This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/apr/17/media-frenzy-directed-at-brittany-higgins-carried-risk-to-her-life-said-bruce-lehrmann-trial-judge
The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 1 | Version 2 |
|---|---|
| ‘Media frenzy’ directed at Brittany Higgins carried ‘risk to her life’, said Bruce Lehrmann trial judge | ‘Media frenzy’ directed at Brittany Higgins carried ‘risk to her life’, said Bruce Lehrmann trial judge |
| (about 1 hour later) | |
| ACT chief justice publishes reasons for maintaining suppression orders in a newly released judgment | ACT chief justice publishes reasons for maintaining suppression orders in a newly released judgment |
| The judge who oversaw the trial of Bruce Lehrmann feared that the media frenzy directed at Brittany Higgins carried “a risk to her life”, a newly released judgment shows. | |
| On Monday, the ACT supreme court chief justice Lucy McCallum published her reasons for maintaining a number of suppression orders over aspects of the case, which were challenged by media outlets following the conclusion of criminal proceedings. | |
| One of those suppression orders concerned an application made by Lehrmann on 22 November, a month after the trial collapsed due to juror misconduct but before prosecutors announced their decision not to pursue a retrial. | One of those suppression orders concerned an application made by Lehrmann on 22 November, a month after the trial collapsed due to juror misconduct but before prosecutors announced their decision not to pursue a retrial. |
| The nature of Lehrmann’s application still cannot be published. When he first made it in November, McCallum said she needed to prohibit any reporting of it to safeguard the then planned retrial from any prejudice. | The nature of Lehrmann’s application still cannot be published. When he first made it in November, McCallum said she needed to prohibit any reporting of it to safeguard the then planned retrial from any prejudice. |
| Sign up for Guardian Australia’s free morning and afternoon email newsletters for your daily news roundup | Sign up for Guardian Australia’s free morning and afternoon email newsletters for your daily news roundup |
| Sign up for Guardian Australia’s free morning and afternoon email newsletters for your daily news roundup | Sign up for Guardian Australia’s free morning and afternoon email newsletters for your daily news roundup |
| When the retrial was dropped in early December, media outlets asked her to revisit the suppression, but the chief justice decided to maintain the restrictions, saying she did not wish to add to the “media frenzy” surrounding the case. | When the retrial was dropped in early December, media outlets asked her to revisit the suppression, but the chief justice decided to maintain the restrictions, saying she did not wish to add to the “media frenzy” surrounding the case. |
| She said further reporting posed a real risk to Higgins’ welfare. | She said further reporting posed a real risk to Higgins’ welfare. |
| “Based on my experience of the trial, which included the provision of a medical certificate when the complainant became unavailable to continue her evidence, my own observations of the complainant and the information provided to me by the [director of public prosecutions] yesterday concerning her current medical condition, I have no doubt that any further exacerbation of the level of media attention directed to her carries a risk to her life,” McCallum ruled. | “Based on my experience of the trial, which included the provision of a medical certificate when the complainant became unavailable to continue her evidence, my own observations of the complainant and the information provided to me by the [director of public prosecutions] yesterday concerning her current medical condition, I have no doubt that any further exacerbation of the level of media attention directed to her carries a risk to her life,” McCallum ruled. |
| “My view on that issue is not altered by the fact that she herself has made press statements. I do not think that indicates that one can compartmentalise the areas in which she is vulnerable and the areas in which she is not.” | “My view on that issue is not altered by the fact that she herself has made press statements. I do not think that indicates that one can compartmentalise the areas in which she is vulnerable and the areas in which she is not.” |
| “I am simply not prepared to contribute to the media frenzy that has been this case.” | “I am simply not prepared to contribute to the media frenzy that has been this case.” |
| She said that allowing the media access to material linked to Lehrmann’s application would give the media a “new story or a new slant”. | She said that allowing the media access to material linked to Lehrmann’s application would give the media a “new story or a new slant”. |
| “Based on my assessment of the application and the affidavit, it is my firm view that publication of that material would give the media a new story or a new slant that would inevitably result in further harm to the complainant, and that is not a step I am prepared to take,” McCallum ruled. | “Based on my assessment of the application and the affidavit, it is my firm view that publication of that material would give the media a new story or a new slant that would inevitably result in further harm to the complainant, and that is not a step I am prepared to take,” McCallum ruled. |
| Sign up to Guardian Australia's Morning Mail | Sign up to Guardian Australia's Morning Mail |
| Our Australian morning briefing email breaks down the key national and international stories of the day and why they matter | Our Australian morning briefing email breaks down the key national and international stories of the day and why they matter |
| after newsletter promotion | after newsletter promotion |
| McCallum also maintained a suppression over the reasons Lehrmann’s counsel was unavailable in May, prompting a short delay to the trial, and over the contents of certain documents linked to the trial. She lifted a suppression on reporting of the reasons Higgins was absent for some days during the trial. | McCallum also maintained a suppression over the reasons Lehrmann’s counsel was unavailable in May, prompting a short delay to the trial, and over the contents of certain documents linked to the trial. She lifted a suppression on reporting of the reasons Higgins was absent for some days during the trial. |
| McCallum’s reasons for maintaining the suppression orders, given on 2 December, had themselves not been published until Monday. | McCallum’s reasons for maintaining the suppression orders, given on 2 December, had themselves not been published until Monday. |
| They were published after an application to vary the orders slightly, which prompted a brief hearing in the ACT supreme court on Monday afternoon. McCallum then decided she could publish a redacted form of her earlier reasons. | They were published after an application to vary the orders slightly, which prompted a brief hearing in the ACT supreme court on Monday afternoon. McCallum then decided she could publish a redacted form of her earlier reasons. |
| Lehrmann pleaded not guilty to one charge of sexual intercourse without consent and has maintained his innocence. | Lehrmann pleaded not guilty to one charge of sexual intercourse without consent and has maintained his innocence. |
| In Australia, support is available at Beyond Blue on 1300 22 4636, Lifeline on 13 11 14, and at MensLine on 1300 789 978. In the UK, the charity Mind is available on 0300 123 3393 and ChildLine on 0800 1111. In the US, Mental Health America is available on 800-273-8255 | In Australia, support is available at Beyond Blue on 1300 22 4636, Lifeline on 13 11 14, and at MensLine on 1300 789 978. In the UK, the charity Mind is available on 0300 123 3393 and ChildLine on 0800 1111. In the US, Mental Health America is available on 800-273-8255 |
| In Australia, support is available at Beyond Blue on 1300 22 4636, Lifeline on 13 11 14, and at MensLine on 1300 789 978. In the UK, the charity Mind is available on 0300 123 3393 and ChildLine on 0800 1111. In the US, Mental Health America is available on 800-273-8255 | In Australia, support is available at Beyond Blue on 1300 22 4636, Lifeline on 13 11 14, and at MensLine on 1300 789 978. In the UK, the charity Mind is available on 0300 123 3393 and ChildLine on 0800 1111. In the US, Mental Health America is available on 800-273-8255 |