This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/jun/15/boris-johnson-allies-fury-partygate-report

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Boris Johnson allies voice fury at ‘vindictive’ Partygate report Boris Johnson allies threaten to target Tories who back Partygate report for deselection
(about 4 hours later)
Some make threats that Tories who endorse privileges committee’s finding could face deselection Supporters of ex-PM voice fury at ‘vindictive’ privileges committee finding that he deliberately misled parliament
Boris Johnson’s supporters have reacted with fury to the privileges committee’s finding that he misled parliament, with some making open threats that Tories who vote to endorse the report could face deselection by their members. Supporters of Boris Johnson have vowed to target Conservative members of the privileges committee and Tory MPs who endorse its findings for deselection, as the aftermath of the report prompted vicious internal infighting.
Nadine Dorries, the former culture secretary who has vowed to resign as an MP amid a row over whether she was wrongly denied a peerage, said the report was “quite bizarre” and showed an inbuilt bias from the committee, its chair, Harriet Harman, and the Tory member Bernard Jenkin. One ally of the former prime minister said they expected Bernard Jenkin, the most senior Tory on the committee, which said Johnson misled parliament in denying any lockdown-breaking parties, could be a particular focus in his Harwich and North Essex seat.
“This report has overreached and revealed its true predetermined intentions,” she tweeted, after it found Johnson in contempt of parliament, recommending he should be suspended for 90 days if he had not already stepped down as an MP. It remains to be seen, however, whether there is much remaining appetite in the Conservative party at large, and especially in the parliamentary party, for Johnson-backing sabotage in advance of a vote on the report on Monday.
“Harman declared her position before it began. Jenkin, the most senior MP on committee attended an ACTUAL party,” she added, a reference to unproven allegations made on Wednesday by the Guido Fawkes website. In the hours after it was published, saying the former prime minister would have been suspended from the Commons for 90 days if he had not stepped down as an MP last week, a series of supporters condemned the findings as unfair, excessive and biased.
“Any Conservative MP who would vote for this report is fundamentally not a Conservative and will be held to account by members and the public. Deselections may follow. It’s serious. MPs will now have to show this committee what real justice looks like and how it’s done.” “They just don’t realise the extent of anger they have created, and that will be manifested,” one Johnson backer said.
Were Dorries herself not about to step down, she could have found herself investigated by the privileges committee, which warned in its report that it could not countenance a “sustained attempt, seemingly coordinated, to undermine the committee’s credibility”. However, such comments came entirely from existing and diehard Johnson supporters, many of whom had been given or promised honours by the former prime minister.
The committee would publish a separate special report on these attacks, it added. The conclusions will be put to a free vote of MPs on Monday, which will prove the key test of how much support Johnson still has on the Tory benches.
So far such reactions have come from a handful of existing and diehard Johnson supporters, many of whom had been given or promised honours by the former prime minister. With the vote expected to be subject to just a one-line whip, making attendance optional, it seems likely a number of Conservative MPs will simply miss it altogether.
The threat of deselections was also made by David Campbell Bannerman, the former MEP who co-heads the pro-Johnson Conservative Democratic Organisation (CDO), a newly created Tory grassroots group.
“CDO is preparing to give advice on deselections/votes of no confidence for the benefit of members who wish to take matters further,” he tweeted. “Up to them of course – as it should be.”
Speaking later to Times Radio, he said: “Any Tory MP, in my view, that backs this is anti-democratic, and they will face a vote of no confidence at the selection, because members will be that angry that they will hold them to account on this.”
Brendan Clarke-Smith, a Johnson loyalist elected in his 2019 landslide, tweeted that he was “appalled at what I have read and the spiteful, vindictive and overreaching conclusions of the report”.
He added: “I won’t be supporting the recommendations and will be speaking against them both publicly and in the house on Monday. I’m backing fairness and justice – not kangaroo courts.”
The conclusions of the report will be put to a free vote of MPs on Monday, which will prove the key test of how much support Johnson still has on the Tory benches.
Penny Mordaunt, the Commons leader, told MPs as she announced the timetable that her advice was that they should “read the report ... make their own judgments about it, and take the task that is our privilege to do seriously and soberly”.Penny Mordaunt, the Commons leader, told MPs as she announced the timetable that her advice was that they should “read the report ... make their own judgments about it, and take the task that is our privilege to do seriously and soberly”.
