This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/crr5j1q8wlno

The article has changed 10 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 4 Version 5
Muted mics and politeness - six takeaways from VP debate Muted mics and politeness - six takeaways from VP debate
(31 minutes later)
Watch key moments from the US vice-presidential debateWatch key moments from the US vice-presidential debate
During the first and only vice-presidential debate, JD Vance and Tim Walz launched attacks on their presidential opponents and sparred over international conflict, the US economy, immigration and abortion rights. On Tuesday night, JD Vance and Tim Walz launched attacks on their presidential opponents and sparred over international conflict, the US economy, immigration and abortion rights.
It was still perhaps the most civil debate of the campaign season - with a largely cordial tone and even moments of agreement - but it also featured several heated moments and at least one muted microphone. Despite those heated moments - and at least one muted microphone - this was perhaps the most civil debate of the 2024 election campaign. There were even points of agreement between the two men.
Here are some of the most memorable moments of the debate between former President Donald Trump and Vice-President Kamala Harris's running mates. Here are some of the most memorable parts of the first and only scheduled TV showdown between running mates of Kamala Harris and Donald Trump.
1) Immigration clash leads to muted mics 1) Mics muted after a tussle over immigration
Watch: Mics muted after host fact-checks Vance on Springfield migrantsWatch: Mics muted after host fact-checks Vance on Springfield migrants
Immigration was a key topic throughout the 90-minute debate. Vance, a Republican senator from Ohio, frequently returned to the issue of the US southern border and immigration, viewed by voters as a weakness for Democrats. Immigration was a key topic throughout the 90-minute head-to-head. Vance, a Republican senator from Ohio, frequently returned to the issue of the US southern border and immigration - viewed by many voters as a weakness for his opponents.
Walz, the Democratic governor of Minnesota, countered that Trump helped torpedo bipartisan legislation backed by the Biden administration that would have enacted some of the most toughest immigration policy in US history. Walz, the Democratic governor of Minnesota, countered that Trump helped torpedo bipartisan legislation that would have enacted some of the most toughest immigration policy in US history.
The discussion ultimately turned tense when Vance was asked about false claims he made about Haitian migrants in Springfield, Ohio. Vance and Trump previously shared conspiracy theories that migrants came to the US illegally and then ate household pets in the small city. The discussion ultimately turned tense when Vance was asked about false claims he made about Haitian migrants in Springfield, Ohio. Vance and Trump previously shared conspiracy theories that illegal migrants were eating pets in the small city.
When a CBS moderator tried to correct Vance over the claims, noting that the migrants in Springfield are there legally, the Ohio senator spoke over the hosts, who then muted his microphone. When a CBS News moderator tried to correct Vance, the Ohio senator spoke over the hosts - who went on to mute his microphone.
WHO WON? Anthony Zurcher analyses the showdownWHO WON? Anthony Zurcher analyses the showdown
VOTER PANEL: Midwest voters praise tone of VP debateVOTER PANEL: Midwest voters praise tone of VP debate
BBC VERIFY: Immigration, Project 2025, taxes - the debate fact-checkedBBC VERIFY: Immigration, Project 2025, taxes - the debate fact-checked
POLL-TRACKER: Who's leading the US presidential race?POLL-TRACKER: Who's leading the US presidential race?
2) International conflict looms over contest 2) Middle East tensions loom large
The first question put to the candidates was on many Americans' minds Tuesday: the conflict in the Middle East. Walz and Vance took the stage just hours after Iran launched a missile attack on Israel - whose prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, vowed retaliation.
Both Walz and Vance took the stage just hours after Iran launched a missile attack on Israel, whose prime minister - Benjamin Netanyahu - pledged that Iran would pay for the strike. The ongoing tensions in the Middle East formed the basis of the first question.
Appearing nervous, Walz stumbled during his first response as he repeated Harris's promise of iron-clad support of Israel. Appearing nervous, Walz stumbled as he repeated Harris's promise of iron-clad support for Israel.
Vance, meanwhile, reiterated one of Trump's main talking points: that no new world conflicts broke out during the former president's time in office.Vance, meanwhile, reiterated one of Trump's main talking points: that no new world conflicts broke out during the former president's time in office.
Neither man, however, would say if they approve of a preemptive strike by Israel on Iran. Neither man would say if they approved of a pre-emptive strike by Israel on Iran.
3) Walz digs in on abortion and Vance shifts position 3) Vance vow to win back voters' 'trust' on abortion
Vance: We need to earn Americans' trust back on abortionVance: We need to earn Americans' trust back on abortion
Abortion rights, a top issue in the 2024 election, sparked one of the longest and most heated debates of the night. Abortion rights, a top issue in the 2024 election, sparked one of the longest and most heated exchanges of the night.
It's an issue Democrats have used to galvanize voters, regularly framing Trump as a threat to women's autonomy because of his role in appointing a conservative majority to the Supreme Court. The court later overturned Roe v Wade, the ruling that had protected abortion rights in the US for decades.It's an issue Democrats have used to galvanize voters, regularly framing Trump as a threat to women's autonomy because of his role in appointing a conservative majority to the Supreme Court. The court later overturned Roe v Wade, the ruling that had protected abortion rights in the US for decades.
