This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/england/oxfordshire/8339652.stm

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Eco-employee wins bid to appeal Eco-employee wins bid to appeal
(11 minutes later)
A man has been told he can take his employer to tribunal on the grounds he was unfairly dismissed because of his views on climate change.A man has been told he can take his employer to tribunal on the grounds he was unfairly dismissed because of his views on climate change.
Tim Nicholson, of Oxford, was made redundant in July 2008 from Grainger Plc, Didcot, as head of sustainability at Grainger Plc in Didcot. Tim Nicholson, of Oxford, was made redundant in July 2008 from Grainger Plc, Didcot, as head of sustainability.
In March a judge ruled the 41-year-old could use employment equality laws to claim unfair dismissal.In March a judge ruled the 41-year-old could use employment equality laws to claim unfair dismissal.
But the firm appealed against this as it believed his views were political. But the firm appealed against this as it believed his views were political and a "lifestyle choice".
Mr Nicholson was given permission to make his claim under the Employment Equality (Religion and Belief) Regulations 2003 that covers "any religion, religious belief, or philosophical belief". 'Philosophical belief'
Before the judgement, Mr Nicholson said: "My belief in climate change and the urgent need to do something about it is based on science.Before the judgement, Mr Nicholson said: "My belief in climate change and the urgent need to do something about it is based on science.
"One of the arguments made in the recent appeal hearing is that it would be illogical if there was protection afforded to a religious belief, say creationism, that perhaps isn't based on science, but Darwinism that very clearly is based on science is not afforded that same protection.""One of the arguments made in the recent appeal hearing is that it would be illogical if there was protection afforded to a religious belief, say creationism, that perhaps isn't based on science, but Darwinism that very clearly is based on science is not afforded that same protection."
Mr Nicholson was given permission in March to make his claim under the Employment Equality (Religion and Belief) Regulations 2003 that covers "any religion, religious belief, or philosophical belief".
But the ruling was challenged by Grainger on the grounds that green views are not the same as religious or philosophical beliefs.
Mr Nicholson claims that his opinions affect his whole lifestyle. He does not travel by plane and has renovated his home to be more eco-friendly.
The firm maintains that environmental views are political and a "lifestyle choice" which cannot be compared to religion or philosophy.