This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk/8270092.stm

The article has changed 36 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 22 Version 23
Brown move to cut UK nuclear subs Brown move to cut UK nuclear subs
(30 minutes later)
The prime minister is to tell the United Nations that he is willing to cut the UK's fleet of Trident missile-carrying submarines from four to three.The prime minister is to tell the United Nations that he is willing to cut the UK's fleet of Trident missile-carrying submarines from four to three.
Gordon Brown will make the offer at a meeting of the UN Security Council on halting the spread of nuclear weapons and reducing existing stockpiles.Gordon Brown will make the offer at a meeting of the UN Security Council on halting the spread of nuclear weapons and reducing existing stockpiles.
The proposed cuts come as the government searches for ways to reduce the massive deficit in public finances.The proposed cuts come as the government searches for ways to reduce the massive deficit in public finances.
However Number 10 said keeping the UK's nuclear missiles was "non-negotiable".However Number 10 said keeping the UK's nuclear missiles was "non-negotiable".
At the UN meeting, Mr Brown will call for all nations to come together to achieve the long-term ambition of a nuclear-free world.At the UN meeting, Mr Brown will call for all nations to come together to achieve the long-term ambition of a nuclear-free world.
Nuclear warheadsNuclear warheads
He will say: "If we are serious about the ambition of a nuclear-free world we will need statesmanship, not brinkmanship."He will say: "If we are serious about the ambition of a nuclear-free world we will need statesmanship, not brinkmanship."
BBC defence correspondent Nick Childs said Mr Brown would hope it will be seen as an important gesture in a much bigger global disarmament deal, but the key to the process would be the actions of the United States and Russia.
David Miliband: "The long-term aim is a world free of nuclear weapons"
US President Barack Obama is chairing the meeting as part of the process of drawing up a replacement for the Non-Proliferation Treaty, designed to stop countries developing nuclear weapons.US President Barack Obama is chairing the meeting as part of the process of drawing up a replacement for the Non-Proliferation Treaty, designed to stop countries developing nuclear weapons.
David Miliband: "The long-term aim is a world free of nuclear weapons"
He has said he will try to negotiate with Moscow to reduce US and Russian nuclear warheads - which make up the vast majority of the world's total - from more than 2,000 each to 1,500.He has said he will try to negotiate with Moscow to reduce US and Russian nuclear warheads - which make up the vast majority of the world's total - from more than 2,000 each to 1,500.
The UK government says it has cut its stockpile of Trident warheads from 200 to 160 but many Labour MPs would like it to scrap the weapons altogether.The UK government says it has cut its stockpile of Trident warheads from 200 to 160 but many Labour MPs would like it to scrap the weapons altogether.
But the Liberal Democrats are the only party to say they would not seek a "like-for-like replacement" for Trident - which is due to need replacing by 2024.But the Liberal Democrats are the only party to say they would not seek a "like-for-like replacement" for Trident - which is due to need replacing by 2024.
The four Vanguard submarines which host Trident missiles can attack targets within a range of just over 4,600 miles (7,400km). The example above shows this range if the sub were located in the mid-Atlantic.Britain keeps at least one submarine armed and at sea at all times. Normally, the remaining three - or two, should one be scrapped - will be undergoing maintenance, taking part in training exercises, or docked at port. 'Spare' submarine
Officials travelling with the prime minister warned that reducing the number of submarines, which are based at Faslane on the Clyde, from four to three would not result in a 25% cut in cost.
The government estimates the cost of renewing Trident at about £20bn but Greenpeace says it could cost £34bn and, once lifetime running costs are included, would cost nearly £100bn in total.The government estimates the cost of renewing Trident at about £20bn but Greenpeace says it could cost £34bn and, once lifetime running costs are included, would cost nearly £100bn in total.
Professor Ron Smith, a defence economist at Birkbeck College, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that going from four to three submarines would probably have little effect on Britain's nuclear capability. Professor Ron Smith, a defence economist at Birkbeck College, told the BBC that going from four to three submarines would probably have little effect on Britain's nuclear capability.
The important thing is we maintain our nuclear deterrent and maintain our at sea deterrent at all times Liam FoxConservatives Send us your comments The four Vanguard submarines which host Trident missiles can attack targets within a range of just over 4,600 miles (7,400km). The example above shows this range if the sub were located in the mid-Atlantic.Britain keeps at least one submarine armed and at sea at all times. Normally, the remaining three - or two, should one be scrapped - will be undergoing maintenance, taking part in training exercises, or docked at port. Send us your comments
"The idea of having four of them is essentially you have got one spare as insurance," he said."The idea of having four of them is essentially you have got one spare as insurance," he said.
He added that the cost of replacing Trident was "very unclear" but working on the £20bn estimate, losing one submarine would only save "a couple of billion" in about 2020 as there were a lot of fixed costs upfront and each boat cost less to build than the last one.He added that the cost of replacing Trident was "very unclear" but working on the £20bn estimate, losing one submarine would only save "a couple of billion" in about 2020 as there were a lot of fixed costs upfront and each boat cost less to build than the last one.
