This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-66063912

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Challenge to Covid inquiry over Johnson WhatsApps in court Challenge to Covid inquiry over Johnson WhatsApps in court
(32 minutes later)
The government's legal challenge to the Covid inquiry's demand to see Boris Johnson's diaries and WhatsApps in full gets under way later. The government's legal challenge to the Covid inquiry's demand to see Boris Johnson's diaries and WhatsApps in full is under way in the High Court.
The Cabinet Office rejected the demand, arguing it should not have to hand over material it does not consider relevant.The Cabinet Office rejected the demand, arguing it should not have to hand over material it does not consider relevant.
Covid inquiry chair Baroness Hallett says it should be up to her decide what is relevant.Covid inquiry chair Baroness Hallett says it should be up to her decide what is relevant.
The government took the unprecedented step of bringing a judicial review of Baroness Hallett's order.The government took the unprecedented step of bringing a judicial review of Baroness Hallett's order.
It is the first time a government has mounted a legal challenge to an inquiry it set up itself.It is the first time a government has mounted a legal challenge to an inquiry it set up itself.
At a High Court hearing on Friday, the Cabinet Office's lawyers will argue that the inquiry does not have the legal power to force ministers to release documents and messages which it says are "unambiguously irrelevant" and cover matters "unconnected to the government's handling of Covid".At a High Court hearing on Friday, the Cabinet Office's lawyers will argue that the inquiry does not have the legal power to force ministers to release documents and messages which it says are "unambiguously irrelevant" and cover matters "unconnected to the government's handling of Covid".
Covid inquiry criticises government evidenceCovid inquiry criticises government evidence
What is the UK Covid inquiry and how long will it take?What is the UK Covid inquiry and how long will it take?
They will say there are "important issues of principle at stake" affecting the rights of individuals and "the proper conduct of government".They will say there are "important issues of principle at stake" affecting the rights of individuals and "the proper conduct of government".
In written documents filed at the court, government lawyer Sir James Eadie KC said the Cabinet Office "well understands" Lady Hallett's concern to ensure she has all the material she needs to reach "soundly based conclusions on the matters she is inquiring into".In written documents filed at the court, government lawyer Sir James Eadie KC said the Cabinet Office "well understands" Lady Hallett's concern to ensure she has all the material she needs to reach "soundly based conclusions on the matters she is inquiring into".
But he adds that there are "real concerns" that "individuals, junior officials, current and former ministers and departments should not be required to provide material that is irrelevant to the inquiry's work".But he adds that there are "real concerns" that "individuals, junior officials, current and former ministers and departments should not be required to provide material that is irrelevant to the inquiry's work".
'All relevant material''All relevant material'
"It is sharpened by the fact that irrelevant material contains 'references to personal and family information, including illness and disciplinary matters' and 'comments of a personal nature about identified or identifiable individuals which are unrelated to Covid-19 or that individual's role in connection with the response to it'", the statement says."It is sharpened by the fact that irrelevant material contains 'references to personal and family information, including illness and disciplinary matters' and 'comments of a personal nature about identified or identifiable individuals which are unrelated to Covid-19 or that individual's role in connection with the response to it'", the statement says.
Baroness Hallett is chairing the Covid inquiryBaroness Hallett is chairing the Covid inquiry
The messages "may well be sensitive for a whole variety of reasons - for example to do with personal privacy, to do with other aspects of the work of government, or simply to do with the informal nature of the sort of communication that occurs on WhatsApp."The messages "may well be sensitive for a whole variety of reasons - for example to do with personal privacy, to do with other aspects of the work of government, or simply to do with the informal nature of the sort of communication that occurs on WhatsApp."
The public can be "entirely confident" that the inquiry will receive "every scrap of relevant material", adds Sir James.The public can be "entirely confident" that the inquiry will receive "every scrap of relevant material", adds Sir James.
Boris Johnson has handed over WhatsApp messages, diaries and personal notebooks to the Cabinet Office in unredacted form.Boris Johnson has handed over WhatsApp messages, diaries and personal notebooks to the Cabinet Office in unredacted form.
In a statement to the court, senior civil servant Ellie Nicholson said the Cabinet Office was reviewing the material "for national security sensitivities and unambiguously irrelevant material, and appropriate redactions are being applied".In a statement to the court, senior civil servant Ellie Nicholson said the Cabinet Office was reviewing the material "for national security sensitivities and unambiguously irrelevant material, and appropriate redactions are being applied".
But the former PM's WhatsApp messages cover the period only after May 2021, meaning they would be of limited use to the inquiry, which is looking at decisions made during the pandemic.But the former PM's WhatsApp messages cover the period only after May 2021, meaning they would be of limited use to the inquiry, which is looking at decisions made during the pandemic.
This was due to a "well-publicised security breach", writes Ms Nicholson.This was due to a "well-publicised security breach", writes Ms Nicholson.
Mr Johnson was forced to change his mobile phone in 2021 after it emerged his number had been publicly available online for 15 years.Mr Johnson was forced to change his mobile phone in 2021 after it emerged his number had been publicly available online for 15 years.
The former prime minister wrote to the inquiry after the Cabinet Office launched the judicial review, saying he was "more than happy" to hand over his unredacted WhatsApp messages and notebooks directly to the inquiry.The former prime minister wrote to the inquiry after the Cabinet Office launched the judicial review, saying he was "more than happy" to hand over his unredacted WhatsApp messages and notebooks directly to the inquiry.
He is believed to have written to the Cabinet Office to ask whether security and technical support can be given to help retrieve the content on the device without compromising security.He is believed to have written to the Cabinet Office to ask whether security and technical support can be given to help retrieve the content on the device without compromising security.
The High Court hearing, before Lord Justice Dingemans and Mr Justice Garnham, is due to begin at 10;30 BST on Friday and conclude on Monday.
Related TopicsRelated Topics
Coronavirus public inquiryCoronavirus public inquiry
Boris JohnsonBoris Johnson
Cabinet OfficeCabinet Office