But with opposition parties set to turn out en masse to back the motion, which can be amended, even some Johnson supporters said they expected it to pass.
Sign up to The Guardian Headlines UKSign up to The Guardian Headlines UK
A digest of the morning's main headlines emailed direct to you every week dayA digest of the morning's main headlines emailed direct to you every week day
after newsletter promotionafter newsletter promotion
Jacob Rees-Mogg, who was knighted in Johnson’s resignation honours list, quoted Clarke-Smith’s tweet, adding: “When parliament stands upon its dignity it often ends up looking foolish. The privileges committee report is a case in point.” “Inevitably Boris will lose the vote because you have the whole of the opposition against him, but you also have the Boris haters in the Conservative party,” Jacob Rees-Mogg, the former cabinet minister who was knighted in Johnson’s resignation honours list, told Sky News.
One of the first to condemn the report was Nadine Dorries, the former culture secretary and key Johnson ally, who has vowed to resign as an MP amid a row over whether she was wrongly denied a peerage in his honours list.
Dorries said the report was “quite bizarre”, warning Tory MPs who voted to endorse it that they would face repercussions, also singling out Jenkin for criticism.
“Any Conservative MP who would vote for this report is fundamentally not a Conservative and will be held to account by members and the public. Deselections may follow. It’s serious. MPs will now have to show this committee what real justice looks like and how it’s done.”
Brendan Clarke-Smith, a Johnson loyalist elected in his 2019 landslide, tweeted that he was “appalled at what I have read and the spiteful, vindictive and overreaching conclusions of the report”, adding that he would vote against the findings on Monday.
Simon Clarke, another former minister, and also knighted by Johnson, said: “I am amazed at the harshness of today’s report by the privileges committee. I believed Boris before and I believe him today. This punishment is absolutely extraordinary to the point of sheer vindictiveness, and I will vote against this report on Monday.”Simon Clarke, another former minister, and also knighted by Johnson, said: “I am amazed at the harshness of today’s report by the privileges committee. I believed Boris before and I believe him today. This punishment is absolutely extraordinary to the point of sheer vindictiveness, and I will vote against this report on Monday.”
James Duddridge, an MP who served as Johnson’s parliamentary private secretary for some of his time in No 10 and was previously knighted by him, likened the committee’s verdict to medieval punishment.James Duddridge, an MP who served as Johnson’s parliamentary private secretary for some of his time in No 10 and was previously knighted by him, likened the committee’s verdict to medieval punishment.
“Why not go the full way, put Boris in the stocks and providing rotten food to throw … at him,” he tweeted. “Moving him around the marginals, so the country could share in the humiliation. History will hold Boris in higher regard than this committee. I thank him for his service.”“Why not go the full way, put Boris in the stocks and providing rotten food to throw … at him,” he tweeted. “Moving him around the marginals, so the country could share in the humiliation. History will hold Boris in higher regard than this committee. I thank him for his service.”
Other support for Johnson came from Michael Fabricant, also knighted in Johnson’s resignation honours list, who told the BBC that when the former PM gave evidence to the committee, some members “were pulling faces, were looking heavenwards, were indicating they didn’t agree with what Boris was saying”, indicating preconceived bias.Other support for Johnson came from Michael Fabricant, also knighted in Johnson’s resignation honours list, who told the BBC that when the former PM gave evidence to the committee, some members “were pulling faces, were looking heavenwards, were indicating they didn’t agree with what Boris was saying”, indicating preconceived bias.
Jake Berry, also previously knighted by Johnson, suggested his removal as an MP was an attempt by “the blob” to distract from soaring mortgage rates.Jake Berry, also previously knighted by Johnson, suggested his removal as an MP was an attempt by “the blob” to distract from soaring mortgage rates.
Andrea Jenkyns, who was made a dame in the resignation honours, tweeted a photo saying: “I’m backing Boris.”Andrea Jenkyns, who was made a dame in the resignation honours, tweeted a photo saying: “I’m backing Boris.”
Zac Goldsmith, the former Tory MP made a peer by Johnson, condemned the length of the proposed suspension, tweeting: “This is so obviously ridiculous (& vindictive). If they’d been clever, they would have recommended a 9-day ban.”Zac Goldsmith, the former Tory MP made a peer by Johnson, condemned the length of the proposed suspension, tweeting: “This is so obviously ridiculous (& vindictive). If they’d been clever, they would have recommended a 9-day ban.”