This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/jun/02/suella-braverman-urged-clarify-refugees-left-london-street

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Suella Braverman urged to clarify why refugees were left on London street Suella Braverman urged to clarify why refugees were left on London street
(32 minutes later)
Westminster council leader says about 40 asylum seekers were placed in borough ‘without appropriate accommodation’Westminster council leader says about 40 asylum seekers were placed in borough ‘without appropriate accommodation’
The home secretary, Suella Braverman, has been asked to urgently clarify why a large group of asylum seekers were left on the street in Westminster for two nights running.The home secretary, Suella Braverman, has been asked to urgently clarify why a large group of asylum seekers were left on the street in Westminster for two nights running.
In a letter to Braverman, the leader of Westminster city council expressed his deep concern that about 40 refugees were placed in the borough on Wednesday night “without appropriate accommodation or support available” and no prior communication with the local authority. In a letter to Braverman, the leader of Westminster city council expressed his deep concern that about 40 refugees had been placed in the borough on Wednesday night “without appropriate accommodation or support available” and no prior communication with the local authority.
The group apparently refused to enter a Pimlico hotel where the Home Office had asked them to sleep “four people per room”.The group apparently refused to enter a Pimlico hotel where the Home Office had asked them to sleep “four people per room”.
On Friday morning, about 20 people remained outside the Comfort Inn in protest at the cramped conditions inside, according to the council, with pictures showing suitcases and blankets strewn across the pavement.On Friday morning, about 20 people remained outside the Comfort Inn in protest at the cramped conditions inside, according to the council, with pictures showing suitcases and blankets strewn across the pavement.
The leader of the council, Adam Hug, said asking people who “are likely to have been through significant and traumatic events” to share “an inappropriately sized room with multiple strangers defies common sense and basic decency”.The leader of the council, Adam Hug, said asking people who “are likely to have been through significant and traumatic events” to share “an inappropriately sized room with multiple strangers defies common sense and basic decency”.
He said the government’s demand created “safeguarding and health risks”, and noted that “leaving them on the street for multiple nights is not an alternative”.He said the government’s demand created “safeguarding and health risks”, and noted that “leaving them on the street for multiple nights is not an alternative”.
In his letter to Braverman on Thursday, he wrote: “Neither the Home Office nor the hotel itself responded to this incident, ultimately leaving it to council officers to manage and support this large group overnight. I would ask that you urgently clarify how this was allowed to happen, why this was acceptable, and why no communication was made with the local authority to alert us.In his letter to Braverman on Thursday, he wrote: “Neither the Home Office nor the hotel itself responded to this incident, ultimately leaving it to council officers to manage and support this large group overnight. I would ask that you urgently clarify how this was allowed to happen, why this was acceptable, and why no communication was made with the local authority to alert us.
“I note that the issue is still unresolved and, as of Thursday evening, all 40 asylum seekers remain on the street. This is not acceptable.“I note that the issue is still unresolved and, as of Thursday evening, all 40 asylum seekers remain on the street. This is not acceptable.
“It is not right, nor is it in the interest of these individuals – or our residents – to have them forced to endure a night on the streets because their transition into new accommodation has not been properly managed.”“It is not right, nor is it in the interest of these individuals – or our residents – to have them forced to endure a night on the streets because their transition into new accommodation has not been properly managed.”
Rough sleeping teams have been supporting the refugees, according to the council, which claimed the Home Office had not put forward any resolution to the matter.Rough sleeping teams have been supporting the refugees, according to the council, which claimed the Home Office had not put forward any resolution to the matter.
A Home Office spokesperson said: “Despite the number of people arriving in the UK reaching record levels, we continue to provide accommodation – at a cost of £6m a day – for asylum seekers who would otherwise be destitute, to meet our legal obligation.A Home Office spokesperson said: “Despite the number of people arriving in the UK reaching record levels, we continue to provide accommodation – at a cost of £6m a day – for asylum seekers who would otherwise be destitute, to meet our legal obligation.
“The accommodation offered to asylum seekers by providers, on a no-choice basis, is of a decent standard and meets all legal and contractual requirements.”“The accommodation offered to asylum seekers by providers, on a no-choice basis, is of a decent standard and meets all legal and contractual requirements.”