This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/10/alec-baldwin-rust-shooting-trial-begins

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Alec Baldwin’s manslaughter trial for Rust film set shooting begins in New Mexico Rust trial prosecutors say Alec Baldwin violated ‘cardinal rules of firearm safety’
(about 3 hours later)
The actor is being tried for his role in the death of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins in 2021 Actor charged with involuntary manslaughter over 2021 death of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on film set
Almost three years after the fatal shooting on the movie set of Rust, prosecutors will begin to lay out their case against Alec Baldwin as the actor’s involuntary manslaughter trial starts. Almost three years after the fatal shooting on the movie set of Rust, prosecutors began to lay out their case against Alec Baldwin in a packed Santa Fe courtroom, painting a picture of an unsafe workplace on a tight budget with a lead actor who violated the “cardinal rules of firearm safety”.
The proceedings were expected to kick off on Wednesday with the prosecution and defense offering their opening statements. Proceedings in the actor’s involuntary manslaughter trial kicked off on Wednesday with the prosecution and defense offering their opening statements. The courtroom was filled to capacity with dozens of media as well as Baldwin’s wife and brother, who sat just behind the actor.
Baldwin is accused of involuntary manslaughter for his role in the death of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins, who was killed on the film’s New Mexico set in October 2021. The actor and producer on the western was rehearsing when he pointed a prop firearm at Hutchins and the weapon fired a single bullet, killing Hutchins and injuring director Joel Souza. The state said Baldwin acted in a reckless manner that led to the death of the cinematographer Halyna Hutchins, who was killed on the film’s set at the Bonanza Creek Ranch, a popular filming location 30 minutes outside the city, in October 2021.
The trial will focus extensively on the Colt .45 used in the shooting. Baldwin has long claimed that he did not fire the weapon and that it had malfunctioned. The prosecution contends that forensic testing on the gun shows the actor had pulled the trigger and that Baldwin was negligent in his handling of it. The actor and co-producer on the western was rehearsing when he pointed a prop firearm at Hutchins and the weapon fired a single bullet, killing Hutchins and injuring the director, Joel Souza.
The evidence will show the gun was functional, prosecutor Erlinda Johnson said, despite Baldwin’s statements that it had malfunctioned. But Baldwin failed to do a safety check and repeatedly violated set safety rules with the weapon by leaving his finger on the hammer and trigger, and pointing it at people on set while filming, she argued.
“That gun the defendant had asked to be assigned worked perfectly fine, as it was designed,” Johnson said. “He pointed the gun at another human being, cocked the gun and pulled that trigger in reckless disregard for Ms Hutchins’ safety.”
The trial will focus extensively on the Colt .45 used in the shooting. Baldwin has long claimed that he did not fire the weapon. The prosecution contends that forensic testing on the gun shows the actor had pulled the trigger and that Baldwin was negligent in his handling of it.
The defense argued in opening statements that Baldwin was focused on playing a character and was not responsible for checking the gun. Others on set were tasked with ensuring the weapon’s safety, defense attorney Alex Spiro said, namely the film’s armorer and first assistant director.
The most critical issue in the case is how a real bullet got on the film set, he said.
“The evidence will show that on a movie set, safety has to occur before the gun is placed in an actor’s hands,” Spiro said.
“He was just acting as he has done for generations and it was the safety apparatus that failed them all.”
This criminal case against Baldwin has been winding its way through the New Mexico legal system since January 2024, when a grand jury indicted him on a charge of involuntary manslaughter. Prosecutors had previously charged him with the same offense in 2023 but later dropped the charge and said they needed more time to review the evidence.This criminal case against Baldwin has been winding its way through the New Mexico legal system since January 2024, when a grand jury indicted him on a charge of involuntary manslaughter. Prosecutors had previously charged him with the same offense in 2023 but later dropped the charge and said they needed more time to review the evidence.
Baldwin’s legal team had repeatedly attempted to get the charge against him dropped, and last month sought dismissal on grounds that prosecutors had allowed potentially “exculpatory evidence” to be destroyed in the FBI testing of the firearm before the defense could examine it. Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer denied those requests.Baldwin’s legal team had repeatedly attempted to get the charge against him dropped, and last month sought dismissal on grounds that prosecutors had allowed potentially “exculpatory evidence” to be destroyed in the FBI testing of the firearm before the defense could examine it. Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer denied those requests.
On Tuesday, proceedings moved forward as a jury of 11 women and five men were selected from a pool of 70 people. Only three of the 70 potential jurors said they had not seen or heard anything about the case, but all of those selected said that they had not formed an opinion about the incident and that they felt they could be fair. On Tuesday, proceedings moved forward as a jury of 11 women and five men were selected from a pool of 70 people. Only three of the potential jurors said they had not seen or heard anything about the case, but all of those selected said that they had not formed an opinion about the incident and that they felt they could be fair.
“Our job – the attorneys for both sides – is to make sure we get a fair and impartial jury,” prosecutor Kari Morrissey said on Tuesday. “We want to get jurors who can be fair to the state. We also want to get jurors who can be fair to Mr Baldwin.”“Our job – the attorneys for both sides – is to make sure we get a fair and impartial jury,” prosecutor Kari Morrissey said on Tuesday. “We want to get jurors who can be fair to the state. We also want to get jurors who can be fair to Mr Baldwin.”
The trial comes after Hannah Gutierrez-Reed, the chief weapons handler on the Rust set, was convicted of involuntary manslaughter and sentenced to 18 months in prison. Legal experts have said that prosecutors may have a harder time proving Baldwin’s guilt after Gutierrez-Reed was deemed responsible in her trial.The trial comes after Hannah Gutierrez-Reed, the chief weapons handler on the Rust set, was convicted of involuntary manslaughter and sentenced to 18 months in prison. Legal experts have said that prosecutors may have a harder time proving Baldwin’s guilt after Gutierrez-Reed was deemed responsible in her trial.
Read more on the case:Read more on the case:
What you need to know about Alec Baldwin’s trialWhat you need to know about Alec Baldwin’s trial
Alec Baldwin heads to trial for manslaughterAlec Baldwin heads to trial for manslaughter
Rust film armorer sentenced for fatal on-set shootingRust film armorer sentenced for fatal on-set shooting
What you need to know about Alec Baldwin’s trialWhat you need to know about Alec Baldwin’s trial
Alec Baldwin heads to trial for manslaughterAlec Baldwin heads to trial for manslaughter
Rust film armorer sentenced for fatal on-set shootingRust film armorer sentenced for fatal on-set shooting