This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/27/world/europe/prince-harry-phone-hacking-lawsuit.html

The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Prince Harry’s Lawyers Make Closing Remarks: What to Know About the Court Case Prince Harry’s Lawyers Make Closing Remarks: What to Know About the Court Case
(32 minutes later)
Prince Harry’s lawyers began their closing statements on Tuesday in a lawsuit against the British media company Mirror Group Newspapers, which he has accused of hacking his cellphone more than a decade ago.Prince Harry’s lawyers began their closing statements on Tuesday in a lawsuit against the British media company Mirror Group Newspapers, which he has accused of hacking his cellphone more than a decade ago.
The lawsuit is part of a yearslong feud between Harry and the British tabloids, and one of several cases he has brought against newspaper publishers. During this case, the prince gave evidence over two days, becoming the first prominent member of the royal family to testify in court in over 130 years.The lawsuit is part of a yearslong feud between Harry and the British tabloids, and one of several cases he has brought against newspaper publishers. During this case, the prince gave evidence over two days, becoming the first prominent member of the royal family to testify in court in over 130 years.
This week, both David Sherborne, Prince Harry’s lawyer, and Andrew Green, a lawyer for the Mirror Group, will address the judge, Timothy Fancourt.This week, both David Sherborne, Prince Harry’s lawyer, and Andrew Green, a lawyer for the Mirror Group, will address the judge, Timothy Fancourt.
It is likely that the lawyers will discuss Harry’s testimony in their closing remarks, potentially addressing the evidence he gave and the question of his credibility. In his introduction on Tuesday, Mr. Sherborne charged that unlawful news gathering by the Mirror group had been “widespread” and “habitual.”
Harry’s legal team has detailed what they consider the unlawful means the company used to get private information about him for a series of articles it published from 1996 to 2011. The case is focused on accusations that throughout the early 2000s, the company hacked Harry’s phone, as well as those of his brother, William, a girlfriend and some aides. Harry brought the lawsuit alongside three other claimants. During the case, Harry’s legal team has detailed unlawful means that they say the company used to get private information about him for a series of articles that it published from 1996 to 2011. The case focuses on accusations that throughout the early 2000s, the company hacked Harry’s phone, as well as those of his brother, William, a girlfriend and some aides. Harry has brought the lawsuit alongside three other claimants.
Harry’s legal team argued that the illegal reporting methods had resulted in invasive articles that hurt Harry’s trust in his friends and put a strain on his relationship with his then-girlfriend, Chelsy Davy.Harry’s legal team argued that the illegal reporting methods had resulted in invasive articles that hurt Harry’s trust in his friends and put a strain on his relationship with his then-girlfriend, Chelsy Davy.
The Mirror Group’s lead lawyer, Andrew Green, said in court that there was no evidence Prince Harry was ever hacked. Mr. Green’s legal team has argued that suspicion of phone hacking is not proof, and that some of the articles in question had been published before the prince had a cellphone.The Mirror Group’s lead lawyer, Andrew Green, said in court that there was no evidence Prince Harry was ever hacked. Mr. Green’s legal team has argued that suspicion of phone hacking is not proof, and that some of the articles in question had been published before the prince had a cellphone.
He added that by 2009, employees of another tabloid, The News of the World, owned by Rupert Murdoch, had been sentenced to jail for phone hacking, making it unlikely that the Mirror Group’s journalists would run the risk of doing the same.He added that by 2009, employees of another tabloid, The News of the World, owned by Rupert Murdoch, had been sentenced to jail for phone hacking, making it unlikely that the Mirror Group’s journalists would run the risk of doing the same.
They also said Harry had waited too long to sue.They also said Harry had waited too long to sue.
During the lawsuit, Harry condemned the British tabloid press and its methods, asking, “How much more blood will stain their typing fingers before someone can put a stop to this madness?”During the lawsuit, Harry condemned the British tabloid press and its methods, asking, “How much more blood will stain their typing fingers before someone can put a stop to this madness?”
He added that the tabloids’ actions had affected every area of his life, spurring “bouts of depression and paranoia.”He added that the tabloids’ actions had affected every area of his life, spurring “bouts of depression and paranoia.”
Harry said the persona that the tabloids created, a portrayal of him as the “thicko,” the “cheat,” the “underage drinker” and the “irresponsible drug taker,” had come to overshadow his life. And he said that press intrusion had been “the main factor” in his breakup with Ms. Davy.Harry said the persona that the tabloids created, a portrayal of him as the “thicko,” the “cheat,” the “underage drinker” and the “irresponsible drug taker,” had come to overshadow his life. And he said that press intrusion had been “the main factor” in his breakup with Ms. Davy.
The judge’s decision will most likely be handed down two to three months after the end of the hearing, said Ahlia Rateb, a clerk to the judge. The judge’s decision is expected to be handed down two to three months after the end of the hearing, said Ahlia Rateb, a clerk to the judge.