This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/01/us/politics/debt-limit-senate.html

The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
G.O.P. Demands for More Pentagon Money Slow Debt Limit Bill in Senate Senate Presses Toward Passing Debt Limit Bill, Resolving Pentagon Spending Dispute
(about 2 hours later)
The bipartisan bill to suspend the federal debt limit and impose spending caps encountered a new set of obstacles in the Senate on Thursday as a group of Republican defense hawks raised objections to Pentagon funding levels they said were too low, threatening to delay passage of a plan that must be enacted by Monday to avoid a government default. The Senate was on track on Thursday night to pass bipartisan legislation suspending the debt limit and imposing new spending caps and send it to President Biden, racing to avoid a default.
Despite warnings from leaders of both parties that the Senate needed to act swiftly, a handful of Republicans took to the floor to assail the military spending in the measure negotiated between Speaker Kevin McCarthy and President Biden and demand that their concerns be addressed before it could be passed. After an afternoon of closed-door talks to resolve a last-minute dispute over Pentagon funding, Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York and the majority leader, said the chamber would begin voting on proposed changes to the package — all of which were expected to fail — and pass it later Thursday night, days before the Treasury Department is set to run out of cash to pay its bills.
“To my House colleagues, I can’t believe you did this,” said Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, accusing the architects of the measure of undercutting the military at a time of rising threats from Russia and China. “This budget is a win for China.” “America can breathe a sigh of relief because we are avoiding default,” Mr. Schumer said.
The concerns threw the timetable for Senate action into flux, with some lawmakers saying a vote could come Thursday evening but officials cautioning approval might not come until Friday at the earliest. The announcement came after a day of uncertainty as a handful of Republicans complained that the deal — negotiated between Mr. Biden and Speaker Kevin McCarthy without input from the Senate — would under-fund the military, and demanded a commitment that their concerns would be addressed before it could be passed.
The agreement, which was approved overwhelmingly by the House on Wednesday night, would increase Pentagon spending to $886 billion for next year, a 3 percent raise, when many domestic programs were targeted for cuts in the plan. But G.O.P. backers of higher spending for the military argued the package fell far short of what was needed. By evening, Senate officials and Senator Lindsey Graham, the South Carolina Republican who had been a chief critic of the Pentagon spending levels, said leaders in both parties had negotiated language that reassured him and other defense hawks sufficiently to back the bill, clearing the way for final votes.
“I just have to say that the fact that this is being called a victory by some people on our side of the aisle is absolutely inaccurate,” said Senator Roger Wicker, Republican of Mississippi, who called the funding level “woefully inadequate.” “It does not fix this bill totally, but it is a march in the right direction,” said Mr. Graham.
Mr. Graham and others said that at a minimum, they wanted a commitment that Congress would later move on a supplemental funding bill to beef up the spending, although this would in effect reduce the savings Republicans had hoped to achieve through their debt limit leverage. The debt-limit agreement, which was approved overwhelmingly by the House on Wednesday night, would suspend the $31.4 trillion debt ceiling until January 2025 while cutting spending on domestic programs.
It would increase Pentagon spending to $886 billion for next year, a 3 percent raise, but G.O.P. backers of higher spending for the military noted that that would not keep pace with inflation, and argued that the package fell far short of what was needed.
“To my House colleagues, I can’t believe you did this,” Mr. Graham said earlier in the day, accusing the architects of the measure of undercutting the military at a time of rising threats from Russia and China. “This budget is a win for China.”
Mr. Graham and others insisted said that at a minimum, they wanted a commitment that Congress would later move on an additional funding bill to beef up the spending, although this would in effect reduce the savings Republicans had hoped to achieve through their debt limit deal.
“We know that this budget is not adequate to the global threats that we face,” said Senator Susan Collins of Maine, the senior Republican on the full Appropriations Committee. “An emergency supplemental must be coming our way.”“We know that this budget is not adequate to the global threats that we face,” said Senator Susan Collins of Maine, the senior Republican on the full Appropriations Committee. “An emergency supplemental must be coming our way.”
The opposition erupted almost immediately after Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York and the majority leader, warned that the Senate needed to move quickly and make no changes to the agreement to clear it for Mr. Biden’s signature by Monday. He admonished lawmakers not to engage in brinkmanship before the so-called X-date of June 5, when Treasury Secretary Janet L. Yellen has said the government will run out of cash to pay its bills. The opposition erupted almost immediately after Mr. Schumer opened the Senate on Thursday morning by warning that the chamber needed to move quickly and make no changes to the agreement to clear it for Mr. Biden’s signature by Monday. He admonished lawmakers not to engage in brinkmanship before the so-called X-date of June 5, when Treasury Secretary Janet L. Yellen has said the government will default without action by Congress.
