This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65876723

The article has changed 11 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 6 Version 7
Boris Johnson asked me to intervene in honours list, says Rishi Sunak Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak trade barbs in row over honours list
(about 1 hour later)
Rishi Sunak: "Boris Johnson asked me to do something that I wasn't prepared to do"Rishi Sunak: "Boris Johnson asked me to do something that I wasn't prepared to do"
Rishi Sunak: "Boris Johnson asked me to do something that I wasn't prepared to do"Rishi Sunak: "Boris Johnson asked me to do something that I wasn't prepared to do"
Rishi Sunak has accused Boris Johnson of asking him to "overrule" a panel vetting his resignation list appointments to the House of Lords. A war of words has erupted between Rishi Sunak and Boris Johnson over the former prime minister's attempt to give peerages to several close allies.
But Mr Johnson has hit back in a fiery statement, accusing Mr Sunak of "talking rubbish". Mr Sunak accused his former boss of asking him to "overrule" the vetting advice on his House of Lords nominations.
The House of Lords Appointments Commission (HOLAC) has confirmed it rejected eight of the former prime minister's nominations. But in a fiery statement, Mr Johnson accused Mr Sunak of "talking rubbish".
Earlier, Mr Sunak said Mr Johnson asked him to override their recommendations. The House of Lords Appointments Commission (HOLAC) said it rejected eight of Mr Johnson's nominations.
Mr Sunak said he refused, adding it was "something I wasn't prepared to do". There has been no confirmation of who the nominees were, and why they were not included on Mr Johnson's controversial resignation honours list.
"I didn't think that was right. And if people don't like that, then tough," Mr Sunak told a tech conference in London. The honours list was published by Mr Sunak's government on Friday, without the names of some of Mr Johnson's key supporters, including Conservative MPs Nadine Dorries and Nigel Adams.
A few hours later, Mr Johnson told the BBC it "was not necessary to overrule HOLAC - but simply to ask them to renew their vetting, which was a mere formality". A few hours after his honours list was released, Mr Johnson announced he was standing down as an MP over an investigating into whether he had misled Parliament about lockdown parties.
The intervention marks a new point in an escalating war of words over Mr Johnson's controversial resignation honours list.
Patel and Rees-Mogg rewarded in Johnson honours listPatel and Rees-Mogg rewarded in Johnson honours list
The ghost of Boris Johnson haunts Rishi SunakThe ghost of Boris Johnson haunts Rishi Sunak
Country doesn't miss Johnson drama, says ShappsCountry doesn't miss Johnson drama, says Shapps
Mr Johnson announced he was quitting Parliament on Friday over a report from the Privileges Committee, who were investigating whether he had misled MPs about lockdown parties in Downing Street. Competing claims have now surfaced about how and why the names would not have appeared on the list.
It came hours after Downing Street published his resignation honours list without the names of key supporters, including Nadine Dorries, Sir Alok Sharma and Nigel Adams. Mr Adams and Ms Dorries have both announced they would immediately standing down as MPs, triggering by-elections to replace them.
All three had been expecting to be appointed to the House of Lords. Competing claims have now surfaced about how and why the names were removed. On Monday, the row over the nominations spilled into a public spat between Mr Johnson and Mr Sunak.
Mr Adams and Ms Dorries have both announced they will be immediately standing down as MPs, triggering by-elections to replace them. Speaking at a tech conference in London earlier, Mr Sunak claimed Mr Johnson had asked him to do "something I wasn't prepared to do" on peerage nominations.
The process of vetting Mr Johnson's nominees for peerages appears to be the one of the points of disagreement between Mr Johnson and Mr Sunak. "I didn't think that was right. And if people don't like that, then tough," Mr Sunak said.
A few hours later, Mr Johnson claimed it "was not necessary to overrule HOLAC - but simply to ask them to renew their vetting, which was a mere formality".
Downing Street did not respond any further, saying the prime minister did not regret his comments and adding: "As I say, he was asked a direct question. He gave a clear answer."
The process of vetting Mr Johnson's nominees for peerages appears to be the one of the points of disagreement between the former allies.
There has been speculation in media reports about what would happen if a serving MP was nominated for a peerage, and whether they could remain in the House of Commons until the next general election, before taking up their seats in the Lords.There has been speculation in media reports about what would happen if a serving MP was nominated for a peerage, and whether they could remain in the House of Commons until the next general election, before taking up their seats in the Lords.
But HOLAC says its vetting checks expire after six months, meaning its advice on nominations is only valid for that period.But HOLAC says its vetting checks expire after six months, meaning its advice on nominations is only valid for that period.
In his statement, Mr Johnson appears to be suggesting the vetting checks for his nominees could be carried out again, at a later date.In his statement, Mr Johnson appears to be suggesting the vetting checks for his nominees could be carried out again, at a later date.
Mr Sunak's comments are the first made publicly about the dispute over peerages, and marks a heightening of tensions between the two.
Their relationship has been an uneasy one after Mr Sunak quit as chancellor in Mr Johnson's government, setting off a wave of resignations that brought down his premiership.
Nominations rowNominations row
As a departing prime minister, Mr Johnson has the right to nominate people for seats in the House of Lords, and for other honours such as knighthoods.As a departing prime minister, Mr Johnson has the right to nominate people for seats in the House of Lords, and for other honours such as knighthoods.
By convention, current prime ministers pass on the list of nominees to HOLAC, which can recommend their names do not go forward after a vetting process.By convention, current prime ministers pass on the list of nominees to HOLAC, which can recommend their names do not go forward after a vetting process.
HOLAC advises prime ministers on the suitability of candidates for peerages and usually, they accept its recommendations on appointments, whatever the outcome.HOLAC advises prime ministers on the suitability of candidates for peerages and usually, they accept its recommendations on appointments, whatever the outcome.
But Mr Johnson broke with this convention in 2020, when he nominated businessman Peter Cruddas for a peerage, despite his rejection by HOLAC.But Mr Johnson broke with this convention in 2020, when he nominated businessman Peter Cruddas for a peerage, despite his rejection by HOLAC.
On Sunday, a spokesman for the vetting commission said it had rejected eight of Mr Johnson's nominations, but declined to name them or say why, adding it "does not comment on individuals".On Sunday, a spokesman for the vetting commission said it had rejected eight of Mr Johnson's nominations, but declined to name them or say why, adding it "does not comment on individuals".
Downing Street has insisted that Mr Sunak passed on Mr Johnson's list of nominations unaltered. It says it also accepted HOLAC's full approved list and passed it to the King.Downing Street has insisted that Mr Sunak passed on Mr Johnson's list of nominations unaltered. It says it also accepted HOLAC's full approved list and passed it to the King.
But on Monday, a source describing themselves as an ally of Mr Johnson accused the prime minister of "secretly" blocking peerages for "Nadine and others".But on Monday, a source describing themselves as an ally of Mr Johnson accused the prime minister of "secretly" blocking peerages for "Nadine and others".
"He refused to ask for them to undergo basic checks that could have taken only a few weeks or even days," the source added."He refused to ask for them to undergo basic checks that could have taken only a few weeks or even days," the source added.
"That is how he kept them off the list - without telling Boris Johnson.""That is how he kept them off the list - without telling Boris Johnson."
Related TopicsRelated Topics
Boris JohnsonBoris Johnson
Rishi SunakRishi Sunak
House of LordsHouse of Lords