry criticises but clears minister of breaching rulesPrime minister makes announcement after official inquiry criticises but clears minister of breaching rules
Rishi Sunak has said he will take no further action against the minister Mark Spencer after an official investigation criticised the former chief whip but cleared him of breaching the rules over his sacking of Conservative colleague Nusrat Ghani. Allies of the Conservative MP Nus Ghani fear a “cover-up” of Islamophobia within the party after the former chief whip was cleared of rule-breaking over claims he said Ghani’s “Muslimness” played a role in her sacking.
Ghani, the MP for East Sussex who was sacked as a transport minister during the February 2020 reshuffle, claimed Spencer, then chief whip, linked her dismissal to her “Muslimness” that was “making colleagues uncomfortable”. She said she was warned her career would be “destroyed” if she tried to complain. Rishi Sunak on Thursday said he will take no further action against Mark Spencer, the former chief whip and now an environment minister.
An inquiry concluded by the prime minister’s ethics adviser, Sir Laurie Magnus, noted Spencer’s “shortcomings” but cleared him of breaching the ministerial code, citing an “absence of clear evidence”. An inquiry by the prime minister’s ethics adviser, Sir Laurie Magnus, noted Spencer’s “shortcomings” in his actions as chief whip but did not find him guilty of breaching the ministerial code because of “inconclusive evidence” on whether the alleged remarks were made.
The investigation was launched last January after Ghani spoke out about her ordeal, which she likened to “being punched in the stomach – I felt humiliated and powerless”. Speaking to the Sunday Times, she said her loyalty was questioned because she “didn’t do enough to defend the party against Islamophobia allegations”. Magnus said both Ghani and Spencer had been adamant and consistent in their conviction about what was said, but gave differing accounts. He found no evidence that Ghani’s faith had come up during reshuffle discussions.
Magnus was tasked with concluding an investigation that was launched last January after Ghani, the MP for East Sussex, claimed Spencer linked her sacking as transport minister to her faith and allegedly said it was “making colleagues uncomfortable”.
She said she was warned her career would be “destroyed” if she tried to complain following a meeting with Spencer during a cabinet reshuffle in 2020, when Boris Johnson was prime minister.
Ghani likened the ordeal to being “punched in the stomach” when she revealed it to the Sunday Times last year. She said her loyalty was also questioned because she “didn’t do enough to defend the party against Islamophobia allegations”.
Following the publication of Magnus’s report, an ally of Ghani’s stressed he had conducted the investigation to the best of his ability but criticised what they called a “protection racket” around Johnson and his former top team.
“There are people who know the truth and may have changed what they said they heard subsequently,” the ally said.
They doubted Spencer’s alleged comments were his own, and believe that instead he had with “pig-headedness” repeated what he had heard from figures in No 10 to Ghani. “I believe her,” the ally said. “I think she is telling the truth.”
Another ally criticised the Conservatives for failing to tackle the “stench of Islamophobia within the party”. They said the Tories have a track record of brushing allegations linked to Islamophobia under the carpet.
A senior Conservative source said they feared the handling of Ghani’s allegations “sends out a terrible message” on how the party challenges Islamophobia. They accused Sunak of enabling a “revolving door of racism” within the party, as little had changed since Johnson left government last year.
Sayeeda Warsi, the former Conservative party chair who is now a Tory peer, said Ghani had been “treated appallingly for the last two years”, and that without the media, her case would not have been dealt with.
She said: “We have people within our party who have dubious racist views, and communicate with dubious racist language. The test of leadership is when the party and prime minister ensures people holding these views do not hold high office and do not influence policy making in government.”
Magnus concluded in his report: “Both Ms Ghani and Mr Spencer consider each other to be mistaken in their recollections and both remain aggrieved and personally affected by the impact of this public disagreement. I would hope that, as dedicated public servants and ministers of the crown, they will now find a way to move on from these events.”Magnus concluded in his report: “Both Ms Ghani and Mr Spencer consider each other to be mistaken in their recollections and both remain aggrieved and personally affected by the impact of this public disagreement. I would hope that, as dedicated public servants and ministers of the crown, they will now find a way to move on from these events.”
The prime minister wrote to Magnus noting that the events surrounding the sacking had been an “unsatisfactory experience for both ministers involved”. He added: “But in the absence of clear evidence, it would not be right to take further action. I have spoken to both ministers and encouraged them to heed your advice to pull together in the finest tradition of public service.” The prime minister wrote to Magnus saying the events surrounding the sacking had been an “unsatisfactory experience for both ministers involved”. He added: “But in the absence of clear evidence, it would not be right to take further action. I have spoken to both ministers and encouraged them to heed your advice to pull together in the finest tradition of public service.”
Responding to the findings, Ghani urged Spencer to explain his “shortcomings” and other failings. “There is no criticism or doubt expressed regarding my version of events,” she said. “We all serve at the prime minister’s choosing and there is no shame in a political career ending. But to be told your faith and identity is the reason for it cannot be acceptable in any way. Responding to the findings, Ghani, who is now a business minister, urged Spencer to explain his “shortcomings” and other failings. “There is no criticism or doubt expressed regarding my version of events,” she said. “We all serve at the prime minister’s choosing and there is no shame in a political career ending. But to be told your faith and identity is the reason for it cannot be acceptable in any way.
“The impact of being told this was devastating and my motivation in pursuing the complaint was to ensure it wasn’t buried, but that it ended with me so that no other colleague would have to endure anything similar.”“The impact of being told this was devastating and my motivation in pursuing the complaint was to ensure it wasn’t buried, but that it ended with me so that no other colleague would have to endure anything similar.”
Magnus said he was unable to “draw a clear picture” of the discussions between the pair in 2020 as there was not an independent witness who was present for the “exit interview”.Magnus said he was unable to “draw a clear picture” of the discussions between the pair in 2020 as there was not an independent witness who was present for the “exit interview”.
Angela Rayner, Labour’s deputy leader, said the report was “damning” for a Conservative party which had yet to adopt a formal definition of Islamophobia.She said: “It’s taken three years for a broken system to reach this unsatisfactory conclusion. After all the denials, Mark Spencer was found to have misled the former prime minister and the public but still considered fit to be a minister by Rishi Sunak.”