“Time is a luxury the Senate does not have if we want to prevent default,” Mr. Schumer said. “June 5 is less than four days away. At this point, any needless delay or any last-minute holdups would be an unnecessary and even dangerous risk.”“Time is a luxury the Senate does not have if we want to prevent default,” Mr. Schumer said. “June 5 is less than four days away. At this point, any needless delay or any last-minute holdups would be an unnecessary and even dangerous risk.”
Even as the deal migrated across the Capitol, the effects of the debt limit continued to pinch. The Treasury announced on Thursday that it would delay auctions of three-month and six-month “bills” — short-term debt that the government no longer has room to take on until the borrowing cap is suspended.Even as the deal migrated across the Capitol, the effects of the debt limit continued to pinch. The Treasury announced on Thursday that it would delay auctions of three-month and six-month “bills” — short-term debt that the government no longer has room to take on until the borrowing cap is suspended.
Multiple senators have said they want to propose amendments to the bill, which would suspend the $31.4 trillion debt ceiling until January 2025 while cutting spending on domestic programs. They have the ability to slow the measure procedurally if they are denied the opportunity. As part of the deal to move forward with final votes on the bill, multiple senators secured votes on proposed changes. Mr. Schumer was determined to defeat all of them, as any alteration would force the measure back to the House, where no action would be likely to occur before the default deadline.
Senators were negotiating which amendments would be allowed on the floor, but Mr. Schumer was determined to defeat them. Any changes would force the measure back to the House, where no action would be likely to occur before the default deadline.
“Any change to this bill that forces us to send it back to the House would be entirely unacceptable,” he said. “It would almost guarantee default.”“Any change to this bill that forces us to send it back to the House would be entirely unacceptable,” he said. “It would almost guarantee default.”
Among those seeking votes is Senator Tim Kaine, Democrat of Virginia, who on Thursday called for stripping a provision from the legislation that would expedite the approval of an oil pipeline in West Virginia. Among those securing a vote was Senator Tim Kaine, Democrat of Virginia, who on Thursday called for stripping a provision from the legislation that would expedite the approval of an oil pipeline in West Virginia.
“I support improving the permitting process for all energy projects,” Mr. Kaine said. “But Congress putting its thumb on the scale so that one specific project doesn’t have to comply with the same process as everyone else is the definition of unfair and opens the door to corruption.”“I support improving the permitting process for all energy projects,” Mr. Kaine said. “But Congress putting its thumb on the scale so that one specific project doesn’t have to comply with the same process as everyone else is the definition of unfair and opens the door to corruption.”
After driving much of the legislative agenda the previous two years, the Senate left negotiating on the debt limit to Mr. Biden and Mr. McCarthy, whose demand for spending cuts and other policy changes brought the country to the brink of default. Nearly all Republican senators signed a letter backing Mr. McCarthy in the effort. As a result, senators had little influence over the negotiations and are now being forced to approve legislation they did not help shape. It is leaving some frustrated.After driving much of the legislative agenda the previous two years, the Senate left negotiating on the debt limit to Mr. Biden and Mr. McCarthy, whose demand for spending cuts and other policy changes brought the country to the brink of default. Nearly all Republican senators signed a letter backing Mr. McCarthy in the effort. As a result, senators had little influence over the negotiations and are now being forced to approve legislation they did not help shape. It is leaving some frustrated.
Senator John Cornyn, Republican of Texas, praised Mr. McCarthy’s efforts but said senators had no obligation to simply rubber stamp the deal and deserved opportunities to change it.Senator John Cornyn, Republican of Texas, praised Mr. McCarthy’s efforts but said senators had no obligation to simply rubber stamp the deal and deserved opportunities to change it.
“We weren’t a party to the agreement,” he said. “Why should we be bound by the strict terms of that agreement? The Senate has not had a say in the process so far.”“We weren’t a party to the agreement,” he said. “Why should we be bound by the strict terms of that agreement? The Senate has not had a say in the process so far.”
But Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the minority leader, urged his fellow Republicans to back the plan.But Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the minority leader, urged his fellow Republicans to back the plan.
“Last night, an overwhelming majority of our House colleagues voted to pass the agreement Speaker McCarthy reached with President Biden,” he said. “In doing so, they took an urgent and important step in the right direction for the health of our economy and the future of our country.”“Last night, an overwhelming majority of our House colleagues voted to pass the agreement Speaker McCarthy reached with President Biden,” he said. “In doing so, they took an urgent and important step in the right direction for the health of our economy and the future of our country.”
Joe Rennison contributed reporting from New York.Joe Rennison contributed reporting from New York.