This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/jun/12/rishi-sunak-goes-on-offensive-in-row-over-boris-johnson-honours-list

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Rishi Sunak goes on offensive in row over Boris Johnson honours list Sunak and Johnson in war of words over ex-PM’s honours list
(about 3 hours later)
Sunak speaks publicly for first time about row, saying former PM ‘asked me to do something that I wasn’t prepared to do’ Johnson accuses Sunak of ‘talking rubbish’ after PM said predecessor lobbied him to overturn due process
Rishi Sunak has come out fighting against Boris Johnson in the row over the former PM’s failed attempt to give peerages to several close allies. Rishi Sunak and Boris Johnson have engaged in an extraordinary war of words over the former prime minister’s failed attempts to elevate several close allies to the House of Lords.
The prime minister spoke on Monday about the issue for the first time since Friday, when Downing Street published Johnson’s resignation honours list without the names of several of those he wanted to elevate to the House of Lords. The prime minister accused his predecessor on Monday morning of having lobbied him to overturn due process and appoint three Conservative MPs to the House of Lords claims Johnson dismissed publicly as “rubbish”.
Those excised from the peerage list included the Conservative MPs Nadine Dorries, Nigel Adams and Alok Sharma the first two of whom promptly resigned from parliament, along with Johnson, triggering three testing byelections for the Tories. The exchanges brought into the open the long-running dispute between the two men, which has caused a wider rift in the Conservative party and triggered a series of byelections that could test Sunak’s grip on power.
Sunak on Monday pushed back at suggestions by allies of Johnson that the prime minister had given his predecessor assurances that the MPs would be given peerages, either immediately or after the next election. The public row began on Monday morning, three days after Downing Street published Johnson’s resignation honours list without the names of three MPs whom the former prime minister wanted to make peers Nadine Dorries, Nigel Adams and Alok Sharma.
Asked about the row during the London Tech Week conference, Sunak said: “Boris Johnson asked me to do something that I wasn’t prepared to do, because I didn’t think it was right. That was either overrule the Holac [House of Lords Appointments Commission] committee, or make promises to people. Asked about the controversy during a speech at London Tech Week, Sunak defended the decision not to include those names, given that the House of Lords Appointments Commission (Holac) recommends that any MP recommended for a peerage should stand down to take up the new position within six months.
“Boris Johnson asked me to do something that I wasn’t prepared to do, because I didn’t think it was right. That was either overrule the Holac committee, or make promises to people,” he said.
“Now, I wasn’t prepared to do that, so I didn’t think he was right. And if people don’t like that then tough.”“Now, I wasn’t prepared to do that, so I didn’t think he was right. And if people don’t like that then tough.”
The comments mark one of the first times Sunak has spoken publicly about his simmering row with Johnson, which started after Sunak resigned as chancellor in Johnson’s government, helping trigger the latter’s resignation. Johnson hit back within hours, issuing a statement saying: “Rishi Sunak is talking rubbish. To honour these peerages it was not necessary to overrule Holac but simply to ask them to renew their vetting, which was a mere formality.”
Tensions have been reignited in recent weeks by the arguments surrounding Johnson’s honours list, the parliamentary inquiry into Partygate and the Covid-19 inquiry. Johnson’s allies have never forgiven Sunak for his decision to stand down as chancellor last year, a move that helped bring down Johnson as prime minister.
Johnson announced on Friday afternoon he would stand down as an MP with immediate effect, after learning that members of the parliamentary privileges committee were preparing to recommend he be suspended from parliament for at least 10 days. Such a sanction would have triggered a recall petition in his Uxbridge constituency, and potentially a byelection after that. Tensions were renewed over recent weeks over both Johnson’s honours list and the decision by the Cabinet Office to withhold some of the former prime minister’s communications from the Covid-19 inquiry.
Rather than face such a process, Johnson decided to stand down straight away, launching a broadside at the privileges committee as he did so. Over the weekend, his allies also criticised No 10 over the honours list and the submissions to the Covid inquiry. Johnson unexpectedly announced on Friday he would resign as an MP immediately after learning that the House of Commons privileges committee was set to recommend he be suspended for at least 10 days for lying to the house about Partygate.
Johnson’s allies told the Times on Monday the former prime minister believed he had been given assurances by Sunak during a 45-meeting over a week ago that the MPs would be given their peerages. Downing Street sources have denied this characterisation of their conversation however, insisting Sunak was keen not to make any promises to his predecessor. Dorries and Adams also resigned, setting up three difficult byelections for the Conservatives within the next few months. Dorries told the Times on Monday she believed Downing Street had “withheld information”, leading her to believe incorrectly that she would be given a peerage
Sign up to First EditionSign up to First Edition
Archie Bland and Nimo Omer take you through the top stories and what they mean, free every weekday morningArchie Bland and Nimo Omer take you through the top stories and what they mean, free every weekday morning
after newsletter promotionafter newsletter promotion
Dorries told the Times on Monday she believed Downing Street “deliberately withheld information” during the vetting process before the list was published. Sunak’s allies toured the broadcasting studios on Sunday and Monday trying to draw a line under the affair, with both Grant Shapps, the energy secretary, and Michael Gove, the communities secretary, suggesting it was time to move on from the drama of the Johnson years.
However, ministers have sought to push the blame on to Johnson for any misunderstanding. Grant Shapps, the energy secretary, told Sky News on Sunday: “Occasionally Boris wouldn’t be all over the detail I don’t know if that’s what happened in this particular case.” Sunak’s official spokesperson said on Monday it was “entirely untrue” that the prime minister or his No 10 team removed names from Johnson’s peerages list.Downing Street received the final list from Holac, which confirmed at the weekend it had rejected eight of the proposed peerages, in February. Since then, the government has been waiting for the Cabinet Office to finish vetting names put forward for other honours.
Sunak’s official spokesperson said it was “entirely untrue” that the prime minister or his No 10 team removed names from Johnson’s peerages list.Downing Street received the final list from Holac, which confirmed at the weekend it had rejected eight of the proposed peerages, in February. Since then, the government has been waiting for the Cabinet Office to finish vetting names put forward for other honours.Initially, the delay was attributed to the large number of the honours Johnson wanted to bestow on his close friends and confidantes, reportedly including a knighthood for his father, Stanley.Downing Street also defended the work of MPs on the privileges committee, which has been the focus of attacks by Johnson and his allies.Sunak’s official spokesperson said: “This is a properly set-up committee that the house has voted to carry out their work. The government will in no way traduce or criticise the work of the committee who are doing exactly what parliament has asked them to do.”Asked about reports that committee members had been offered security as a result of the attacks, the spokesperson added: “Clearly, any threats against any MPs are completely unacceptable.” Initially, the delay was attributed to the large number of honours Johnson wanted to bestow on his close friends and confidants, reportedly including a knighthood for his father, Stanley.Downing Street also defended the work of MPs on the privileges committee, which has been the focus of attacks by Johnson and his allies.Sunak’s official spokesperson said: “This is a properly set-up committee that the house has voted to carry out their work. The government will in no way traduce or criticise the work of the committee who are doing exactly what parliament has asked them to do.”Asked about reports that committee members had been offered security as a result of the attacks, the spokesperson added: “Clearly, any threats against any MPs are completely unacceptable.”
Some of Johnson’s parliamentary allies rallied to his cause later in the day, with Jake Berry, the Tory backbencher, telling reporters on Monday: “The establishment has seen Boris out the door.”
However, a wider rebellion by Johnson supporters seemed to have been averted, with little sign that Sharma or others were prepared to resign their seats in protest at Downing Street.