This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/england/oxfordshire/8339652.stm
The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Eco-employee wins bid to appeal | Eco-employee wins bid to appeal |
(11 minutes later) | |
A man has been told he can take his employer to tribunal on the grounds he was unfairly dismissed because of his views on climate change. | A man has been told he can take his employer to tribunal on the grounds he was unfairly dismissed because of his views on climate change. |
Tim Nicholson, of Oxford, was made redundant in July 2008 from Grainger Plc, Didcot, as head of sustainability. | |
In March a judge ruled the 41-year-old could use employment equality laws to claim unfair dismissal. | In March a judge ruled the 41-year-old could use employment equality laws to claim unfair dismissal. |
But the firm appealed against this as it believed his views were political and a "lifestyle choice". | |
'Philosophical belief' | |
Before the judgement, Mr Nicholson said: "My belief in climate change and the urgent need to do something about it is based on science. | Before the judgement, Mr Nicholson said: "My belief in climate change and the urgent need to do something about it is based on science. |
"One of the arguments made in the recent appeal hearing is that it would be illogical if there was protection afforded to a religious belief, say creationism, that perhaps isn't based on science, but Darwinism that very clearly is based on science is not afforded that same protection." | "One of the arguments made in the recent appeal hearing is that it would be illogical if there was protection afforded to a religious belief, say creationism, that perhaps isn't based on science, but Darwinism that very clearly is based on science is not afforded that same protection." |
Mr Nicholson was given permission in March to make his claim under the Employment Equality (Religion and Belief) Regulations 2003 that covers "any religion, religious belief, or philosophical belief". | |
But the ruling was challenged by Grainger on the grounds that green views are not the same as religious or philosophical beliefs. | |
Mr Nicholson claims that his opinions affect his whole lifestyle. He does not travel by plane and has renovated his home to be more eco-friendly. | |
The firm maintains that environmental views are political and a "lifestyle choice" which cannot be compared to religion or philosophy. |