This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/england/london/8262629.stm

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
No prosecution for fatal shooting No prosecution for fatal shooting
(10 minutes later)
No police marksmen will be prosecuted over the fatal shooting of barrister Mark Saunders in a south London siege, the Crown Prosecution Service said.No police marksmen will be prosecuted over the fatal shooting of barrister Mark Saunders in a south London siege, the Crown Prosecution Service said.
Mr Saunders, 32, died after being shot at least five times by police officers in Chelsea, west London, in May 2008.Mr Saunders, 32, died after being shot at least five times by police officers in Chelsea, west London, in May 2008.
The barrister shot at police, neighbours and buildings in a five-hour stand-off at his Markham Square home.The barrister shot at police, neighbours and buildings in a five-hour stand-off at his Markham Square home.
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said there was insufficient evidence to charge anyone after the siege.The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said there was insufficient evidence to charge anyone after the siege.
Mr Saunders threw a letter addressed to his wife from his window during the 6 May 2008 siege.Mr Saunders threw a letter addressed to his wife from his window during the 6 May 2008 siege.
Negligence consideredNegligence considered
Charges of murder, attempted murder and manslaughter were considered against seven officers who fired 11 bullets at Mr Saunders.Charges of murder, attempted murder and manslaughter were considered against seven officers who fired 11 bullets at Mr Saunders.
But the CPS found no "realistic prospect" of prosecutors proving beyond reasonable doubt that the armed officers did not act in self defence.But the CPS found no "realistic prospect" of prosecutors proving beyond reasonable doubt that the armed officers did not act in self defence.
The CPS also considered charges of gross negligence and misconduct, and health and safety charges against those in charge of the operation.The CPS also considered charges of gross negligence and misconduct, and health and safety charges against those in charge of the operation.
We recognise this was a tragic incident... but the police have a duty to protect the public and the right to defend themselves Sally Walsh, CPSWe recognise this was a tragic incident... but the police have a duty to protect the public and the right to defend themselves Sally Walsh, CPS
CPS reviewing lawyer Sally Walsh said: "Following the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) investigation into the shooting of Mark Saunders, I have reviewed the evidence and concluded that there is insufficient evidence to charge any officer in relation to these sad events."CPS reviewing lawyer Sally Walsh said: "Following the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) investigation into the shooting of Mark Saunders, I have reviewed the evidence and concluded that there is insufficient evidence to charge any officer in relation to these sad events."
All seven firearms officers stated they were acting in self-defence or in defence of colleagues during the incident, Ms Walsh said.All seven firearms officers stated they were acting in self-defence or in defence of colleagues during the incident, Ms Walsh said.
"Therefore a prosecution for any of these offences would require, amongst other things, the CPS to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the officers did not honestly and genuinely believe that either they or others were in immediate danger," she said."Therefore a prosecution for any of these offences would require, amongst other things, the CPS to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the officers did not honestly and genuinely believe that either they or others were in immediate danger," she said.
"We recognise this was a tragic incident and that Mr Saunders was in a distressed state at the time of his death, but the police have a duty to protect the public and the right to defend themselves.""We recognise this was a tragic incident and that Mr Saunders was in a distressed state at the time of his death, but the police have a duty to protect the public and the right to defend themselves."
Ms Saunders said she has offered to meet Mr Saunders' widow Elizabeth to provide a detailed explanation of her decision. Ms Walsh said she has offered to meet Mr Saunders' widow Elizabeth to provide a detailed explanation of her decision.
'Deflect attention''Deflect attention'
A Metropolitan Police spokesman said: "No officer would ever wish to have to shoot someone during the course of their duty, but they are prepared to take the most appropriate action where necessary to protect the public and their colleagues.
"Any loss of life, no matter what the circumstances, is a tragedy. Our thoughts remain with the family of Mr Saunders."
An Independent Police Complaints Commission inquiry will not be made public until a full inquest into Mr Saunders' death has been held.An Independent Police Complaints Commission inquiry will not be made public until a full inquest into Mr Saunders' death has been held.
A statement issued by solicitors acting for his wife, said: "Elizabeth now awaits the inquest which will consider in public why it was necessary for police officers to shoot her husband.A statement issued by solicitors acting for his wife, said: "Elizabeth now awaits the inquest which will consider in public why it was necessary for police officers to shoot her husband.
"She is concerned that nothing should be allowed to deflect attention away from the need for a full, careful and objective consideration of that question.""She is concerned that nothing should be allowed to deflect attention away from the need for a full, careful and objective consideration of that question."
A Metropolitan Police spokesman said: "No officer would ever wish to have to shoot someone during the course of their duty, but they are prepared to take the most appropriate action where necessary to protect the public and their colleagues.A Metropolitan Police spokesman said: "No officer would ever wish to have to shoot someone during the course of their duty, but they are prepared to take the most appropriate action where necessary to protect the public and their colleagues.
"Any loss of life, no matter what the circumstances, is a tragedy. Our thoughts remain with the family of Mr Saunders.""Any loss of life, no matter what the circumstances, is a tragedy. Our thoughts remain with the family of Mr Saunders."
He added: "Any officer who discharges a firearm does so in the full knowledge that they will be held fully accountable for their actions through independent investigation and legal scrutiny. They would not seek to have this any other way."He added: "Any officer who discharges a firearm does so in the full knowledge that they will be held fully accountable for their actions through independent investigation and legal scrutiny. They would not seek to have this any other way."
The siege led to a High Court challenge which paved the way for significant changes to the police practice of pooling notes after firearms incidents.The siege led to a High Court challenge which paved the way for significant changes to the police practice of pooling notes after firearms incidents.