This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk/8289949.stm

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Supreme Court to hear terror case Supreme Court to hear terror case
(about 6 hours later)
The new UK Supreme Court is to hear its first case as five men suspected of financing terrorism challenge the freezing of their assets.The new UK Supreme Court is to hear its first case as five men suspected of financing terrorism challenge the freezing of their assets.
The suspects - who cannot be named for legal reasons - claim the measure is unfair and breaches their human rights.The suspects - who cannot be named for legal reasons - claim the measure is unfair and breaches their human rights.
The case was chosen as it deals with human rights and anti-terrorism powers.The case was chosen as it deals with human rights and anti-terrorism powers.
The court has taken over from the Law Lords as the final court of appeal for UK civil cases and criminal cases in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.The court has taken over from the Law Lords as the final court of appeal for UK civil cases and criminal cases in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.
The five suspects at the centre of the case have not been convicted of funding terrorism.The five suspects at the centre of the case have not been convicted of funding terrorism.
But the Treasury has blocked access to their bank accounts, welfare benefits and other assets.But the Treasury has blocked access to their bank accounts, welfare benefits and other assets.
Ministers argue that those powers were legitimised by adopting UN Security Council resolutions that were intended to tackle terrorism.Ministers argue that those powers were legitimised by adopting UN Security Council resolutions that were intended to tackle terrorism.
The asset-freezing powers were introduced in 2006 - but were never scrutinised or approved by Parliament, which the mens' lawyers say is unlawful. The asset-freezing powers were introduced in 2006 - but were never scrutinised or approved by Parliament, which the men's lawyers say is unlawful.
The suspects are given only a small amount to meet basic expenses and have to account for what they spend.The suspects are given only a small amount to meet basic expenses and have to account for what they spend.
The £59m Supreme Court is based at Middlesex Guildhall in central London.The £59m Supreme Court is based at Middlesex Guildhall in central London.
The court's creation was intended to make the judiciary independent of Parliament by ending the House of Lord's judicial role. The court's creation was intended to make the judiciary independent of Parliament by ending the House of Lords' judicial role.