This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-65813912

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Ben Roberts-Smith threatened witnesses in defamation trial, judge says Ben Roberts-Smith threatened witnesses in defamation trial, judge says
(about 7 hours later)
Australia's most decorated living soldier has found his reputation tainted by allegation of war crimes.Australia's most decorated living soldier has found his reputation tainted by allegation of war crimes.
A judgement in a landmark defamation trial says Australia's most decorated living soldier lied to cover up his misdeeds and threatened witnesses.A judgement in a landmark defamation trial says Australia's most decorated living soldier lied to cover up his misdeeds and threatened witnesses.
It also found Ben Roberts-Smith "complicit in and responsible for" the murder of three Afghans. It also found Ben Roberts-Smith "complicit in and responsible for" the murder of four Afghans.
Last week, he lost a defamation suit against three Australian newspapers over war crimes allegations.Last week, he lost a defamation suit against three Australian newspapers over war crimes allegations.
It's raised the spectre of a possible wider reckoning over claims of war crimes by Australian forces.It's raised the spectre of a possible wider reckoning over claims of war crimes by Australian forces.
On Thursday, Federal Court Judge Anthony Besanko threw out the former special forces corporal's case against The Age, The Sydney Morning Herald, and The Canberra Times.On Thursday, Federal Court Judge Anthony Besanko threw out the former special forces corporal's case against The Age, The Sydney Morning Herald, and The Canberra Times.
Roberts-Smith claimed the papers ruined his life by their reports that he had broken the moral and legal rules of war.Roberts-Smith claimed the papers ruined his life by their reports that he had broken the moral and legal rules of war.
The judge delayed releasing the reasons for his judgement until Monday, to allow Australian authorities time to ensure it did not inadvertently divulge national security secrets.The judge delayed releasing the reasons for his judgement until Monday, to allow Australian authorities time to ensure it did not inadvertently divulge national security secrets.
But Judge Besanko found the claims that Roberts-Smith had murdered unarmed prisoners and civilians while serving in Afghanistan were "substantially true".But Judge Besanko found the claims that Roberts-Smith had murdered unarmed prisoners and civilians while serving in Afghanistan were "substantially true".
Saying that the 44-year-old was "not an honest and reliable witness", he added: "I have difficulty accepting the applicant's evidence on any disputed issue".Saying that the 44-year-old was "not an honest and reliable witness", he added: "I have difficulty accepting the applicant's evidence on any disputed issue".
He further found that the Victoria Cross recipient invoked a special forces code of silence to intimidate witnesses, and also smeared and threatened others.He further found that the Victoria Cross recipient invoked a special forces code of silence to intimidate witnesses, and also smeared and threatened others.
In a bid to silence a fellow Afghanistan veteran, Roberts-Smith went to the extent of sending a legal threat to Gina Rinehart, Australia's richest woman, warning that the ex-soldier - Ms Rinehart's relative - would be sued for speaking ill of him.In a bid to silence a fellow Afghanistan veteran, Roberts-Smith went to the extent of sending a legal threat to Gina Rinehart, Australia's richest woman, warning that the ex-soldier - Ms Rinehart's relative - would be sued for speaking ill of him.
He even hired a private detective to investigate another former soldier who was questioning his past, producing a report that profiled not only the veteran, but his wife and parents as well.He even hired a private detective to investigate another former soldier who was questioning his past, producing a report that profiled not only the veteran, but his wife and parents as well.
In a tape recording, Roberts-Smith was also heard lambasting soldiers who break the code of silence. "A few people [in the special forces] had done what we don't do and that's talk out of school."In a tape recording, Roberts-Smith was also heard lambasting soldiers who break the code of silence. "A few people [in the special forces] had done what we don't do and that's talk out of school."
Roberts-Smith has not commented since the ruling, but he is expected to appeal to the full bench of the federal court.Roberts-Smith has not commented since the ruling, but he is expected to appeal to the full bench of the federal court.
The 110-day defamation trial cost up to an estimated A$25m ($16.3m, £13.2m).The 110-day defamation trial cost up to an estimated A$25m ($16.3m, £13.2m).
Roberts-Smith had been considered a national hero for having single-handedly overpowered Taliban machine-gunners who were attacking his Special Air Service (SAS) platoon, earning him Australia's highest military honour.Roberts-Smith had been considered a national hero for having single-handedly overpowered Taliban machine-gunners who were attacking his Special Air Service (SAS) platoon, earning him Australia's highest military honour.
He was appointed to high-profile executive positions and received a string of accolades, even being crowned Father of the Year in 2013.He was appointed to high-profile executive positions and received a string of accolades, even being crowned Father of the Year in 2013.
But while he has not been charged with any offences, the father of two is currently the subject of an Australia Federal Police inquiry into alleged war crimes committed in Afghanistan.But while he has not been charged with any offences, the father of two is currently the subject of an Australia Federal Police inquiry into alleged war crimes committed in Afghanistan.
In 2020, a landmark investigation known as the Brereton Report found "credible evidence" that elite Australian soldiers unlawfully killed 39 people in Afghanistan.In 2020, a landmark investigation known as the Brereton Report found "credible evidence" that elite Australian soldiers unlawfully killed 39 people in Afghanistan.
It recommended that 19 current or former soldiers should be investigated over alleged killings of prisoners and civilians from 2009-13.It recommended that 19 current or former soldiers should be investigated over alleged killings of prisoners and civilians from 2009-13.
Related TopicsRelated Topics
AfghanistanAfghanistan