This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/business/2023/jun/22/legal-challenge-against-sizewell-c-nuclear-power-plant-rejected

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Legal challenge against Sizewell C nuclear power plant rejected Legal challenge against Sizewell C nuclear power plant rejected
(32 minutes later)
High court judge rules in favour of government decision to let EDF build plant on the Suffolk coastHigh court judge rules in favour of government decision to let EDF build plant on the Suffolk coast
A legal challenge against the government’s decision to build the Sizewell C nuclear power plant has been rejected.A legal challenge against the government’s decision to build the Sizewell C nuclear power plant has been rejected.
The campaign group Together Against Sizewell C (TASC) had launched a judicial review against the government’s decision to give the green light to the 3.2 gigawatt plant on the Suffolk coast, which is being built by French energy giant EDF. The campaign group Together Against Sizewell C (TASC) had launched a judicial review against the government’s decision to give the green light to the 3.2 gigawatt plant on the Suffolk coast, which is being built by French energy company EDF.
The group said the government had failed to consider alternatives to nuclear power to meet its emissions targets when approving the project. The group said the government had failed to consider alternatives to nuclear power to meet its emissions targets when approving the project. It cited the threat to water supplies in an area officially designated as seriously water-stressed, the threats to coastal areas from the climate crisis, and environmental damage.
It cited the threat to water supplies in an area officially designated as seriously water stressed, the threats to coastal areas from the climate crisis, and environmental damage. Judge David Holgate rejected the group’s challenge against the secretary of state for energy security and net zero in a written ruling at the high court on Thursday. Holgate ruled the government’s decision was in keeping with energy policy intended to achieve “diversity of methods of generation and security of supply”.
Judge David Holgate rejected the group’s challenge against the secretary of state for energy security and net zero in a written ruling at the high court on Thursday.
Holgate ruled the government’s decision was in keeping with energy policy intended to achieve “diversity of methods of generation and security of supply”.
He said the judicial review was an attempt to “rewrite the government’s policy aims by pretending that the central policy objective is … to produce clean energy, without any regard to diversity of energy sources and security of supply.”He said the judicial review was an attempt to “rewrite the government’s policy aims by pretending that the central policy objective is … to produce clean energy, without any regard to diversity of energy sources and security of supply.”
TASC said it would continue its campaign and was examining options for how to do so.TASC said it would continue its campaign and was examining options for how to do so.
Sizewell got the go-ahead from government last year, when the former business secretary, Kwasi Kwarteng, overruled a verdict from the independent Planning Inspectorate. Sizewell got the go-ahead from government last year, when the former business secretary, Kwasi Kwarteng, overruled a verdict from the independent Planning Inspectorate. The planning body had said that “unless the outstanding water supply strategy can be resolved and sufficient information provided to enable the secretary of state to carry out his obligations under the Habitats Regulations, the case for an order granting development consent for the application is not made out”.
The planning body had said that “unless the outstanding water supply strategy can be resolved and sufficient information provided to enable the secretary of state to carry out his obligations under the Habitats Regulations, the case for an order granting development consent for the application is not made out”. Kwarteng’s decision to override these concerns came against the backdrop of plans to approve one new nuclear reactor a year, under an energy strategy drawn up under the former prime minister Boris Johnson. The strategy envisaged the UK sourcing up to 25% of its projected energy demand from nuclear by 2050.
Kwarteng’s decision to override these concerns came against the backdrop of plans to approve one new nuclear reactor a year, under an energy strategy drawn up under former prime minister Boris Johnson. The strategy envisaged the UK sourcing up to 25% of its projected energy demand from nuclear by 2050. Sue Ferns, a senior deputy general secretary of the trade union Prospect, said the ruling “removes one of the blocks” to getting Sizewell C started. “Nuclear must play an important role in our energy mix as we race to net zero. We now need to get on with building Sizewell C, and secure the jobs, economic benefits and clean reliable energy it will bring.”
Sue Ferns, senior deputy general secretary of the trade union Prospect, said the ruling “removes one of the blocks” to getting Sizewell C started. The TASC chair, Jenny Kirtley, said: “Naturally, TASC is disappointed, but this verdict does not signal the end of our efforts. Together with our lawyers we are examining all possible options open to us and can promise our supporters that in one form or another, this campaign will continue.
Sign up to Business TodaySign up to Business Today
Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morningGet set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning
after newsletter promotionafter newsletter promotion
“Nuclear must play an important role in our energy mix as we race to net zero. We now need to get on with building Sizewell C, and secure the jobs, economic benefits and clean reliable energy it will bring.” “The Suffolk Heritage Coast cannot be sacrificed for such an unnecessary and inappropriate development, and we will examine every avenue of opposition until all are exhausted.”
TASC chairperson, Jenny Kirtley, said: “Naturally, TASC is disappointed, but this verdict does not signal the end of our efforts.
“Together with our lawyers we are examining all possible options open to us and can promise our supporters that in one form or another, this campaign will continue.
“The Suffolk Heritage Coast cannot be sacrificed for such an unnecessary and inappropriate development, and we will examine every avenue of opposition until all are exhausted”.
The Guardian has approached EDF for comment.The Guardian has approached EDF for comment.