This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-68889345

The article has changed 12 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 6 Version 7
Labour pledges to renationalise most rail services within five years Labour pledges to renationalise most rail services within five years
(about 2 hours later)
Labour says it expects to renationalise most passenger rail services within five years, if it is elected. Labour has promised to renationalise nearly all passenger rail services within five years if it wins the next election.
The party says it will meet the pledge by bringing passenger services into public control as the contracts expire - but there will still be a role for the private sector. It says a new public body would inherit existing contracts when they expire, taking on responsibility for running services.
Automatic refunds for train delays and improved internet connections are among a series of other railway pledges. It is also promising automatic refunds for train delays, and better internet connection on trains.
Rail Minister Huw Merriman said the plans were "pointless" and "unfunded". But Rail Minister Huw Merriman said the plans were "pointless" and "unfunded".
"They don't have a plan to pay for the bill attached to their rail nationalisation," he said. He said Labour doesn't have a "plan to pay for the bill attached to their rail nationalisation", arguing it would eventually lead to tax rises.
"Without a plan to pay for this, it means one thing: taxes will rise on hard working people."
Great British Railways transport bill shelvedGreat British Railways transport bill shelved
Rail strikes announced for May Bank Holiday weekRail strikes announced for May Bank Holiday week
Minister gives reassurance over railways HQMinister gives reassurance over railways HQ
Responsibility for running train services was handed to private companies during the 1990s, since when there has been a boom in rail usage since the days of British Rail.
But they have faced heavy criticism over fares and reliability, with critics saying it has led to an inefficient and fragmented system that has failed passengers.
The word "nationalisation" doesn't appear in Labour's plan, but that is what it in effect amounts to.The word "nationalisation" doesn't appear in Labour's plan, but that is what it in effect amounts to.
Private train companies have overseen a boom in rail usage since the days of British Rail, but they have also faced heavy criticism over fares and reliability. Under its blueprint, a new arm's length body, Great British Railways (GBR), would take over service contracts currently held by private firms as they expire in the coming years.
Shadow transport secretary Louise Haigh said there would still be a role for the private sector, adding that her party were not "ideologues" and that it was right to use private companies, where they add value. GBR would operate services and set timetables, and eventually take over responsibility for maintaining and improving rail infrastructure from Network Rail.
'Transparent and clearer'
But the party says GBR, like private companies now, would continue to lease rolling stock because it would not be "responsible" to take on the cost of buying it.
Labour is also not planning to nationalise rail freight companies, and would still allow privately financed "open access operators", such as Hull Trains and Lumo, to continue.
Shadow transport secretary Louise Haigh said her party were not "ideologues" and that it was right to use private companies where they add value.
But she said the current system "was not working" and had led to delays and overcrowding.But she said the current system "was not working" and had led to delays and overcrowding.
Labour is also pledging to deliver automatic refunds for delayed and cancelled journeys, better internet connection on trains and "a best-price ticket guarantee" ensuring passengers automatically pay the lowest possible amount for tickets when making contactless payments. Labour is also pledging to deliver "a best-price ticket guarantee" ensuring passengers automatically pay the lowest possible amount for tickets when making contactless payments.
Ms Haigh said the guarantee would not necessarily mean cheaper prices but that the system would be "more transparent and clearer". The government has also said it wants to simplify ticketing. Ms Haigh said the guarantee would not necessarily mean cheaper prices, but that the system would be "more transparent and clearer". The government has also said it wants to simplify ticketing.
She also said Labour had no plans to close ticket offices.She also said Labour had no plans to close ticket offices.
What will Labour change? Covid shock
Labour wants to bring services together under a body called Great British Railways, saying it would improve passengers' experience. The government promised to set up a new public sector body in 2021, also named Great British Railways,which would be responsible for rail infrastructure and awarding contracts to private companies.
The government promised to set up a new public sector body in 2021, with the same name, which would be responsible for rail infrastructure and awarding contracts to private companies.
The plans have been delayed and although a draft bill to implement the proposal has now been published, it is unlikely to become law before the general election expected this year.The plans have been delayed and although a draft bill to implement the proposal has now been published, it is unlikely to become law before the general election expected this year.
During the pandemic, the government in effect took control of the railway, with most train companies in England moving onto contracts where they get a fixed fee to run services, and the taxpayer carries the financial risk.During the pandemic, the government in effect took control of the railway, with most train companies in England moving onto contracts where they get a fixed fee to run services, and the taxpayer carries the financial risk.
Four major operators, including TransPennine Express, have also been taken under public control and are being run by the government's Operator of Last Resort model.Four major operators, including TransPennine Express, have also been taken under public control and are being run by the government's Operator of Last Resort model.
Labour says the move to bring services back into public control would not cost the taxpayer "a penny in compensation costs", and that "significant" savings can be made through public ownership including by reducing friction between operators and having less duplication of resources. Labour says there would be no cost associated with renationalising rail contracts, as they would not be terminated early.