Downing Street says maintaining an independent nuclear weapon system is "non-negotiable".Downing Street says maintaining an independent nuclear weapon system is "non-negotiable".
At-sea patrolsAt-sea patrols
Foreign Secretary David Miliband added: "We reject unilateral nuclear disarmament for ourselves precisely because the world cannot end up in a situation where responsible powers get rid of their weapons, but the danger of nuclear proliferation by other powers remains."Foreign Secretary David Miliband added: "We reject unilateral nuclear disarmament for ourselves precisely because the world cannot end up in a situation where responsible powers get rid of their weapons, but the danger of nuclear proliferation by other powers remains."
But the former defence secretary John Hutton, in whose Barrow and Furness constituency the submarines are built, said it was "very very important" that Britain could have "absolute confidence and the knowledge that we can maintain one of those submarines - at least one of those submarines - on continuous deterrent patrol".
We should only proceed on that basis if we are absolutely sure that three boats gives us the confidence of having an ability to maintain a continuous deterrent patrol John HuttonFormer defence secretary
"You have got to have cover all the time every single day of the year and that's what a continuous at-sea deterrent is about and we have not found a way of doing that with less than four boats - and no other Navy has either," he told the BBC.
"We should only proceed on that basis if we are absolutely sure that three boats gives us the confidence of having an ability to maintain a continuous deterrent patrol."
Shadow defence secretary Liam Fox said reducing the number of submarines was not a new idea as it was an option set out in the government's 2006 White Paper.Shadow defence secretary Liam Fox said reducing the number of submarines was not a new idea as it was an option set out in the government's 2006 White Paper.
'Tinkering'
He told the BBC: "If we can maintain our nuclear deterrent and make a contribution to disarmament that's all very well but the prime minister is not planning to reduce the number of warheads from 160 ... merely to have them in fewer submarines."He told the BBC: "If we can maintain our nuclear deterrent and make a contribution to disarmament that's all very well but the prime minister is not planning to reduce the number of warheads from 160 ... merely to have them in fewer submarines."
He said it was "reasonable and sensible" to look at doing that if the technology was available to make it possible.He said it was "reasonable and sensible" to look at doing that if the technology was available to make it possible.
"The important thing is we maintain our nuclear deterrent and maintain our at sea deterrent at all times.""The important thing is we maintain our nuclear deterrent and maintain our at sea deterrent at all times."
Moving from four subs to three frankly looks like tinkering at the edges Edward DaveyLiberal Democrats
Leader Nick Clegg said it was good the prime minister had acknowledged the need for alternatives to a "like-for-like" replacement but he might have to go "a lot further".Leader Nick Clegg said it was good the prime minister had acknowledged the need for alternatives to a "like-for-like" replacement but he might have to go "a lot further".
However asked if it was welcome news, the party's foreign affairs spokesman Edward Davey told the BBC: "Not really.However asked if it was welcome news, the party's foreign affairs spokesman Edward Davey told the BBC: "Not really.
"In the context of next year's global disarmament conference when we are seeing America and Russia pledging to massive cuts in their nuclear stockpiles and people even talking about a timetable, a plan to get rid of nuclear weapons altogether, moving from four subs to three frankly looks like tinkering at the edges.""In the context of next year's global disarmament conference when we are seeing America and Russia pledging to massive cuts in their nuclear stockpiles and people even talking about a timetable, a plan to get rid of nuclear weapons altogether, moving from four subs to three frankly looks like tinkering at the edges."
Kate Hudson, chairwoman of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND), said the proposals were "a serious and positive first step towards the scrapping of both the current Trident nuclear weapons system and its replacement".Kate Hudson, chairwoman of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND), said the proposals were "a serious and positive first step towards the scrapping of both the current Trident nuclear weapons system and its replacement".
But she said the ultimate goal should be total disarmament.But she said the ultimate goal should be total disarmament.
All numbers are estimates because exact numbers are top secret. Strategic nuclear warheads are designed to target cities, missile locations and military headquarters as part of a strategic plan. Israel Israeli authorities have never confirmed or denied the country has nuclear weapons. North Korea The highly secretive state claims it has nuclear weapons, but there is no information in the public domain that proves this. Iran The International Atomic Energy Agency reported in 2003 there had been covert nuclear activity to make fissile material and continues to monitor Tehran's nuclear program. Syria US officials have claimed it is covertly seeking nuclear weapons.All numbers are estimates because exact numbers are top secret. Strategic nuclear warheads are designed to target cities, missile locations and military headquarters as part of a strategic plan. Israel Israeli authorities have never confirmed or denied the country has nuclear weapons. North Korea The highly secretive state claims it has nuclear weapons, but there is no information in the public domain that proves this. Iran The International Atomic Energy Agency reported in 2003 there had been covert nuclear activity to make fissile material and continues to monitor Tehran's nuclear program. Syria US officials have claimed it is covertly seeking nuclear weapons.