This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/jun/05/matt-hancock-tried-to-lobby-official-during-steve-brine-inquiry-report-finds
The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| Matt Hancock ordered to apologise to MPs for breach of lobbying rules | |
| (32 minutes later) | |
| Former health secretary given rap on knuckles for ‘lack of attention’ to MPs’ code of conduct | |
| Matt Hancock has been ordered to apologise by parliament’s sleaze watchdog after it found he broke House of Commons rules by trying to lobby an official investigating another Conservative MP for lobbying. | Matt Hancock has been ordered to apologise by parliament’s sleaze watchdog after it found he broke House of Commons rules by trying to lobby an official investigating another Conservative MP for lobbying. |
| The former health secretary, who sits as an independent, having been stripped of the Tory whip, was found to have committed only a “mild” breach of the rules. | The former health secretary, who sits as an independent, having been stripped of the Tory whip, was found to have committed only a “mild” breach of the rules. |
| However, Hancock was given a rap on the knuckles for a “lack of attention” to the MPs’ code of conduct. An update endorsed by MPs in December 2022 makes “lobbying the commissioner in a manner calculated or intended to influence his consideration” a specific offence. | However, Hancock was given a rap on the knuckles for a “lack of attention” to the MPs’ code of conduct. An update endorsed by MPs in December 2022 makes “lobbying the commissioner in a manner calculated or intended to influence his consideration” a specific offence. |
| Hancock had written to Daniel Greenberg, the Commons standards commissioner, about an ongoing inquiry into the former health minister Steve Brine. The intervention was unsolicited, and came after messages between Brine and the cabinet minister Michael Gove were published as part of the leaked cache of WhatsApps. | Hancock had written to Daniel Greenberg, the Commons standards commissioner, about an ongoing inquiry into the former health minister Steve Brine. The intervention was unsolicited, and came after messages between Brine and the cabinet minister Michael Gove were published as part of the leaked cache of WhatsApps. |
| The messages revealed that Brine had been trying “for months” to “help the NHS” by connecting it with a company called Remedium. It is a recruitment firm offering doctors for free to the health service, for which he was a paid strategic adviser. | The messages revealed that Brine had been trying “for months” to “help the NHS” by connecting it with a company called Remedium. It is a recruitment firm offering doctors for free to the health service, for which he was a paid strategic adviser. |
| Hancock’s actions on 28 March “sought to influence” Greenberg’s inquiry into Brine, the commissioner said. He did not ask the commissioner in advance if the letter would be helpful or check if the terms of reference into the Brine investigation meant it would assist. | Hancock’s actions on 28 March “sought to influence” Greenberg’s inquiry into Brine, the commissioner said. He did not ask the commissioner in advance if the letter would be helpful or check if the terms of reference into the Brine investigation meant it would assist. |
| “The lobbying in his letter was likely due to inattention and carelessness rather than a deliberate attempt to subvert the commissioner’s inquiry into Mr Brine,” a new report on Hancock’s behaviour said. | “The lobbying in his letter was likely due to inattention and carelessness rather than a deliberate attempt to subvert the commissioner’s inquiry into Mr Brine,” a new report on Hancock’s behaviour said. |
| Hancock may have broken another rule, the commissioner said, after his spokesperson issued a public statement about the matter – in direct contravention of a ban on MPs commenting on live investigations. Greenberg said it did not hinder the inquiry, so decided against imposing any sanction, but added that it underlined a “further lack of attention” to the rules. | Hancock may have broken another rule, the commissioner said, after his spokesperson issued a public statement about the matter – in direct contravention of a ban on MPs commenting on live investigations. Greenberg said it did not hinder the inquiry, so decided against imposing any sanction, but added that it underlined a “further lack of attention” to the rules. |
| Hancock maintains his innocence. In a letter to the standards committee, which is made up of MPs and lay-members and scrutinises decisions by the commissioner, Hancock said: “While I do not agree that the letter I write [sic] was a breach of these new rules, I do accept that the Commission [sic] has found any breach to be minor and inadvertent”. | Hancock maintains his innocence. In a letter to the standards committee, which is made up of MPs and lay-members and scrutinises decisions by the commissioner, Hancock said: “While I do not agree that the letter I write [sic] was a breach of these new rules, I do accept that the Commission [sic] has found any breach to be minor and inadvertent”. |
| Hancock’s experience was viewed as an aggravating factor, given he has been an MP for 13 years. The committee said it was “concerning that a member with this experience has not taken account of these provisions of the code”. | Hancock’s experience was viewed as an aggravating factor, given he has been an MP for 13 years. The committee said it was “concerning that a member with this experience has not taken account of these provisions of the code”. |
| He will be forced to make personal apology in the Commons, and has been given leniency because the committee said he did not mean to break the rules, and had no prospect of personal gain through writing the letter. Hancock will also be required to attend a briefing on his obligations under the rules. | He will be forced to make personal apology in the Commons, and has been given leniency because the committee said he did not mean to break the rules, and had no prospect of personal gain through writing the letter. Hancock will also be required to attend a briefing on his obligations under the rules. |
| Brine was found by Greenberg last month to have not properly declared his second job for Remedium Partners, but cleared of paid advocacy because his efforts were not seeking “financial or material benefit” for Remedium because the doctors’ services were offered pro bono. | Brine was found by Greenberg last month to have not properly declared his second job for Remedium Partners, but cleared of paid advocacy because his efforts were not seeking “financial or material benefit” for Remedium because the doctors’ services were offered pro bono. |