It also argues that in the longer term, the greater efficiency of its rail system could save taxpayers "as much as £2.2bn".
It says the government estimated in the 2021 reform plan that it could save £1.5bn annually after five years by ending inefficiency and fragmentation.It says the government estimated in the 2021 reform plan that it could save £1.5bn annually after five years by ending inefficiency and fragmentation.
Labour is also not planning to nationalise rail freight companies or rolling stock companies. The party says GBR would be "operationally independent" - although the transport department would have to agree to the biggest changes to services and infrastructure.
It would still allow privately financed "Open Access operators", such as Hull Trains and Lumo, to continue. It plans to set up a new watchdog - the Passenger Standards Authority - to "mercilessly" hold GBR to account.
Open Access operators currently run a relatively very small proportion of services. They run independently of government funding and are often in competition with franchised operators.
She said a new watchdog - the Passenger Standards Authority - would "mercilessly" hold Great British Railways to account.
Asked how soon passengers would see the improvements to services Labour claim would result from taking train companies into its version of GBR, Ms Haigh said: "We know there are no quick fixes and we're not going to see enormous change overnight. It will take time to legislate and put the structural changes in place."Asked how soon passengers would see the improvements to services Labour claim would result from taking train companies into its version of GBR, Ms Haigh said: "We know there are no quick fixes and we're not going to see enormous change overnight. It will take time to legislate and put the structural changes in place."
Labour's shadow transport secretary Louise Haigh said there would be no "quick fixes"Labour's shadow transport secretary Louise Haigh said there would be no "quick fixes"
Asked how Labour would try to resolve the ongoing pay dispute with the train drivers' union Aslef, she said they would "sit down and work out" an answer, pointing out the transport secretary had not met the union since early last year.Asked how Labour would try to resolve the ongoing pay dispute with the train drivers' union Aslef, she said they would "sit down and work out" an answer, pointing out the transport secretary had not met the union since early last year.
She told the BBC her party would "always want to modernise the railways and working practices", but this needed to be "done in partnership with the workforce and not treating them as an enemy". She said Labour would not be separating reforms from the negotiations.She told the BBC her party would "always want to modernise the railways and working practices", but this needed to be "done in partnership with the workforce and not treating them as an enemy". She said Labour would not be separating reforms from the negotiations.
She did not say whether Labour would increase the pay offer on the table.She did not say whether Labour would increase the pay offer on the table.
Andy Bagnall, chief executive of Rail Partners, which represents train companies, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme while he agreed there was a need for "radical change", nationalisation was not the way to achieve it.Andy Bagnall, chief executive of Rail Partners, which represents train companies, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme while he agreed there was a need for "radical change", nationalisation was not the way to achieve it.
He said the "best of both worlds" was to have Great British Railways as a public sector body while harnessing private operators to "attract passengers back and regrow the railway". He said the "best of both worlds" was to have Great British Railways as a public sector body, while harnessing private operators to "attract passengers back and regrow the railway".
This would ensure "the railway takes as little subsidy as possible", he said.This would ensure "the railway takes as little subsidy as possible", he said.
"That's the danger with nationalisation - we believe that without that commercial focus, costs would creep up over time, revenue growth will be slower and the taxpayer is the one that loses out.""That's the danger with nationalisation - we believe that without that commercial focus, costs would creep up over time, revenue growth will be slower and the taxpayer is the one that loses out."
Liberal Democrat transport spokesperson Wera Hobhouse said the Conservatives had "left commuters paying higher prices for poor services and endless disruption".Liberal Democrat transport spokesperson Wera Hobhouse said the Conservatives had "left commuters paying higher prices for poor services and endless disruption".
"The Liberal Democrats want a plan which puts commuters first by establishing the Great British Railway body after years of the government dithering.""The Liberal Democrats want a plan which puts commuters first by establishing the Great British Railway body after years of the government dithering."
RMT general secretary Mick Lynch said Labour's plan to bring train operating companies into a publicly-owned network was "in the best interests of railway workers, passengers and the taxpayer".RMT general secretary Mick Lynch said Labour's plan to bring train operating companies into a publicly-owned network was "in the best interests of railway workers, passengers and the taxpayer".
But the plan "should be a first step to completely integrating all of our railway into public ownership," he added.But the plan "should be a first step to completely integrating all of our railway into public ownership," he added.
Are you affected by the issues in this story? Get in touch.Are you affected by the issues in this story? Get in touch.
Email haveyoursay@bbc.co.ukEmail haveyoursay@bbc.co.uk
WhatsApp: +44 7756 165803WhatsApp: +44 7756 165803
Tweet: @BBC_HaveYourSayTweet: @BBC_HaveYourSay
Upload your pictures or videoUpload your pictures or video
Please read our terms & conditions and privacy policyPlease read our terms & conditions and privacy policy
Related TopicsRelated Topics
Rail travelRail travel
Labour PartyLabour Party