This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/12/us/montana-youth-climate-trial.html

The article has changed 10 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
A Youth Climate Case Years in the Making Goes to Trial in Montana A Youth Climate Case Years in the Making Goes to Trial in Montana
(about 1 hour later)
A landmark climate change trial began Monday in Montana, where a group of youths has sued government leaders, accusing them of embracing fossil fuels in ways that are destroying the environment and robbing the futures of the state’s young residents. A landmark climate change trial opened on Monday in Montana, where a group of youths are contending that the state’s embrace of fossil fuels is destroying pristine environments, upending cultural traditions and robbing young residents of a healthy future.
The lawsuit, more than a decade in the making, is the first of a number of similar efforts to go to trial in the United States. The 16 plaintiffs contend that the state government has failed to live up to its constitutional mandate to “maintain and improve a clean and healthful environment in Montana for present and future generations.” In opening statements for a case that has been more than a decade in the making, a lawyer for the 16 plaintiffs described how the effects of drought, wildfire, violent storms, air pollution and heat waves were already changing the lives of young people and threatened to become more severe unless there is a change of course.
The two-week trial, with opening statements beginning Monday morning, will determine whether a judge should declare that the state’s support for the fossil fuel industry is unconstitutional, Such a finding would put legal pressure on government leaders to take action, and set a tone for other states that are watching how the proceedings unfold. “Montana’s warming climate will have cascading environmental and economic impacts,” said Roger Sullivan, a lawyer for the young residents, who range in age from 5 to 22.
The effects of a warming climate are already spreading across Montana, including shrinking glaciers at Glacier National Park and a lengthening wildfire season that threatens the state’s treasured outdoor pastimes. The plaintiffs in the case, ranging in age from 5 to 22, have said the state’s inaction on climate change threatens their ability to access clean water, sustain family ranches or continue hunting traditions. A number of similar lawsuits are pending around the country, but Montana’s case is the first to go to trial. The plaintiffs contend that the state government has failed to live up to its constitutional mandate to “maintain and improve a clean and healthful environment in Montana for present and future generations.”
State leaders have fought the accusations, calling the proceedings a show trial and a “gross injustice.”
“Montana’s emissions are simply too minuscule to make any difference,” ​​Michael Russell, an assistant attorney general, said during the state’s opening statement. “Climate change is a global issue that effectively relegates Montana’s role to that of a spectator.”
The two-week trial will determine whether a judge should declare that the state’s support for the fossil fuel industry is unconstitutional, Such a finding would put legal pressure on government leaders to take action, and set a tone for other states that are watching how the proceedings unfold.
The effects of a warming climate are already spreading across Montana, including shrinking glaciers at Glacier National Park and a lengthening wildfire season that threatens the state’s treasured outdoor pastimes. The plaintiffs in the case have said the state’s inaction on climate change threatens their ability to access clean water, sustain family ranches or continue hunting traditions.
They have personally experienced daunting signs of the future, not only the smoke from wildfires but also the flooding at Yellowstone National Park.They have personally experienced daunting signs of the future, not only the smoke from wildfires but also the flooding at Yellowstone National Park.
Julia Olson, the executive director of Our Children’s Trust, the environmental nonprofit that helped bring the Montana lawsuit, said the case had the potential to set a new course for a healthier and more prosperous future for the generations to come. Many of the young plaintiffs planned to testify.Julia Olson, the executive director of Our Children’s Trust, the environmental nonprofit that helped bring the Montana lawsuit, said the case had the potential to set a new course for a healthier and more prosperous future for the generations to come. Many of the young plaintiffs planned to testify.
“The story that will be told at trial is an important American story,” Ms. Olson said. “It’s a dramatic story.”“The story that will be told at trial is an important American story,” Ms. Olson said. “It’s a dramatic story.”
Montana, whose unofficial nicknames include the “Treasure State,” has long had its fortunes yoked to the mining industry. Helena, the state capital, where the climate case is being tried, was founded in the 1860s by gold prospectors. Montana is the nation’s fifth-largest coal-producing state and the 12th-largest oil-producing state.Montana, whose unofficial nicknames include the “Treasure State,” has long had its fortunes yoked to the mining industry. Helena, the state capital, where the climate case is being tried, was founded in the 1860s by gold prospectors. Montana is the nation’s fifth-largest coal-producing state and the 12th-largest oil-producing state.
Earlier this year, continuing to demonstrate the state’s support of fossil fuels, Republican lawmakers approved a law that prohibits state regulators from considering the impact on climate when assessing large projects like new power plants or factories.Earlier this year, continuing to demonstrate the state’s support of fossil fuels, Republican lawmakers approved a law that prohibits state regulators from considering the impact on climate when assessing large projects like new power plants or factories.
However, the state has also long treasured its unspoiled landscapes and crystal-clear lakes, embracing another unofficial nickname, “The Last Best Place.” The state added the language to its Constitution about the right to a clean and healthful environment in 1972 in response to growing concern about protecting those assets.However, the state has also long treasured its unspoiled landscapes and crystal-clear lakes, embracing another unofficial nickname, “The Last Best Place.” The state added the language to its Constitution about the right to a clean and healthful environment in 1972 in response to growing concern about protecting those assets.
State leaders have resisted the climate lawsuit, which had its roots in an unsuccessful effort in 2011 that pressed the state Supreme Court to force the state to take action on climate change. As part of the case, state officials have disputed the overwhelming scientific consensus that the burning of fossil fuels is changing the global climate; denied that severe weather events in the state were linked to rising air temperatures; and contended that Montana contributes a trivial amount of greenhouse gasses to the atmosphere, compared with the rest of the world. State leaders have resisted the climate lawsuit, which had its roots in an unsuccessful effort in 2011 that pressed the state Supreme Court to force the state to take action on climate change. As part of the case, state officials have disputed the overwhelming scientific consensus that the burning of fossil fuels is changing the global climate and denied that severe weather events in the state were linked to rising air temperatures.
Lawyers for the state have unsuccessfully tried to block the case from proceeding to trial. In a recent court motion, they wrote that the process would become a “show” trial that amounted a “gross injustice.”
Our Children’s Trust has undertaken legal action in every state on the climate issue, and several of the group’s lawsuits are pending. The group won another preliminary victory on June 1 when a judge ruled that a youth case in Oregon, aimed at the federal government, could go to trial.Our Children’s Trust has undertaken legal action in every state on the climate issue, and several of the group’s lawsuits are pending. The group won another preliminary victory on June 1 when a judge ruled that a youth case in Oregon, aimed at the federal government, could go to trial.