This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/8325377.stm
The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
S Korea clone scientist convicted | S Korea clone scientist convicted |
(about 1 hour later) | |
A South Korean court has convicted the disgraced cloning scientist Hwang Woo-suk of fraud over his stem-cell research. | A South Korean court has convicted the disgraced cloning scientist Hwang Woo-suk of fraud over his stem-cell research. |
The 56-year-old scientist's work had raised hopes of finding cures for diseases such as Alzheimer's. | The 56-year-old scientist's work had raised hopes of finding cures for diseases such as Alzheimer's. |
But his research was declared bogus in 2005 and he was put on trial the following year for embezzlement and accepting money under false pretences. | But his research was declared bogus in 2005 and he was put on trial the following year for embezzlement and accepting money under false pretences. |
Following his three-year trial, he will be sentenced at a later hearing. | Following his three-year trial, he will be sentenced at a later hearing. |
Hwang's research made him a South Korean hero until revelations that it was fabricated shocked the nation. | |
"He was guilty of fabrication," the Seoul court said, adding that Hwang illegally diverted a portion of the money he received for research for his personal use. | |
Prosecutors have demanded a four-year prison term; sentencing was reportedly due to take place later on Monday at Seoul Central District Court. | |
Awe, then shock | |
Once his colleagues at Seoul National University had concluded Hwang's work had been "intentionally fabricated", Hwang resigned and apologised. | |
"I sincerely apologise to the people for creating shock and disappointment," he said, after his fall from grace in 2005. | |
However he maintained that the science behind his work was sound, and that his country's scientists were still leading the field. | |
"I emphasise that patient-specific stem cells belong to South Korea and you are going to see this," he said. | |
The controversy caused shockwaves in South Korea, where the cloning pioneer was once widely considered a national hero. | |
However, Hwang and his team claimed to have created the world's first dog clone in 2005, an achievement which was independently confirmed. | |
Since 2002, he received $40m (£23m) in grants from the science and technology ministry alone. | |
SCANDAL TIMELINE Feb 2004 Hwang Woo-suk's team declare they have created 30 cloned human embryosMay 2005 Team says it has made stem cell lines from skin cells of 11 peopleNov 2005 Hwang apologises for using eggs from his own researchersDec 15 A colleague claims stem cell research was fakedDec 23 Academic panel finds results were 'intentionally fabricated' Profile: Hwang Woo-suk | |
In May 2005, Hwang had published a paper in the journal Science, saying his team had extracted material from cloned human embryos that identically matched the DNA of 11 patients. | |
It was claimed such a technique could be the key to providing personalised cures. | |
But an investigating university panel said that all 11 sets of data were derived from only two stem cell lines. | |
The panel said it still did not know whether those two stem cell clusters had actually been cloned. | |
"Based on these findings, data in the 2005 Science journal cannot be regarded as a simple accidental error but as intentional fabrication made out of two stem cells," the investigators said. | |
"This is a serious wrongdoing that has damaged the foundation of science," it said. | |
Scandal had earlier erupted when Hwang was forced to step down as chairman of South Korea's World Stem Cell Hub, after admitting that eggs for research were donated by his own female colleagues, in breach of guidelines. | |
The South Korean government stripped him of the license to carry out stem cell research in 2006, citing "ethical problems". |