This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/world/americas/6333707.stm

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Congress debates Iraq troop plan Republicans block Iraq war debate
(40 minutes later)
Senators in the US Congress are debating a resolution opposing President George W Bush's plan to send thousands of extra troops to Iraq. A resolution opposing President George W Bush's decision to send extra troops to Iraq has failed to advance in the US Senate, dealing a blow to war critics.
The non-binding resolution calls on the White House to examine all alternatives for improving security in Iraq. The measure needed 60 votes before the 100-member Senate could begin debate, but it got 49, with 47 voting against.
Although non-binding, it was the first serious effort in Congress to confront the White House over the war in Iraq.
Since the US-led invasion in 2003, more than 3,000 US troops and tens of thousands of Iraqis have been killed.
The resolution opposed Mr Bush's plan to send 21,500 additional troops to Iraq, the majority of them to violence-hit Baghdad in an effort to end sectarian clashes.
It called on the White House to examine all other possibilities. Mr Bush has said it is something he has already done.
It was the first time Democrats had scheduled a fully-fledged debate on the Iraq war since they won control of Congress in last year's mid-term elections.
'Uncertain fate'
The text of the bipartisan, non-binding resolution was proposed by senior Republican John Warner and it is unclear what will happen to the measure now.
Almost $700bn of the 2008 budget is earmarked for military spendingGroups from the left and the right proposed amendments up to the last minute, as senators tried to balance criticism of the Bush administration with loyalty to US troops in Iraq.
Several Republicans supported the resolution, but there were not enough to block the efforts of White House loyalists in the Senate to prevent it from coming to a vote.
Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell described the vote as "a bump in the road" and added that GOP lawmakers "welcome the debate and are happy to have it".
Some Democrats said they would oppose the resolution because it did not go far enough.
Earlier, Mr Bush sent his budget plan to the Democrat-controlled Congress for approval, requesting extra funding for the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.Earlier, Mr Bush sent his budget plan to the Democrat-controlled Congress for approval, requesting extra funding for the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Almost $700bn (£357bn) is earmarked for new military spending.Almost $700bn (£357bn) is earmarked for new military spending.
The Democratic majority leader, Senator Harry Reid, said that the budget, which also proposes large health care cuts, was not in tune with the needs of ordinary Americans.The Democratic majority leader, Senator Harry Reid, said that the budget, which also proposes large health care cuts, was not in tune with the needs of ordinary Americans.
'Uncertain fate'
The BBC's James Coomarasamy in Washington says Monday's events are the first formal steps by Congress towards confronting the White House over its handling of the war in Iraq.
Almost $700bn of the 2008 budget is earmarked for military spendingThe text of the bipartisan, non-binding resolution - proposed by senior Republican John Warner - was agreed upon after more than a week of political manoeuvring.
Groups from the left and the right were proposing amendments up to the last minute, as senators tried to balance criticism of the Bush administration with loyalty to US troops in Iraq.
The resolution opposes Mr Bush's plan to send 21,500 additional troops to Iraq, the majority of them to violence-hit Baghdad in an effort to improve security and end sectarian clashes.
It calls on the White House to examine all other possibilities. Mr Bush says this is something he has already done.
Several Republicans are supporting the resolution, but it is not clear whether there are enough of them to block the efforts of White House loyalists in the Senate to prevent it from coming to a vote, our correspondent says.
A handful of Democrats may oppose the resolution because it does not go far enough.