This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk_politics/8274041.stm

The article has changed 12 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Expenses mole angry over Army kit Expenses mole angry over Army kit
(42 minutes later)
The expenses scandal began because the mole who caused the leak was angry about inadequate equipment for the armed forces, the Daily Telegraph said.The expenses scandal began because the mole who caused the leak was angry about inadequate equipment for the armed forces, the Daily Telegraph said.
The newspaper says staff who worked in secrecy processing the MPs' receipts were guarded by moonlighting servicemen on leave between tours.The newspaper says staff who worked in secrecy processing the MPs' receipts were guarded by moonlighting servicemen on leave between tours.
They became angry when they learned of MPs' lavish claims when soldiers had inadequate equipment, the paper says.They became angry when they learned of MPs' lavish claims when soldiers had inadequate equipment, the paper says.
Many servicemen were working so they could buy better kit, the paper adds.Many servicemen were working so they could buy better kit, the paper adds.
Tipping pointTipping point
The unidentified mole is quoted as saying the soldiers' accounts of their poor equipment prompted him to leak the information.The unidentified mole is quoted as saying the soldiers' accounts of their poor equipment prompted him to leak the information.
The paper quotes the mole as saying: "It's not easy to watch footage on the television news of a coffin draped in a Union Jack and then come in to work the next day and see on your computer screen what MPs are taking for themselves."The paper quotes the mole as saying: "It's not easy to watch footage on the television news of a coffin draped in a Union Jack and then come in to work the next day and see on your computer screen what MPs are taking for themselves."
The stark contrast between conditions facing soldiers and the MPs' lavish claims "helped tip the balance in the decision over whether I should or should not leak the expenses data," the mole is quoted as saying.The stark contrast between conditions facing soldiers and the MPs' lavish claims "helped tip the balance in the decision over whether I should or should not leak the expenses data," the mole is quoted as saying.
That was why I leaked the information: because the British public deserves better MPs' expenses moleThat was why I leaked the information: because the British public deserves better MPs' expenses mole
"When they're out in Afghanistan they're out there for Queen and country, earning £16,000 or £17,000-a-year, knowing they're going to take losses, while the MPs are sitting in Parliament on £65,000, with massive expenses, and meanwhile you've got bodies coming home.""When they're out in Afghanistan they're out there for Queen and country, earning £16,000 or £17,000-a-year, knowing they're going to take losses, while the MPs are sitting in Parliament on £65,000, with massive expenses, and meanwhile you've got bodies coming home."
The mole said everyone working on the MPs' expenses claims were "of the same mind".The mole said everyone working on the MPs' expenses claims were "of the same mind".
"This was our money and these were our employees, effectively, but no-one could hold them to account."This was our money and these were our employees, effectively, but no-one could hold them to account.
Mole hunt called off
"That was why I leaked the information: because the British public deserves better," the mole is quoted as saying."That was why I leaked the information: because the British public deserves better," the mole is quoted as saying.
The newspaper says that about 20 Her Majesty's Stationery Office and parliamentary staff worked for months in great secrecy in a south London office copying and processing the MPs' receipts.
The BBC's political correspondent Ben Wright said although there was originally a hunt to find the mole when the scandal broke, it was unsuccessful and has since been called off.
Our correspondent said: "Parliament has moved a very long way since then. It has claimed so many careers, it has prompted a massive overhaul of the parliamentary expenses system."
The claims are made in a book being published by the Daily Telegraph on Friday about the expenses scandal called No Expenses Spared.The claims are made in a book being published by the Daily Telegraph on Friday about the expenses scandal called No Expenses Spared.