This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/technology/8269278.stm

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Intel shows chips can get thinner Intel shows chips can get smaller
(about 3 hours later)
Intel has unveiled a new microchip that shows less can be more.Intel has unveiled a new microchip that shows less can be more.
One of the world's largest makers of processors has produced what is thought to be the first working version of a 22 nanometer SRAM chip. One of the world's largest makers of processors has produced what is thought to be the first working version of a 22 nanometre SRAM chip.
Some industry experts were surprised, saying they did not think chips could get any thinner. Some industry experts were surprised, saying they did not think chips could get any smaller.
The chip contains nearly three billion transistors packed into an area the size of a fingernail but Intel says there could be smaller to come. The chip contains nearly three billion transistors packed into an area the size of a fingernail, but Intel says there could be smaller to come.
The development shows there is still life in Moore's Law, which states the number of transistors on a silicon chip will double every two years.The development shows there is still life in Moore's Law, which states the number of transistors on a silicon chip will double every two years.
Generally speaking the smaller the chip's geometry, the faster and more power efficient the chip.Generally speaking the smaller the chip's geometry, the faster and more power efficient the chip.
"Moore's Law is not a law of physics, it's a law of human inventiveness," Intel president and chief executive Paul Otellini told BBC News."Moore's Law is not a law of physics, it's a law of human inventiveness," Intel president and chief executive Paul Otellini told BBC News.
"There is nothing that says that humans can't continue to invent.""There is nothing that says that humans can't continue to invent."
Intel is currently making chips based on 45 nanometer technology and will move to 32 nanometer later this year. Intel is currently making chips based on 45 nanometre technology and will move to 32 nanometre later this year.
The company's first chips in the 1970s had just a few thousand transistors.The company's first chips in the 1970s had just a few thousand transistors.
IBM and a European project called Duallogic are also involved in creating 22 nanometer chips. IBM and a European project called Duallogic are also involved in creating 22 nanometre chips.
'Vision''Vision'
Mr Otellini displayed the silicon wafer during his keynote speech at the firm's developer conference in San Francisco.Mr Otellini displayed the silicon wafer during his keynote speech at the firm's developer conference in San Francisco.
He revealed that it contained 364 million bits of memory and has more than 2.9 billion transistors. It is expected to go into production in 2011.He revealed that it contained 364 million bits of memory and has more than 2.9 billion transistors. It is expected to go into production in 2011.
Intel says the 22 nanometer technology will not go into production until 2011 Intel says the 22 nanometre technology will not go into production until 2011
"We have at least four generations of what we are shipping today in development. That is as far out as we have ever been able to develop things."We have at least four generations of what we are shipping today in development. That is as far out as we have ever been able to develop things.
"Not everything is done but it gets harder for sure. It requires more invention and more money and it's our job to continue that pace," said Mr Otellini."Not everything is done but it gets harder for sure. It requires more invention and more money and it's our job to continue that pace," said Mr Otellini.
Those attending Intel Developer Forum, IDF, were impressed by what they saw.Those attending Intel Developer Forum, IDF, were impressed by what they saw.
"I believe we are always going to be able to improve on Moore's Law," said Professor Tom Murphy from Contra Costa College."I believe we are always going to be able to improve on Moore's Law," said Professor Tom Murphy from Contra Costa College.
"It's always delightful to see the vision of what Intel is planning because it translates to the toys I will get to play with real soon.""It's always delightful to see the vision of what Intel is planning because it translates to the toys I will get to play with real soon."
Haider Sabri from techSpeak said: "I was starting to have doubts that Moore's Law was valid anymore, but thankfully I have been proven wrong today."Haider Sabri from techSpeak said: "I was starting to have doubts that Moore's Law was valid anymore, but thankfully I have been proven wrong today."
Meanwhile Matthew Wolf, a research scientist from Georgia Tech, said he could not help thinking the end for Moore's Law had to come eventually.Meanwhile Matthew Wolf, a research scientist from Georgia Tech, said he could not help thinking the end for Moore's Law had to come eventually.
"I am coming at this as a physicist and it just had to end sometime. But I think that the trajectory for the next few years is clearly one that is real and on its way," said Mr Wolf."I am coming at this as a physicist and it just had to end sometime. But I think that the trajectory for the next few years is clearly one that is real and on its way," said Mr Wolf.
MarketplaceMarketplace
During his speech, Mr Otellini also predicted that the worldwide personal computer market was due for a resurgence and could actually defy predictions by growing this year.During his speech, Mr Otellini also predicted that the worldwide personal computer market was due for a resurgence and could actually defy predictions by growing this year.
Around 5,000 developers are attending Intel's annual developer forumAround 5,000 developers are attending Intel's annual developer forum
"In general, technology was the first into the recession and is likely to be the first out. We have seen this in past recessions and so far the pattern seems to be holding to that."In general, technology was the first into the recession and is likely to be the first out. We have seen this in past recessions and so far the pattern seems to be holding to that.
"The computer has become so indispensable that if it breaks you don't wait for the recession to buy a new one. You are going to go out and get another because it is simply a part of your life," said Mr Otellini."The computer has become so indispensable that if it breaks you don't wait for the recession to buy a new one. You are going to go out and get another because it is simply a part of your life," said Mr Otellini.
The optimism displayed by Intel's boss goes against the grain given recent studies done by research companies IDC and Gartner.The optimism displayed by Intel's boss goes against the grain given recent studies done by research companies IDC and Gartner.
Both have predicted that PC shipments will decline year-over-year in 2009, representing the first drop since 2001.Both have predicted that PC shipments will decline year-over-year in 2009, representing the first drop since 2001.
Researchers at Gartner point to a 2% decline this year, which is an improvement on the 6% drop the company was projecting a few months ago.Researchers at Gartner point to a 2% decline this year, which is an improvement on the 6% drop the company was projecting a few months ago.
"Things are looking much better in the second half," Gartner research director George Shiffler told Cnet.com."Things are looking much better in the second half," Gartner research director George Shiffler told Cnet.com.
"It wouldn't surprise me if we did see positive growth, but that's not our call at the moment. I think that's more of a best-case scenario," said Mr Shiffler."It wouldn't surprise me if we did see positive growth, but that's not our call at the moment. I think that's more of a best-case scenario," said Mr Shiffler.