Walz took a similar approach Tuesday, citing the stories of Amber Thurman and Candi Miller, two Georgia women whose deaths were connected to abortion restrictions in their home state. Walz cited the stories of Amber Thurman and Candi Miller, two women from Georgia whose deaths were connected to abortion restrictions in their home state.
Until a state judge struck down the Georgia law, abortion was banned in the state after six weeks.
Vance, meanwhile, said his opinion on the issue had changed. He previously supported some type of national restrictions on abortion, but said his position shifted when he saw the majority of Ohio voters supported access to abortion.Vance, meanwhile, said his opinion on the issue had changed. He previously supported some type of national restrictions on abortion, but said his position shifted when he saw the majority of Ohio voters supported access to abortion.
4) 'I'm a knucklehead at times' He also said his party had to do "so much better... at earning the American people's trust back on this issue, where they frankly just don't trust us".
4) 'I'm a knucklehead at times,' Walz admits
Walz on Tiananmen claim: I'm a knucklehead at timesWalz on Tiananmen claim: I'm a knucklehead at times
Just before the debate, Walz's previous claim that he was in Hong Kong when the Tiananmen Square massacre occurred in June 1989 collapsed under fresh scrutiny. Just before the debate, a claim of Walz's collapsed under scrutiny - that he had been in Hong Kong when the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre occurred in Beijing.
"I'm a knucklehead at times," Walz said when asked about it during the debate. "I'm a knucklehead at times," Walz said when asked about it on Tuesday night.
The Minnesota governor clarified that he had misspoken, saying he was influenced by the events because he had arrived in China that summer.The Minnesota governor clarified that he had misspoken, saying he was influenced by the events because he had arrived in China that summer.
Vance also was asked to answer for some past comments, including prior attacks on his running mate, Trump, who he once called "America's Hitler".Vance also was asked to answer for some past comments, including prior attacks on his running mate, Trump, who he once called "America's Hitler".
The Ohio senator said in response that he, like many people, has made mistakes in the past. The Ohio senator said he, like many people, has made mistakes in the past. "I was wrong about Donald Trump," he said.
"I was wrong about Donald Trump," Vance told the moderators. 5) Vance defends Trump over Capitol riot
5) Politeness takes centre stage In a tense moment, Vance was asked about Trump's false claims that the 2020 election was "rigged".
The vice-presidential debate stood in stark contrast to Kamala Harris and Donald Trump’s first encounter last month, when insults flew and interruptions were frequent. The moderators also raised Vance's previous comments that he would not have certified the 2020 election results if he had been vice-president at the time.
Starting off the night with a handshake, both Vance and Walz proceeded to address each other politely and with great civility. The two even exchanged smiles periodically, at times agreeing with what the other had said. Vance maintained his support for Trump, saying the former president had asked demonstrators on 6 January 2021 - the day of the Capitol riot - to protest peacefully.
There were only a few heated moments throughout the debate. The discussion grew somewhat tense when moderators asked about abortion and immigration, but the two men largely stayed away from personal attacks.
They did direct some fire at the top of the ticket, however.
6) Vance defends Trump over Capitol riot
In another tense moment, Vance was asked about Trump's false claims that the 2020 election was "rigged".
The moderators also raised Vance's previous comments that he would not have certified the 2020 election results as vice-president.
The Ohio senator maintained his support for Trump, saying the former president had asked demonstrators on 6 January - the day of the Capitol riot - to protest peacefully.
He added that Walz will "have my prayers, he'll have my best wishes and he'll have my help" if the Democrats win the election, but maintained that there were legitimate questions to raise about voting fraud and security.He added that Walz will "have my prayers, he'll have my best wishes and he'll have my help" if the Democrats win the election, but maintained that there were legitimate questions to raise about voting fraud and security.
His answer was met with some scepticism from Walz, who said he and his opponent were "miles apart" on the issue of 6 January and election integrity.His answer was met with some scepticism from Walz, who said he and his opponent were "miles apart" on the issue of 6 January and election integrity.
6) Politeness takes centre-stage
The tone was in stark contrast to Kamala Harris and Donald Trump’s first encounter last month, when insults flew and interruptions were frequent.
Starting off the night with a handshake, both Vance and Walz proceeded to address each other politely and with civility. The two even exchanged smiles periodically, agreeing from time to time with what their rival had said.
They did direct some fire at the top of the ticket, however - Vance taking aim at Harris and Walz at Trump.
More on US electionMore on US election
SIMPLE GUIDE: Everything you need to know about the voteSIMPLE GUIDE: Everything you need to know about the vote
EXPLAINER: Seven swing states that could decide electionEXPLAINER: Seven swing states that could decide election
FACT CHECK: Was US economy stronger under Biden or Trump?FACT CHECK: Was US economy stronger under Biden or Trump?
POLICIES: What Harris or Trump would do in powerPOLICIES: What Harris or Trump would do in power
POLLS: Who is winning the race for the White House?POLLS: Who is winning the race for the White House?
North America correspondent Anthony Zurcher makes sense of the race for the White House in his twice weekly US Election Unspun newsletter. Readers in the UK can sign up here. Those outside the UK can sign up here.North America correspondent Anthony Zurcher makes sense of the race for the White House in his twice weekly US Election Unspun newsletter. Readers in the UK can sign up here. Those outside the UK can sign up here.