This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/education/8345453.stm

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
'Fine exam boards' that dumb down 'Fine exam boards' that dumb down
(about 6 hours later)
Exam boards that breach the expected standards in science and "dumb down" the subject should face hefty fines or even bans, a leading scientist says.Exam boards that breach the expected standards in science and "dumb down" the subject should face hefty fines or even bans, a leading scientist says.
Chief executive of the Royal Society of Chemistry Dr Richard Pike claims entire exam papers contain no maths in them, and some questions no science. Chief executive of the Royal Society of Chemistry, Dr Richard Pike, claims entire exam papers contain no maths in them and some questions no science.
Dr Pike said a new, more independent regulator with more clout was needed to prevent standards from "dumbing down".Dr Pike said a new, more independent regulator with more clout was needed to prevent standards from "dumbing down".
Exam standards watchdog Ofqual said it was taking steps to improve science.Exam standards watchdog Ofqual said it was taking steps to improve science.
Dr Pike said: "The science community has identified entire science papers with no underlying maths, and science questions with no science.Dr Pike said: "The science community has identified entire science papers with no underlying maths, and science questions with no science.
"This is a blatant breach of expected standards.""This is a blatant breach of expected standards."
A million pound surcharge would focus the mind of any examining board chief executive Dr Richard PikeRoyal SocietyA million pound surcharge would focus the mind of any examining board chief executive Dr Richard PikeRoyal Society
He described one Key Stage 3 Sats paper from 2008 which asked a question that was more a test of literacy than science.He described one Key Stage 3 Sats paper from 2008 which asked a question that was more a test of literacy than science.
It asked where the energy for "a solar-powered mole scarer" comes from.It asked where the energy for "a solar-powered mole scarer" comes from.
Dr Pike said: "For all the science needed, this could have been instead a toothbrush or a nail clipper!"Dr Pike said: "For all the science needed, this could have been instead a toothbrush or a nail clipper!"
He accused exam boards of running a "race to the bottom" as they attempted to make their wares more attractive to schools and pupils.He accused exam boards of running a "race to the bottom" as they attempted to make their wares more attractive to schools and pupils.
He added that even attempts to make topics more relevant had been largely abandoned as boards focused on "simplicity and multiple choice questions".He added that even attempts to make topics more relevant had been largely abandoned as boards focused on "simplicity and multiple choice questions".
He said: "In any other endeavour, this would be unacceptable. Break the rules in Formula 1, and you get banned. Contravene competition law, and you get fined.He said: "In any other endeavour, this would be unacceptable. Break the rules in Formula 1, and you get banned. Contravene competition law, and you get fined.
"A million pound surcharge would focus the mind of any examining board chief executive and overnight would do more than years of 'discussion between stakeholders'.""A million pound surcharge would focus the mind of any examining board chief executive and overnight would do more than years of 'discussion between stakeholders'."
'Immediate action''Immediate action'
Ofqual said it had made clear earlier this year that work needed to be done to improve GCSE science.Ofqual said it had made clear earlier this year that work needed to be done to improve GCSE science.
A spokesman said: "Specific problems identified included the lack of challenge and demand in some question papers, the quality of work at grades A and C in some exams, and the high weighting given to objective tests in some specifications.A spokesman said: "Specific problems identified included the lack of challenge and demand in some question papers, the quality of work at grades A and C in some exams, and the high weighting given to objective tests in some specifications.
"As a result the GCSE science criteria has been the subject of a consultation over the summer and will be fully revised. The awarding bodies will then develop new specifications, taking into account Ofqual's report."As a result the GCSE science criteria has been the subject of a consultation over the summer and will be fully revised. The awarding bodies will then develop new specifications, taking into account Ofqual's report.
"In the meantime Ofqual required immediate action from the awarding bodies to improve the situation in the short term.""In the meantime Ofqual required immediate action from the awarding bodies to improve the situation in the short term."